/k/ - Weapons, Combat, Outdoorsmanship


SAVE THIS FILE: Anon.cafe Fallback File v1.0 (updated 2021-01-10)

cafe/icup/: The GCUP is coming! Tentative Start Date - February 13th, 2021.

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 5120

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

Board Rules

(used to delete files and postings)

what's a war board without a conflict?

New Meta Thread Strelok Board owner 12/05/2020 (Sat) 21:51:10 No.10348
In an effort to stop posting meta in the /k/antina so Streloks can use it for its intended purposes, I'm establishing a new meta thread. The old one has been locked and I'll just let it gracefully fall off the board. IF YOU WANT TO COMMUNICATE WITH BOARD ADMINISTRATION (ME) POST IN THIS THREAD- I DON'T READ EVERYTHING ON THE BOARD. Volunteering REQUIREMENTS HAVE CHANGED SEE BELOW Volunteers are welcome to apply. e-mail answers to following statements >Your account name (required for all Lynxchan boards, unfortunately) >Timezones you'll be able to assist with >Previous experience, if any >specific topics you've got more interest in relevant to the board Communications powerwordN@cock.li in an attempt to increase transparency behind administrative action, moving forward posts that end up deleted or banned will be screenshotted and posted here along with ban duration and some explanation as to why. if you've had something you posted removed or been banned and do not see your post here, please e-mail me and i'll look into it. the reason for this is so the userbase can see what reasons people get banned and if they find said action disagreeable, tell me that i'm not doing my job correctly so as to improve and fix whatever the fuck is going on.
Edited last time by activeshooter on 12/11/2020 (Fri) 08:20:29.
>>10348 >Your account name (required for all Lynxchan boards, unfortunately) >unfortunately Does this imply that non-Lynxchan boards don't use accounts to log mods in? Of course they do. How else would restricted powers be granted by software? If the volunteers care about anonymity in their accounts they can just give themselves a very generic account name like kvol002. Seems more a matter of culture.
>>10379 JSchan software and infinitychan software have the board owner create accounts for the person in question instead of the other way around as lynxchan handles it.
Now that we have new management, can I get unbanned? Got a dumb ban just because of a disagreement back while the old BO was in charge. Having to phone post to get the ban id.
>>10392 You should stay banned until you learn how to reset your IP or use a fucking VPN. Let it be a lesson in basic opsec so you stop being an absolute fucking technological retard you phone posting faggot.
>>10392 You really should know how to reset your IP or use a VPN, but I've gone ahead and wiped the slate clean and lifted all bans* as a sign of good faith. Please don't make me regret doing so, anons.
Edited last time by Kubeman on 12/06/2020 (Sun) 11:54:52.
>>10401 Thanks, m8. I'll look into it.
>>10403 Also, any good VPNs you'd recommend? I'm doubtful of most of them.
>>10405 https://restoreprivacy.com/ is a good first stop, but it's not an end-all be-all. ProtonVPN for instance will ban your account just for visiting /fascist/. In general any of the more popular VPNs are fucking worthless because they have "hate speech" clauses in their terms of use. You're likely going to have to pay for anything halfway decent, but always double check for the hate speech clause in their ToS since they don't have to offer you a refund if you happen to violate it and most want you to pay for a full year upfront. Of course depending on how they log their data that clause might not matter since they might not be able to actually prove it was you. It depends entirely on methodology. I've had no problems with hide.me, but it's not a comprehensive VPN and is likely banned on most imageboards.
>>10379 >still using that ugly jpg you make me mad
Restating my intent from the America/Europe thread since it was unclear this morning. >If you are discussing race in the context of race riots, ethnic tensions, etc. relevant to the topic at-hand, it is A-Okay. >If you are making an informative post about the history of two races and their interactions in the context of a race-related conflict, it is A-Okay. >If you are posting light-hearted bantz at each other and race comes up it is A-Okay. >If you are cracking jokes about race, it is A-Okay. >If you come in talking about how you must preserve the white race for the future of our children, >>>/fascist/ and a rule 8. >If you come in shitting up the thread with identity politics where they don't belong, >>>/fascist/ and a rule 8. >If you think every topic has to be about the white race because white white white white something white white fuck every other ethnicity, >>>/fascist/ and a rule 8. >Similarly if you think every topic has to be about how terrible whites are, >>>/fascist/ and a rule 8. Is this more clear? Politics are a natural part of gun culture and I expect them to come up which is why the rule is about tangentially related politics, not a "no politics" rule. Shilling /pol/shit is not welcomed as that is not the audience I seek to attract nor to moderate. I haven't browsed /pol/ since 2016 and I'm not interested in moderating a board being astroturfed by /pol/ anons when there is a perfectly valid /pol/ proxy on this website as our next door neighbor. Ideally I would like to not rock the boat for anon and believe he is capable of honoring a gentleman's agreement to see /k/ as a board of relatively open discussion, but if the choice comes between allowing /pol/ to astroturf or taking a harder stance that leaves the board with a smaller, more stable community that can take it easy, I will choose the latter every time.
