/p/ - Photography

Resources & discussion regarding the heliographic practice

SAVE THIS FILE: Anon.cafe Fallback File v1.0 (updated 2021-01-10)

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 5120

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

Board Rules
More

(used to delete files and postings)


Enter the Darkroom


Welcome to /p/ Photog 05/02/2020 (Sat) 06:10:18 No.4 [Reply]
Hello there buddies and welcome to /p/, the board dedicated to all things related to the visual time machine. I want to mention i'm going to try my best to be as off-hands as i can be regarding discussion to exert the max comfiness possible, but we are still bound to follow our hosts' rules plus some comments of mine: 1. Follow the global rules, which are based on the Romani 2012 Criminal Code. They can be found at our Home page but in short they state that we should: a) Avoid posting or requesting information that might harm something or someone, these include social security and/or financial card numbers, registration plates, an asshole's physical direction, comprehensive government structures' layouts, etc. b) Avoid posting sexually suggestive images of individuals from the genus Homo that were under 18 years old, or might appear under said age without ID confirmation, when the images were taken. b.i) In this segment images of "juveniles simulating sexual behavior in a credible manner" are also included, meaning realistic 3D renders are prohibited. Such are the drac laws. - Because of what constitutes "suggestive" is a subjective matter, the "Bas" Dost test can be performed by a judge (in this case the BO or A.C's administration). - It contains 6 questions or factors that constitute if the poster is guilty or not, the number of positives to give such judgement is where the controversy begins but to keep it simply i'm going to state that: If it is suspicious that's a spoiler, if it turns me or a G-Vol on that's a delete, if it is highly arousing to any man then that's a ban - The difference between Grigori Galitsin and Garry Gross is the legal team, you might back that up under U.S. law but this site is based on gypsy land, so we reiterate an urgent appeal to avoid these images. 2. Spoiler gore or NSFW content because Canadians and Australians might bug and harass our host's administration if otherwise. We are currently classified as NSFW but the eternal leaf still doesn't care. 3. Do not spam gore/porn/nude oeuvre made to incit a normal sexual reaction due to the aforementioned reason. - I will consider "spam" the action of posting more than 5 times something tertiary to the topic at hand or from the reply chain. - If the topic IS nudes or something very related (the oeuvre of a specific photographer specialized in that, for example) then this rule does not apply, but Rule 2 still does. 4. Do not post invite links to Discord groups. Just Don't. 5. Meta content should be posted here >>2 to make things faster and cleaner for all of us.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Edited last time by Lensman on 10/28/2020 (Wed) 07:36:31.

