I forgot to mention Check out Canadian Gun Nutz's Equipment Exchange or Gunpost if you want to score some decent firearms Be warned 1. Don't get scalped by money grubbing geezers 2. Always trust your gut if you think its a honeypot (ex. someone is selling a banned/prohibited firearm) The twats at the RCMP usually do this to entrap unwary fools 3. If you are selling, always ask the buyer for their PAL number (if they refuse, don't give them anything and cut ties with the so-called buyer)

https://archive.ph/X5hCK If weedman gets in on the 20th, it's then pretty much gonna be Australia-tier from here on.

>>18940 That fate is inevitable regardless of the election result. A Conservative minority means a left-wing majority and anything pro-gun would fail, and a Conservative majority is (or will soon be) impossible with modern Canadian demographics. And even if it were possible, AND the Tories managed to not be cucks long enough to actually use a majority to pass pro-gun laws, it'd only last one or two elections before the Liberals got in, reversed it, and added more restrictions than ever.

>>18598 >>https://www.howtogetagun.ca/ Looks like a good simple summary. It doesn't answer one question I've always had though. Is it legal for ranges in Canada to rent out firearms for people without licenses to try them at the range? The nearest range to me strictly bans non-members, never mind non-licensees, and its website claims that "All persons require a valid firearms licence to own or to use a firearm in Canada, or to acquire a firearm or ammunition by any means" (emphasis mine), but I thought I'd seen at least one or two mentions of ranges in bigger cities like Toronto that allowed it. I know I won't be able to get a license, because of the requirement to have character references, but I would like to try firing a gun one day, rather than just reading and watching videos about them on the internet.

>>18943 >That fate is inevitable regardless of the election result. O'Toole said he'll remove the OIC that was undemocratically passed and categorize funz by function. Essentially anon, if he manages to get in That is if the shitlibs don't cheat or pull some heel move he'll essentially be buying us time. And consider that Trudeau is already very unpopular among the working class and normalfags too means that this election just might be the chance where he's ousted. The CPC might be blue Liberals, but they're the only realistic option that is left. That being said, I think the PPC is a Liberal ploy to split the vote >>18947 >Is it legal for ranges in Canada to rent out firearms for people without licenses to try them at the range? Yes, but the one nearby me requires you to have a partner. I think you can guess why, so Average Suicidal Joe doesn't just come to the range, rent said gun, and become anhero with it Its mostly a liability reason from my guess. >The nearest range to me strictly bans non-members I'm guessing you're cursed to live Torcongo, by what I think you mean. I barely go to the range, and most of my shooting happens on crownland. >because of the requirement to have character references, You know you can use your parents for references aswell too. I used my two irl friends are refs>>18943

Speaking of the Canadian election, why is this photo so fucking funny?

Seriously, why is it so fucking funny? What is wrong with this country?

>>18949 >You know you can use your parents for references aswell too. Not if they think guns are evil and nobody, including me, should be allowed to own them. >requires you to have a partner. >I used my two irl friends are refs i guess there really are no options for someone with no IRL friends.

>>18940 So what you're saying is that Leafland will soon have a problem with "American Cartels" bringing guns over the border illegally and selling them to sandniggers and/or Chinese?

>>18953 Did you try your co-workers that think you're cool enough? By the way you can own antique revolvers without a PAL, anything that's blackpowder really. Hope you like casting and reloading. >https://www.oldgunscanada.com/swrussian48982 >>18951 >What is wrong with this country? Everything after 1965 apparently. >>18955 They already are. The (((Qui))) owned press just doesn't talk about it. Because that's how our glownigger patsy Wortmann managed to get them via Hell's Angels me thinks, or some other gang in Nova Scotia.

>>18951 >Bill Gates is the far right Canadian politician

>>18950 They look shopped there, like cardboard stand ups of themselves. Also that guy power posing with dirty shoes on a carpet is the epitome of North America.

O'Toole pussied out on the OIC. The CPC voter base clearly isn't taking O'Toole's retardation very well. Welp, I guess its clear that this country is assfucked to over 9000 levels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9qaU-hFM7E >2:10 - "We need more police" >3:00 - "More police resources, +200 RCMP officers for combatting drug and gun smuggling" >7:10 - "OIC ban and other bans will remain" >9:40 - Asks why changed mind and dodges question >11:16 - Confirms again OIC will remain in place >12:11 - Lies and says that he always said OIC would remain in place >13:20 - Dodges question about deal with CCFR, gives me hope but I doubt it >14:33 - Confirms again bans will stay >16:09 - Confirms again bans will stay, (Question mentions AR-15 and mini-14) >21:44 - Journos asks why we should trust him if hes reversing stance, dodges question >22:56 - Confirms again bans will stay >26:30 - Will not repeal C-71 and maintain restrictions >27:55 - "Point of review if maintaining ban?" Dodges question >29:06 - not important to guns but still funny how he wants to push China to "do better" Another fine example of why there's absolutely no political solution in this frozen shitpit.