>>10603 Looks like you’re trying hard to paint /fascist/ as the big boogieman
Open file (144.55 KB 764x960 a few good men.jpg)
>>10605 I believe identity politics belongs on a board about identity politics, and to my limited understanding of how the board functions/the type of people who browse it, /fascist/ is the spiritual successor to /pol/. If the /fascist/ BO disagrees with my statement I am willing to take down mentions of /fascist/ and apologize to him for doing so. There will always be some overlap in topics since race, guns, and politics are intertwined, but I believe good fences make good neighbors and that I need to lay down the foundations for a good fence. Here's an edit as proof this is me.
Edited last time by Kubeman on 12/09/2020 (Wed) 03:13:26.
Open file (6.70 KB 226x223 1607030348223.png)
>>10603 Wow haha actually pathetic. Imagine nuking a thread over nothing, you might as well just have been the last BO. You just had to flex your power toolz because race for whatever reason is something extremely disconcerting to you, that you absolutely hate being discussed(why?). Even though we were talking about how non-whites are overwhelmingly SUPPORTERS OF GUN CONTROL. You're just a typical wordbending little hypocritic tapeworm that just got some clout which means willing to bend rules exactly how you see fit, based on your feelings only of course. How convenient that you are just like the last guy. even though the thread in question was political, and was race related. You had to sperg out over nothing you absolute fucking faggot.
>>10608 Only posts tangentially related to the meta post in that thread were deleted.
I want the old BO back, to think that it could have gotten even worse
>>10610 Guess we're just all going to the fascist thread after all then lmao >>10609 Literally caught so hard lying >>10610, faggot
Open file (115.43 KB 1000x362 putsch soon.jpg)
>>10610 He is welcome to have the board back after resting for a bit if he wants it back, though that will likely result in the removal of the America/Europe thread since I will not stick around to moderate in such a scenario. I'm here to ensure that /k/ does not become /pol/ and that the anon.cafe site owner does not need to delete it due to global rule violations. Anyone else who is interested in having the board is welcome to become a volunteer and go through screening for a few weeks to make sure they aren't a schizo. Full disclosure: 1) I work for a three letter agency, though I will not say for who or what I do for my own OpSec/safety. There's a reason I do everything through tor/VPNs. 2) While I am far-right, I am firmly in the purple square if you have to use the meme compass. I have sympathy for NatSocs but I do not share their belief systems. 3) I am an unwilling BO and am making the best of a shitty situation/taking responsibility until I can find a replacement. 4) I have a vested personal interest in keeping /k/ accessible and visible since the existence of /k/ on alternate imageboards directly benefits me. 5) If I can not find a suitable replacement before March, I will let the board default (likely meaning its deletion) under the assumption that no one cared about it enough to take it over. The discussion was deleted because it was an entire discussion about my meta post. Discuss it here in this thread instead of shitting up that thread. Can we go about our day or do you have any more questions/accusations?
>>10612 > I work for a three letter agency, though I will not say for who or what I do Aight, I’m not gonna post on this shithole againc wewwww
>>10613 As the main troublemaker, you will not be missed.
>>10612 Nah, I’ll make your life hell and spam niggers daily
>>10603 The was no need to nuke the thread dude. >>10612 Nuance is too much for them, though you've been fanning the flames a bit as well.
>>10617 Nuking the thread was a bit extreme, but I don't particularly believe anything of value was lost. I'll apologize for not showing more prudence, but I saw this flashpoint coming from a mile away so I was putting down the boot hard, hence fanning the flames. I'll refrain from doing it again in the future unless necessary assuming the site owner hasn't removed me by tomorrow morning.