Designated Gear Thread Photog 05/22/2021 (Sat) 00:23:06 No.193 [Reply]
Dreaded but necessary, this is the spot for discussion towards the hardware and perhaps some of the software. Lenses, cameras, tripods, belts, grub, you name it.
22 posts and 46 images omitted.
Open file (312.04 KB 1000x1500 _D7H2501.jpg)
Open file (336.44 KB 1000x1500 _D7H2503.jpg)
Open file (541.15 KB 720x960 P1010017-(2).jpg)
Open file (482.52 KB 1080x720 _D7H2855.jpg)
>>248 Hey there >400mm in physical length I didn't think about that lol, it makes sense somewhat that the lens is very rudimentary in design that it went for 40cm and then they designed glass elements in between that would make it reach a respectable f-grade/sharpness. I don't know anything about lens designs but i recall the very, very old lenses somewhat functioned with calculations like that. >It has that desaturated low contrast retro look Might as well post it now, here's a shot i took (ruthlessly edited) with the converter and the 85-205mm and the effect is doubled, cliche as it is it has that look. I wanted to do a separate post about the converter and that zoom as they were released around the same year/season so it makes sense, but i stalled it, focused more on the 200mm Nikkor and i waited for 2 other lenses to test them altogether... then one never came but two somehow did (in different versions i don't want) and i waited for the original missing one to test them ALL at once but got hit with some expenses and now i have no monies so i am waiting for a job to finally buy it. Fuck FedEx. >Are you sure it's just that? I mean the P1000 also suffers the same problems when compared near my area/climate, it's dry heat at 40+ celsius that bounces on pavement, i also felt it didn't quite reach infinity but it made sense that most things are wavy, some other pictures i took from that hill are way clearer in colder days, and things nearer than that cable have also been seen with the waves. It's just hot stuff i think. >Would you try some moon shots? Will try soon now that you mention it although i am pretty bad at it, my tripod doesn't handle the D700 without a lens so i will use a window corner along with the chinesium long legs to support the canon. >Also will you be taking any pics with no converter? That was a trip, i did take some later but i forgot which ones they were, it was mostly random clouds because around those days we had a massive spike of Jewvid-19 and couldn't go out with that missile in my hands. I can say they were much clearer, the performance is similar to the Vivitar 200mm f3,5 which makes sense. Def worth 30 bucks (shipping not included lel). Second pic (slightly edited) and third pic (unedited) here i think were from that ""shoot"", fourth pic (Stylus) is just clowning around and taking another pic of the machine. And the DoF still "pops", i was never bothered to think about those fast 400mm f2.8/600mm f4 until i grabbed this thing, makes me wonder how would one of those beasts perform in urban environmental shoots that would exploit the relatively shorter distances between buildings/subjects rather than nature pics or some sportbilder of africans attempting to dribble euro defenders. Aaand i found a pic of that, i stalked this hungry/bored worker with the converter and decided to snap him last without it, there's a massive difference taking into account i can reach the same levels without using any sliders as this is unedited too.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>249 >I didn't think about that lol, it makes sense somewhat that the lens is very rudimentary in design that it went for 40cm and then they designed glass elements in between that would make it reach a respectable f-grade/sharpness. >I don't know anything about lens designs but i recall the very, very old lenses somewhat functioned with calculations like that. You know what's funny, I was just eyeballing it based on seeing it next to the 85-205mm and it turns out the lens itself is over 43cm long. It's probably not even a telephoto in the optical sense of the word (a lens physically shorter than its focal length) although I'm not sure if it's overall size or distance between first and last element. The "correct" word would be "long focus lens" but at this point telephoto has become a practical synonym even if it's somewhat of an abuse of nomenclature. >Might as well post it now, here's a shot i took (ruthlessly edited) with the converter and the 85-205mm and the effect is doubled, cliche as it is it has that look. I perceive a softness but not the desaturated look, may be because of the editing though. >I mean the P1000 also suffers the same problems when compared near my area/climate, it's dry heat at 40+ celsius that bounces on pavement, i also felt it didn't quite reach infinity but it made sense that most things are wavy, some other pictures i took from that hill are way clearer in colder days, and things nearer than that cable have also been seen with the waves. It's just hot stuff i think. Could you point to the waves specifically? I'm not doubting what you say, but my perception of it was that it looked almost like a gaussian blur aka out of focus. Not having witnessed the scene itself makes it more difficult to spot. >And the DoF still "pops", i was