Okay, massive sage and gonna go make the fucking /ant/ thread the other strelok wanted. we can strike out text now????
Strelok, I know there's a shit ton of angry young men, but what are they going to do? Burn society down again and try to force women back into the kitchen make me a sammich
? That's not going to work long-term. Fuck, in chinese history one of the most successful chinese emperors would hang draw and quarter fucking eunichs (basically women) and his concubines who DARED influence politics and it still was the eventual cause of the end of the dynasty.
On top of that, the west deliberately marginalizes women who think they DARE need a man's help, unless they need it, then its because muh patriarchy. Both genders are like wheels on a cart, you cannot exist without the other Gattaca tier gene editing still doesn't negate the need for social development from both parents
>cart before the horse
I disagree. The issue is the fact they are supplanting religions, and their subsequent morals, for SCIENCE. You must not let religon inhibit your logic towards science, but rather let it be a guiding to an end goal. At the same time, I don't like any abrahamic religion, and I'd rather be daoist or a fucking sihk than a modern day buddhist Burma excepted for kebab removing abilities
or jain cuckhold. The romans did great things without christanity like nero and Vespasian burning jerusalem
Let us see where the modern day religons lead us:
>christanity is cucked beyond relief,
>Islam teaches you to be a pedo and a womanbeater, just like any good congressman
>judiasim deserves to be destroyed once again since the banks
>buddhists are pretty much pushovers like christans unless you're from burma
>Hindus are poo in the loo tier buddhists
>sihks have a child molester supposedly as leader religion concepts still pretty based
>daoisim is a way of life and the religon is cucked to the CCP
>tengri is a dying religon
>consummerisim is everywhere
confucianisim isn't a religon
In the vein of roman greek like gods that are still widely followed I can only see maybe Japanese/Korean folk being major enough in the first world countries chinese folk is larger but it's not a first world country
Hail to our new overload and spiritual leader jeff bezos?
They are two separate experiments, the well known set by Calhoun and a lesser known set by Alexander. Calhoun's experiments proved that overpopulation in a density results in "behavior sinks" which deviation from the norm causes societal collapse. The experiments by Alexander prove that social isolation (as in the vein of faux relationships like today) without spirtual strength (see irl hermits) leads to addiction, and that females are more addictive then males (which is important because they are the limit for reproduction in animals).
Think about it, we live in an age of artifically induced (COVID-19 BS) social isolation, in which the population is excessively medicated Anything not "normal" is an illness
and then increasingly conditioned to accept materialisim happiness" in addition to addiction to the old bread and circuses, and ever greated retarding of our rights under an increasingly centralized government. Don't forget the high ubranization causing increasing normalization of deviancy and behavioral sinks. This is a positive feedback loop.
The adaptation of chicago theory of economics to further gain monies and to medicate people so they don't deviate from the norm kills the soul, not the body. People exist to experience emotions and to make their own choices, not to be medicated the second they feel slightly unhappy so they can buy the newest xbone. Mark my words, in a decade or two they will have a test at pharmacies to gauge your dopamine/seratonin levels and medication to keep you "stable" will be over the counter.
>Alexander's experiments?? TFW you high on strelok?
We are living in a real world transition to Huxley's brave new world, the sexual "revolution" just accelerated it. Regarding relationships and monogamy, it is theoretically possible to have polygamous stable relationships, specifically certain types of polyandry (fraternal/ associated,Successional polygamy is INHERENTLY unstable) You have to have a place with extremely scarce natrual resources and a need for the physically stronger sex (men) to travel for trade at long times at a year as a prequisite, and for the males to be close relatives like brothers
as long term polygyny is inherently unstable in my personal understanding. But EITHER of these would require the destruction of the concept of western ideals as a whole since we value individualism so strongly (only need one jealous person to ruin the polygamy relationship).