>>1434
>Moving to anon.cafe/loomis/ is not an option, because Loomis disliked this place for stealing all of the old 8chan.net/loomis/'s assets
What a bunch of drama, i thought he said it was okay because the original BO intended for this place to be a just-in-case bunker, not a copycat by the same name and assets. Not your fault tho.
>moving to another site still means that we are at someone's mercy
Sensible decision, understandable from most points.
>Thinking .moe was safe to begin with
Won't start sperging myself so i'll sidetrack this, but there's a reason this place still had some semblance of use despite the initial move.
Shows how much i don't know because by new site i thought it was .moe, this little island is isolated mind you, my distractions have been critical but at least i can see i could do nothing at all anyways other than the possible (and undesirable) pot stirring that doesn't and probably won't cross my mind.
Still, despite your position i have no harsh feelings and if something happens you can use this place as a bunker, because as far as i know it was initially supposed to be just that and then later used as a third base for those who disliked .moe and were left marooned after the Julay admin war.
I was supposed to be a caretaker along with Artchad, and at least from my part i can say we are still open if some of you fellows have a problem or want to curate stuff by using specific threads here, if anything i will strongly consider a visual re-tooling to separate ourselves as i see there were considerable problems due to being a direct and unsanctioned ramification of Loomis. Can't change the name because if i could i would now that i know this.
Thank you for your words too.
>>1429
Guess we will need a new CSS, bud, and a couple of new threads.