never bothered to think about those fast 400mm f2.8/600mm f4 until i grabbed this thing, makes me wonder how would one of those beasts perform in urban environmental shoots that would exploit the relatively shorter distances between buildings/subjects rather than nature pics or some sportbilder of africans attempting to dribble euro defenders. I think they'd be both technically impressive and aesthetically disappointing (for our tastes). The glare and field curvature tend to be very well controlled in those modern lenses. Probably not a lot different from the typical football (not talking handegg) closeup from the gigantic 4K video lenses used in sports broadcasting nowadays. >Aaand i found a pic of that, i stalked this hungry/bored worker with the converter and decided to snap him last without it, there's a massive difference taking into account i can reach the same levels without using any sliders as this is unedited too. That's impressive.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Open file (218.54 KB 1500x1000 _D7H2855beeg.jpg)
Open file (134.67 KB 1500x1000 _D7H2849beeg.jpg)
Open file (868.47 KB 1280x960 1629423597989-4.jpg)
>>250 >The "correct" word would be "long focus lens" but at this point telephoto has become a practical synonym even if it's somewhat of an abuse of nomenclature. It's still very good to know this, never knew specifically when to call something telephoto in the traditional sense when photogs still used bellows and rulers to catch focus. >may be because of the editing though. The converter is a cool tool to use in close distances as it doesn't change the MFD but it's an optical rapist, the editing is pushed a lot in terms of my old sensor tech. An apt comparison is with that last image of the roof worker, that one is without (here again first pic in bigger size for better comparison) and second pic is the near previous shot ("in focus") with it. As many old timey converters do this one just zooms into the optic but does not correct much other than the bare minimum for optimal focusing, it might be useless for big megapickel cameras but for my 12mp it is handy to avoid cropping much. Flaws get more notorious, contrast falls due to cheap glass i suppose, and so on with the consequences of shooting wide open to keep things at f16 rather than f22. The coated Nikkor 200mm is more lax because i can bump that one to f5.6 for better performance, not that it needs much because at f4 it is very good. I would add that the softness is a combination of the lenses not being that sharp to begin with at base f and my relatively "conservative" approach to sharpness at least compared to the "people" i've seen in the other old place i am hesitant to visit when i do. I am not one of those "sharpness is overrated" lads but i do tend not to push it that much because most places i've used, like print places or IG/500px, often downsample and then sharpen again for good measure which fucks things up at many times, coupled that i like "airy" atmospheres i find myself rarely editing to critical detail although i did that not long ago. I do not repent for my crimes against art using Structure and Clarity sliders a bit much but i reserve that for wacky moments, i am studying to understand why that's bad but i keep seeing my past attempts and i keep liking them lol. >Could you point to the waves specifically? Sure, right now we are in the colder side of the year but at noon i might find an example to show that, still i will search again my backlog if i caught several examples from the same situation before to make the comparison. >in those modern lenses That is true although one might caught a surprise with the 80's and 90's ones like the Nikkor D or AI-S ones, but they have magic dust ED glass so they might be corrected a lot anyways. >used in sports broadcasting nowadays. lol my region still has some sort of early 2000's chinaman tech that makes things looks like a cyberpunk parody when chromatic aberration and flares appear, nobody wants to pay up to replace them as they cost the same as a starting player so we are in limbo; absurd zoom range tho. Can't whine anyways because in my place a ticket to see a game fairly close costs 3 dollars, 5 or 7 if a cool team comes in a cup game. >I heard it really takes things up a notch.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>250 >I've lately been carrying an old digishit Ah yes the digishit alliance, to be fair my entry point to those bastards back there. What are you carrying? Been wanting to pounce one from two or three 20-30 dollar prospects (apart from a much newer 200 dollar one) in the mid-future now that i've seen people starting to condition the scene to start shilling for them due to 90's nostalgia in artsy circles, that one dude in the /dst/ thread isn't wrong at all: Digi P&S's might very well become the next hipster fad like the cheapo film ones that were once joked about.
>>251 Hell why i didn't think of it, here's an unedited version of The Delivery Man you saw earlier here >>233, a glimpse on what the usual images look like before taking a Photoshop therapy. Also in second pic an example of what our broadcasting cameras look like, in ours at night you can see the width a big wider even and without cropping like this one.