>>10618 You’re shit at your job, tranny
Open file (748.04 KB 659x609 BaskingATF.gif)
>>10618 If you already knew it was extreme, why in the ever loving fuck did you still do it anyway? A good half of those posts were thread related or had thread related talk - not just meta shit. Playing loose and/or heavy with the rules you have laid out at your own discretion reduces the integrity of them. You say you'll refrain from doing it again; that is great and all, but you have already set a bad precedent. Now, regardless of how you try handle the fallout from it, people are not going to put a lot of faith in your ability to properly differentiate correct and incorrect following of the rules you have set forward on inclusion of race into threads. On a separate and lighter note, I think (ignoring this incident) that you have managed to be an okay BO for now. As long as you don't become the overbearing pos the last guy was, maybe you'll even breathe some new life back into the board. You just need to don your ghillie suit and become the BO no one notices but everyone knows is still here by the occasional tracks and casings you leave.
Open file (4.58 MB 1949x1280 killing fields.png)
>>10622 >You just need to don your ghillie suit and become the BO no one notices but everyone knows is still here by the occasional tracks and casings you leave. That's the plan moving forward since I hate trip codes anyways. I'm off to watch some anime for an hour and pass the fuck out since it's 1AM.
Open file (119.66 KB 1031x795 beatings.jpg)
>>10622 God fucking damnit, can't we make a week at least? >>10618 There's no need to nuke a thread when you can simply live and let live. Should've let it die; now the schizo strelok is going to sperg out like a fucking terry. Does anyone have the CIA NIGGERS GLOW IN THE DARK video by chance?
>>10625 It'll be fine. Don't even give him the time of day. Honestly don't even acknowledge his existence. Those sorts thrive on undue attention. Just go about your day normally.
>>10618 >>10622 if you don't manage to delete an offtopic derailing post in the first 5 minutes of seeing it, then just leave it and the resultant conversation. going back and "sanitizing" will only annoy the people who were talking with each other.
>>10612 > I work for a three letter agency YOU USED THE MONKEY'S PAW /k/. YOU GOT WHAT YOU WISHED FOR.
Open file (4.91 MB 3408x3624 ClipboardImage.png)
>>10623 >disclosing timezone
>>10612 LONDON O N D O N
Open file (101.40 KB 480x640 you just run em over.jpg)
>>10618 >no fun allowed >do not bring up the elephant in the room of browns overwhelmingly anti-gun >glownigger >politics ok but only if kosher and toothless
Just want AusCunt BO back, but that'll never happen ay :^(
>>10622 >don your ghillie suit and become the BO no one notices but everyone knows is still here by the occasional tracks and casings you leave. Excellent way to put it
>>10392 >Now that we have new management I 've been gone a few weeks, do we have a new BO or did Cafe change hands?
>>10612 >I work for a three letter agency, though I will not say for who or what I do for my own OpSec/safety. Oh fuck look out everyone, it's the DOL!
>>10672 Glowniggers took over /k/
Open file (326.88 KB 1120x704 slayers.jpg)
>>10672 Long story short I asked to make an alternate board and instead the BO handed the keys over last weekend due to some incidents, so I've been making an effort to revamp/revitalize the place until I can find a suitable replacement. Some topics that were banned before are allowed now, rules are overall more relaxed but have changed. Some goblins from /fascist/ are upset that I told them to get back in their stinking holes instead of letting them shit up the board with identity politics. Meta thread is more or less free game (only rule 11 and rule 3 is enforced in this thread), so the above is the aftermath. The rest is in my posts above. Welcome back, dude.
>>10677 >blaming /fascist/ again Hello, kike
Open file (451.49 KB 461x577 black mesa.png)
>>10677 >muh /fascist/ >posting nudoom guy in slayers.jpg You are gay.
alright fuckers old BO is back as always, conflict provides a useful route for change. rules for the board have been altered, see new rules thread if you have questions regarding policy, what to post, whether you think certain rules need to be changed, or whether my actions need to change, do so in this thread. i've only ever run one board and generally don't know what I'm doing, so you really can make a change if you want by just telling me to do something. a board is nothing without its userbase. also noticed a lot of people want to try their hand at running the board. this is great and i'd be happy to see you guys apply as volunteers. if things go smoothly, transitioning board leadership in a more orderly way than just throwing a hot potato into someone's lap can be had.
>>10683 That's not going to solve the issue. People are still going to bitch and spam because of politics being in /k/ and vice versa. On the other hand, I'm not sure what method to prevent blatant political posting I am, to a degree, sympathetic to saging since I do it sometimes as well. Where are the other jannies?