>>18962 >Also that guy power posing with dirty shoes on a carpet is the epitome of North America. He also wants independence for Quebec. What did he mean by this?

>>18950 >>19011

>>19011 >>19012 >>18950 Canada too?

>>19013 Any british country has some sort of retarded shit like this. Maybe even Germany and france

>>19013 The British have a history of doing stuff like this. If anything I find it endearing when they emulate other cultures... Abroad, that is.

>>19013 >>19012 Strelok needs to understand true Classical Liberal Imperialist (British) culture to get it. Imperialist Britain never died. She simply went dormant during the currently awful long reign of the ruling monarch. When Britain establishes trade with a foreign country, she offers them one chance as equals. If they take the British people up on that, then the British people that take up the foreign exchange are expected to adopt that culture to search for any hidden clues into the sciences or religion that would benefit the home country. Part of this exchange as equals is allowing subcultures to develop in the metropolitan parts of Britain (such as London). If a country does not submit as equals, then the British would bulldoze them into submission and take their women to form a new, British-centric culture in that colony (such as India). It's sort of an overreaction caused by a certain spoiled child who wanted to break British treaties with the (good, mostly extinct) Native Americans and French (even if that child was correct in being rebellious about taxes). Funnily enough, this original British Imperialist culture lives on strongly in Labrador and Australia, of all places, but it is still present in the British political class.

>>19025 Ah, right, the way that Sikhs and Rapefugees come into this is that the Sikhs were one of the "as equals" castes, and rapefugees are a result of a perversion of this Imperialist doctrine by appealing to similar effects while ignoring the causes.

>>19025 It's a pretty similar doctrine to jewish merchants making hubs in important cities with roads to everywhere.

>>18950 >>18951 >why is this photo so fucking funny? It looks like a Star Trek teleport or the stage for a shitty game show. It's funny because it's fitting. >>19006 >Point of review if maintaining ban?" Dodges question Of fucking course. Just gimme my AR damn it.

>>18949 O'tools is backing out on an awful lot and it's extremely concerning. The liberals that I know are ditching the Liberals exactly because our PM is a liar, overtly corrupt, has no principles, and doesn't understand basic economics. O'tool starting to check off a lot of those same boxes and I don't want more of the same government.

>>18598 Time to get O'Tooled.

>>19086 Popular vote means nothing if the distribution is against you. Last polls I saw were predicting 5.8% for the Bloc, 5.3% for the PPC, and 3.0% for the Greens, nationally, but the same polls predicted the Bloc getting 26 seats, the Greens 1, and the PPC zero. The Conservatives are ahead in popular vote, but the Liberals have an edge in predicted seats.

>>18949 >>19031 >>19086 Burger here. From what I have read it sounds like he's not actually backing out, he's just going to repeal the undemocratic orders and allow legislation to be drafted instead with professionals in industry. If CanadaAnons believe professionals in industry will cuck, that's all there is to it, but it sounds like typical politicalspeak to make him more popular among centrists.

>>19086 >Such a low cultured country that they have to put their national "symbol" in basically all political parties Canada needs to accept that it's just North North America and that the only places that should be their own countries are Quebec, the Inuit territories and maybe the Atlantic Region.

>>19094 >The Inuit territories It will never happen. Canada doesn't talk about it, but they forcefully migrated the Inuit Northward in order to prevent their Southern brother from turning the Northwest Passage into an international sea trade route connecting London to Siberia. The Canadian military has been talking about putting forts along the entire passage lately because everyone except Canada recognizes that the Northwest Passage should be an international trade route and that we wouldn't need to import shit from Asia if it could be used.

>>19086 Time for a falseflag, goyim!

>>19110 What even happened? The CBC's new app isn't showing a headline about it at all and CTV's is only saying police are "investigating a file", but you don't evacuate multiple university campuses and issue shelter-in-place orders, and send in guys with this equipment just to "investigate a file".

>>19110 It sure is!

>>18950 >>18951

>>19167 Oh look, the polls have flipped. What a coincidence!

>>19170 Doesn't that trick ever get old? Commiefornia just did the same thing so Newsom can stay in power.

Democracy is fake and gay.