Open file (4.81 MB 4000x3000 P1230777.JPG)
Open file (4.92 MB 4000x3000 P1230217.JPG)
Open file (4.99 MB 4000x3000 P1230299.JPG)
Open file (4.87 MB 4000x3000 P1230300.JPG)
Open file (4.86 MB 4000x3000 P1230305.JPG)
Your Pictures Thread Photog 05/02/2020 (Sat) 06:02:51 No.3 [Reply]
Post pictures that you've taken to share them with other anons. Talk about the things you like to take pics of and what camera you use. I'll start. I use a Lumix FZ48, and I like to take pictures of nature, and I want to get into more Urbex pictures.
35 posts and 72 images omitted.
Open file (570.98 KB 1000x1000 CropP128AdapDff.png)
Just screwing around with medium high contrast on some pics from the Stylus 300. Those deep skies get so blocky when shooting anything but full blue i need to add harsh grain to hide it.
>>242 Oh nice, you're alive BO lol. I'm Vivitar anon, I fucked up a modernization of a Sigma lens (ruined the flex when doing the rechip) and have been trying to figure out how to repair it without much success (but to be fair didn't do too many tries either). I need to find some motivation to get myself shooting again because last stuff I shot was a family reunion lol. Really boring life lately in terms of photo opportunities.
>>243 How you doin' man, glad to see you are still around as i didn't identify your ways anywhere until recently >I fucked up a modernization of a Sigma lens >the flex when doing the rechip The flex? a zoom with in-lens AF motor? that's major words, rechip i guess to communicate with another mount? that's some balls and with a Sigma lens i also suppose it's an old because the newer ones are pretty pricey, Guess you got stuck with the world famous Sigma body construction quality lol, hope at least you can use that thing, i recently read about modding some old Nikkor lenses but the thought of having to move the little spring that moves the aperture makes me sick, i think i would rather experiment with the helicoid than to deal with that little devil again. >I need to find some motivation to get myself shooting again >Really boring life lately in terms of photo opportunities Same here man but things might change soon, we got told this week we had to get back to college and all the previous and recently made plans to continue virtually were scrapped, also it seems da vaxx is mandatory so i am against the wall, i might infiltrate for a bit and for little time just to give face to some professors because i don't intend to go without buying Iver in bulk, they will check for papers soon so my days are counted and i will shoot like crazy all locations i haven't experimented in. Shit sucks because apart from my area being invaded overnight with commie groups i also haven't bought a wide angle lens so many ideas i had are vaporized. Not a lot of money either so no rentals for more than a couple of days, will have to do with my telephotos or the 28mm in my superzoom. Bought some stuff since the last time i saw you and made a small project, all telephoto or point and shoots tho as you can see in these threads. Money has been scarce so i will probably get a job after they suspend me but everything for the glory of photography man. By the way did you recently ask for someone with a pyramid preset? didn't realize we were so many shamefur crossposters back there, and that's for a small board, i lurked rarely but i saw the Stylus anon post on IG some old stuff so i checked the place and he was there predictably on the spot, so i asked some questions and threw some photos you can see here funny that the quickest way to pacify/kill a thread there is to post more than 5 photos, i've done so with other material but not my own time ago and it just works Photo just to upload something because the board is in the chopping board of the admins supposedly my 7th photo ever after getting my hands on what was the family's new camera.
>>244 Finally managed to repair the flex, basically DIY'd a new one. >The flex? a zoom with in-lens AF motor? AF yes, but it's a prime. It uses a flex for miniaturization. >rechip i guess to communicate with another mount? It's just an add-on chip that piggybacks and translates the old EF protocol to the new one. Canon pulled a bait and switch with third party lenses some years ago so in stock form Sigma lenses from many years ago only fully work on film bodies (they don't stop down or even let the camera take pictures at any aperture other than wide open). Sigma did a conversion at some point but they have long stopped since, as it's 90s glass at best. >that's some balls and with a Sigma lens i also suppose it's an old because the newer ones are pretty pricey, It is a Sigma indeed. I had more balls than brains so I didn't get the flux to do the desoldering, leading to disastrous results. But I've managed to fix it since, luckily. >Guess you got stuck with the world famous Sigma body construction quality lol, hope at least you can use that thing lol, indeed. It's a hefty fucker for being a tiny 28mm, metal barrel. >i recently read about modding some old Nikkor lenses but the thought of having to move the little spring that moves the aperture makes me sick, i think i would rather experiment with the helicoid than to deal with that little devil again. Declicking or something? >Shit sucks because apart from my area being invaded overnight with commie groups i also haven't bought a wide angle lens so many ideas i had are vaporized. Can I recommend two cheap decent wides? Sigma Super Wide II 24mm f/2.8 (mine, but the Nikon version takes no modification to work) and Vivitar 24mm f/2. >iver I'm not sure it works, to be fair. I got vaxx'd myself, mostly as a way to avoid getting Pfizer in the future and to get people to stop busting my balls with the vax insistence. Got an inactivated virus one. They were pushing for a booster shot with Pfizer but as you can imagine I'm not falling for that. >pyramid