>>10683 also, zchan has a new /k/ board up and running. i've added the link to their board in the pinned meta thread. if you guys want to use zchan instead with Sturgeon (site owner) running the show, then head over there. i know that to many people, my leadership was unpopular. i'll try to change but at the same time I understand that trust is a difficult thing to regain. even if it's impossible to keep track of, I can promise that I won't try to fuck with migration efforts to another board or site and have already spoken with anon.cafe admin staff regarding this
I've seen some confusion about the earlier denials of service that occurred at the same time that /k/ was deleted. We were not the subject of a DDoS attack (Distributed Denial of Service where many remote hosts attempt to flood a host with traffic) but rather a DoS exploit (Denial of Service, which means any exploit that prevents a server from fulfilling its function). We are protected against DDoS attacks by our provider (indeed, they have already mitigated a few against us without anyone noticing) but DoS exploits targeted flaws within LynxChan itself. We're presently mitigating those, so please pardon any bumps in the road in the mean time.
>>10686 I disagree with the reimplimentation of the original board owner back in as the host of this board, I get he's a global vol (at least, to my memory), but at the same time it will cause people who disagree to simply argue that "it's back to the old faggot" again. I'd rather have a new BO than an old one since we'll go through some uncertainy (I'm not sure if the board will survive in the current state).
>>10687 i was made a global volunteer as part of the requirement for moving to anon.cafe from julayworld, so as to help delete spam or CP links on other boards. i don't know if there's ban or delete logs readily available, but people are free to check them if so to see where/if i've been fucking with stuff
>>10688 I'm not aware of any logs. Perhaps it is in the boards best intrests to post the takedowns/bans into Meta and as to why.
>>10689 https://anon.cafe/logs.js this shows global deletion stuff, whether it's attached media or posts. if you guys would prefer, i can screenshot shit i end up deleting or banning along with posting the reason why in this thread.
>>10687 Perhaps, but to us that is neither here nor there. We consider it a matter for /k/ to resolve itself. We chose to restore control to the old BO because situations where we pick a new BO are essentially a roulette where the chosen new candidate may immediately delete the board or otherwise be a bad actor. Consider that as bad as you consider the old-new-new BO, he did voluntarily hand over control when popular opinion turned against him, and the replacement turned out to be worse. >>10689 Logs for boards are up next to the "Catalog" link. /k/'s are at https://anon.cafe/logs.js?boardUri=k
>>10691 >logs link That's my bad. I forgot about it. Sorry.
>>10683 >>10684 To prevent future internet slapfights, now would be the time to define exactly what /k/ is and isn't. Weapons are certainly /k/, the places where they are used are also /k/. As Clausewitz said, "War is the continuation of politics by other means.", however, going with this train of thought leaves /k/ as a political board with an emphasis on guns, which it isn't. War cannot exist without politics and the same is not true of politics, which would do just fine without war. In my opinion, topics become unrelated to /k/ when they are not related to a: weapons (tanks, swords, guns, etc.) or b: armed conflict/glownigger ops. No matter what this definition ends up being, it must be written in language clear and understandable to every Strelok.
>>10693 Addendum: Better definition for category b would be "The places weapons are used or discussed"
>>10693 >To prevent future internet slapfights, now would be the time to define exactly what /k/ is and isn't. this cant ever be exact since the topic of gun ownership and laws is inherently political. however I think that anons should ask themselves twice if they should post something. problem is that a few tend to go overboard and this is detrimental to a topic. a thread about body armor doesnt need much politics if at all, folks should really keep it at that on the other hand BO should give us some leeway if it doesnt hurt the thread, maybe give people just a friendly headsup to stay on topic instead of delteing posts. Strict rules are not helpful.
>>10695 to be clear- i'm not going to delete posts about political discussion or board unrelated in an existing thread or in new threads. the idea is that imageboards are supposed to be a vehicle for anonymous discussion. preventing discussion is against the point. the objective is to avoid having a board centered around armed conflict and the tools utilized in them become a platform for predominantly news or keeping up with current events. this ideal requires participation by both myself and the board users in deciding what to respond to and what not to. if someone ends up making a thread about the litigation efforts in Georgia, the way for the userbase to "delete" this content is by not bumping the thread and it'll eventually slide off into oblivion, rather than report -> "yeah this is offtopic" -> delete -> censorship. if people end up regularly using such threads, i'd rather have people able to talk than not, although the old solution on julay/8ch would be to move the thread over to /news/, /pol/, etc. can't be done here and there isn't an equivalent board, although i'm hoping zchan sets up some functional analogue so there ends up being a place to actually talk PURE HARD FACTS AND LOGIC POLITICS
Open file (657.18 KB 1412x2000 wormfood.jpeg)
>decide to do an all nighter watching Wagner's Ring cycle >after that end up knocked out for a good 16 hours >wake up >old BO is new again, there is some talks of an attack and lots of posts are missing So what happened exactly? Was it so much spam the previous BO couldn't keep up with? Or did he sabotage the board?