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>244 Also this is the same lens I have but for Nikon: 294470782490

Photography Digital Resources Photog 05/20/2020 (Wed) 11:48:55 No.36 [Reply] [Last]
For the betterment of our users we shall proclaim a small library of resources like PDFs and videos. This is the place to share personal ways, known names, discovered channels, own documents and particular files that can enhance our abilities in this hobby. But due to concerns regarding the hosting size made clear to me by our admin we should upload them externally via media share sites or, in the case of videos, refer to a site or quick way to get them. Pretty simple activity but i do recommend using trusted filehosts, obscuring names, using passwords and other assorted privacy measures to avoid bots or crawlers from taking content down. I mean we are not sharing anything illegal and we sure are not pirating anything either but it's best to be reserved :^) From my part i just finished organizing and uploading a bunch of stuff you guys might find helpful. I will make a post for each theme and probably recommend one or two documents from that batch, i haven't read much other than the stuff i bought but i will try to make the best bet from what i've gathered in the many previews i did, otherwise you can check the list and see what you fancy as there's probably the high chance i might've missed a golden standard or just very good document. I still have many files left in reserve and will post the topic names if anyone is curious or needs some, honestly those didn't get up because i got tired and rushed to gather essentials.
Edited last time by Lensman on 05/22/2020 (Fri) 03:01:27.
47 posts and 71 images omitted.
>>214 >I don't recall well but i said something that a 16yo and a 18yo have less biological differences than a 21yo and a 53yo, not referencing them doing the bad thing but clearly the context was related to it. The thing is, I can't help you if you don't try to post and tell me what the site gives you back, lol. >Did i mention that? apologies if i did make it sound like that, it wasn't there but at dunk's. I see. No offense taken by the way, I just happen to like /art/ but I don't run it. I only moderate global stuff from there. I do moderate /dunk/ though, lol. >I don't think people would be so angry if the rule of "random boards mean mods can do random things too" was written explicitly. Again it's rare for a ban to happen on /dunk/ unless someone is being a complete ass and trying to make the entire board intentionally unpleasant in general.
Open file (81.97 KB 826x414 posttest.jpg)
>>216 >tell me what the site gives you back Sorry, i got carried out, i recall it probably gave me the IP thing hence why i immediately thought it was a range one because i am in high doubt anyone is near me, you mentioned spammers use any kind of IP ranges but the odds seem slim for me. The specific message/screencap is: And it isn't there anymore, now i have gone and done it. Did you clean ranges? at least i can give you a date/context, it was a thread very similar or perhaps is 47476 (i am seeing familiar posts but i don't quite recall if it was there, lots of posts missing), i was with other two anons who went a bit more overboard than me. It was either that or a previous "8moe drama saga" thread. Because it's dunk i don't mind entering those games but someone slapped me or the spammers. >I do moderate /dunk/ though, lol. So it is you, then you probably remember that thread, you slammed some of us there. >it's rare for a ban to happen on /dunk/ Come on now, i am not going to say they don't ask for it but come on now, unless everyone at other places are making stuff.
>>215 Neat, bookmarked.
>>217 >The specific message/screencap is: And it isn't there anymore, now i have gone and done it. Did you clean ranges? It may have been an overly wide range we banned a few days ago that blocked even some of the mods, probably unrelated to whatever you posted on /dunk/. >So it is you, then you probably remember that thread, you slammed some of us there. I'm one of the many who do moderate /dunk/. It may be a VPN with a node near you. >Come on now, i am not going to say they don't ask for it but come on now, unless everyone at other places are making stuff. I mean for the majority of users. You have to be trying really hard to get banned, lol. We don't enjoy banning. It's something we do when someone forces our hand. Also if you have a dynamic IP (it seems that way from the way your IP is constantly changing) there's a chance it had recently been abused and registered in an anti-spam spam list. In any case I'm glad to have you back.
>>214 >You mean stuff that should not be touched? i can somewhat understand that but Sneed is not something i would think to be a priority. That actually sounds hilarious the more i think of it but i am suspecting i didn't quite get what you were saying. It wasn't Sneed on its own. It was "street snapshots" and speaking in a positive way about landscape, lol. Thread is still up, 3882709. They got super defensive about it. >The derangement hypothesis is not an idea of ours after all, it really is an actual thing. They didn't like my comment about brits either heh. The place has been overtaken by lefty faggots, who happen to have some of the sacred cows mentioned above. I think I'm going to tell them something they like is burgueois at some point in the future to see how they react. They're a fun lolcow to prod. >Fully, i didn't back there yet i had 3 around here (one got canned at Julay). Mark didn't restore anything unless he had something to win, it's a miracle how /p/ there got restored but nobody other than Exakta returned, oh and me to talk about this place but they deleted my post. Supposedly the guy in charge of doing the actual restorations was Codemonkey and Mark just handled the emails. Mark claims he protested when Codemonkey started deleting backups back when they decided "phase 1" was over. The entire ordeal left a very sour taste in my mouth because of the lack of transparency. They didn't even give me a backup to deploy elsewhere when I requested it (admittedly too late, had I known I'd have backed up long before shit went down).

Open file (468.23 KB 1280x900 DSLR Cut A.jpg)
/p/ Meta Thread Photog 05/02/2020 (Sat) 05:01:50 No.2 [Reply]
A place for all things meta regarding our small dark room. Suggestions, banners, board exposure plans, they go here. Be not afraid to comment.
15 posts and 12 images omitted.
Open file (1.16 MB 1200x1200 Echoes Lmr4.jpg)
Open file (1.86 MB 1200x1250 P1230305 PS CROPPED.jpg)
Open file (2.23 MB 1200x1600 P1230300 PSD CROPPED.jpg)
Open file (1.70 MB 1200x1800 IMG_3204 PSD.jpg)
>>28 There we go, i screwed everything i had to do in my student life but at least i'm still alive and well. In a little spare time i had i clowned myself into some photos for our sampler, i had way too much fun with the 4th pic >>27 and tried to think of something with the 5th but still escapes me. Is it okay or do we pick others? Also added some stuff into the CSS and got some books organized and uploaded, so i guess it's time for a crucial thread.
>>28 >also can i modify them a little? i mean framing and color toning, nothing extreme. Of course you can modify them a bit! I'm happy to help in any way I can, sorry to get back to you so late, been busy for the past week, but things should be calmed down by now. >>33 I like the new theme a lot, thanks for contributing it! >>34 Nice pictures man, I really like the lighting.
Rabbit rabbit November 1st, hey there, been kinda busy with studies lately and it's been messing with my lurking and reading due to the bizarre timings due to pandemic reschedules and phantom workplace pressure, hence not so much posting from my part. Also developed a mild imageboard addiction after trying to post more than usual in all boards to keep things alive, and mixed with everything else, all my times and projects went haywire and haven't really posted anything of much value in the last couple months either here or on /film/-/loomis/. Some days ago i fell pretty ill and hallucinated for a bit, got a small existential crisis and decided to stop posting for a while until i get all my shit together, so there's that if you see this place more abandoned than usual. Will return from time to time to the account to see if there's any reports for bad content but other than that i'll see you again in 45-50 days.
Open file (5.21 KB 188x188 Muk.png)
Lots of drama going around but so far all quiet in this front. I will see how to fix this new CSS format and post cool stuff.
I just stopped in to say that I really like the CSS you guys use.

Open file (179.16 KB 700x1280 icup7trophypic.png)
Infinity Cup poll Photog 04/22/2021 (Thu) 19:09:29 No.185 [Reply]
Hey guys, /icup/ here with a question on how we're going to handle the next iteration of the Infinity Cup ( https://anon.cafe/icup/ ) We're trying to poll whether certain boards are interested in playing in the cup, or if there's some specific team that you'd like to see play. If you want to, please answer or add your own answer to the poll in https://poal.me/6x3j1u

Merry Christmas Photog 12/25/2020 (Fri) 19:49:08 No.175 [Reply]
Merry Christmas from /co/!
> <
'' ''

Open file (337.74 KB 1820x1214 Unknown Photographer.jpg)
Names at the Exhibition Photog 05/03/2020 (Sun) 05:18:16 No.14 [Reply] [Last]
Let's look into some of the famous, and not so famous, photographers' works to get some inspiration, ideas or entertainment by looking at some of their pictures in small dumps. Also serves as a way to force myself into enjoying this hobby without a camera. Anything goes as long as you like it enough to expose it, in my case i will post some of them once in a while in a constant format.
71 posts and 287 images omitted.
Open file (4.13 MB 600x580 Flower.webm)
Open file (4.50 MB 600x580 Kyūshū.webm)
His particular style regarding the visual games and tricks with the horizon lines are tasty, at least for me, along with the use he gave to the wide-angle lenses, providing them with a niche to shoot people too unlike what the critics said. His actual influence might be more obvious to me in further ventures into the nippon photography scene, or perhaps i might see some who shaped his eye, but so far he's a favorite due to his very clear cut topics and documentation, projects presented in pairs, blue palettes and obviously his stylistic freedom. Now that i think of it maybe i've seen work of his before but who knows, perhaps one day i'll find his fashion/studio shots and provide some further examples. Meanwhile i guess i will finish the other posts first.
i've archived this thread to get these pics. thanks for the wonderful dump Anon.
Open file (477.43 KB 1599x1103 Aleutians.jpg)
Open file (106.96 KB 800x600 ph_bp.jpg)
Open file (104.40 KB 800x600 bp.jpg)
Open file (114.52 KB 800x600 phbp.jpg)
Check out this guy's stuff. Pretty cool imo. http://www.coreyfishes.com
>>165 Noice, that Nord Norge part is pretty cool. Some meme images here and there but generally it's good.
There's some overused trends nowadays and the last two ones here follow them but in its specific context i think they work very well, this guy's very good. I'll check him further, thanks anon.

Open file (271.36 KB 1280x688 bowling alley.jpg)
Film stock Photog 05/01/2020 (Fri) 15:48:16 No.1 [Reply]
What's your guys' favorite film stock?
I'm kind of out of the loop nowadays (I've stopped doing photography until a point when I can potentially build my own darkroom and make some prints), but looking at my photography stuff I have a box of Ektar 100 sitting out that's just about empty. I've tried several other types of film but I don't remember whether or not I developed any real preference.

Open file (49.96 KB 550x850 the new infinity cup.png)
/p/ for the Infinity Cup 2020! Photog 05/11/2020 (Mon) 22:11:20 No.29 [Reply]
As the title suggest, we're building up teams and rosters for the Infinity Cup 2020! We'd like it if you could join us. https://anon.cafe/p/
>>29 Thank you kindly for the invitation It happens that, even when we have a "legacy" name, we are probably mostly users who don't have extensive experience in the IB photography lingo or anything related, aka we are new at this and we are just building our own identity since the start of this month. These 30 posts you see are our first. I'm aware we need a crest, a starting XI with 6 subs and 2 sets of kits, sadly if we submit those it would be rushed and the names wouldn't really be rooted in our own culture. Basically if we go for it we would be a cheap plastic club like ManCity but without the money, so we will have to sadly decline this time. We are probably going to participate next year when are settled so be prepared, we will be the ominous dark horse unless you refball us.
>>30 > Basically if we go for it we would be a cheap plastic club like ManCity but without the money What an aptly made similitude. Aight, I hope to see you flourish as a board all the same.
dupl test

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms
Delete
Report

no cookies?