>>10693 check out the updated rules thread and see if it meshes with what you're trying to say >>10697 that's pretty sick dude the new BO, kubeman, deleted the board after anon.cafe got ddosed and some guy kept spamming niggers. relevant threads here >>>/shelter/2787 >>>/fascist/14422
Edited last time by activeshooter on 12/11/2020 (Fri) 09:55:49.
Open file (86.47 KB 700x700 kyouko_tired.jpg)
I just wanted to talk about battleships.
>>10698 Those or not very informative, although it's mostly because my mind automatically filters out posts that include ˝lol˝, ˝kek˝, ˝seethe˝, etc. Still, from what I can gather it looks like our local friendly ATF agent couldn't keep up with the pressure.
>>10685 You were perfectly fine
>>10693 >>10695 >>10696 It's a place for black supremacists to tell whitey to let themselves be replaced by nigger, a lot of anons sperged out when such a post was deleted so i can only assume that's what they want.
This is a test message. If you're seeing this properly than I'm the new janny. Just wanted to let you know that I exist so you can yell at me if I do anything wrong. We'll see where we go from here, but I'm sure many streloks are tired of this drama. I do not work for a three letter agency, I am neither a britbong who has a loicense fetish, and I am not a tranny. You can't contact me on IRC, Discord, or any other shit socials because I don't have one. If you wish to contact me post in the meta thread, and I will redress any issues you may have semi-frequently. >>10701 >not informative No screencaps since I was asleep at work actually.... while the site got deleted. But let me try to give you a quick rundown. >2nd BO (refered to as "kubeman" for clarity) admitted to working as a glow and also said he was Britbong >It didn't go over well with some of the other streloks here was to say an understatement. >kubeman nuked the rioting 4.0 USA/Europe thread because he it was too off topic and because oi there's no loicense on politics just added fuel to the fire. >Then person(s) came on and spammed the board. I'm not sure if anything signifigant happened between that and the kubeman deleting the board. >??? - (Probably want to ask others) >kubeman deleted the board > >>>/shelter/2787 used as a temporary backup, zzzchan spawns their own /k/, we'll figure out the relationship between the boards later but it seems like it's not gotten much activity (neither has this one). >board was restored to activershooter, the original BO of /k/ when it was first created off the jujulay migration. >pic completely unrelated That is all I have to say, good hunting streloks. edited by myself for being a complete fucking dumbass and forgetting to press enter.
Edited last time by zergfacecultist on 12/11/2020 (Fri) 16:35:02.
So how long until /k/ gets another issue?
>>10717 I was one of the people originally butthurt with the old BO, and all of my concerns are literally nothing before the shitshow we just had, so I don't see any problems arising unless something egregious happens.
>>10714 Are you the chink you type like him and used a brown man gif
>>10717 Not long >>10719
>>10714 >he was a britbong First I've heard of that.
>>10719 What in the everloving fuck? The site says that post was written by me, even though I have no memory of that. And I wouldn't type like a nigger in the first place.
>>10723 My guess, perhaps you somehow had the same IP as the earlier strelok before who posted after the address changed? Possible but unlikely. That, or you were high and wasted or you're the schizo poster. I >>10719 >gif Pretty sure that gifs been around since before the old infinitychan nuke.
so we stay?
>>10729 >pic You should leave, tranny
>>10730 Says the goon
>>10730 >i hate fun
>>10723 You're not alone i'm also seeing a lot of "you"s all over.
>>10730 this is an anime board, faggot
>>10748 You will never be a woman.
Open file (49.27 KB 184x184 a toast to (you).png)
>>10693 >>10696 >>10698 Item 4 of the rules along with the definition of "offtopic" is ideal; succinct, flexibility for edge-cases along with the tried and true: "If you have to ask, you shouldn't." Good work BO.
>>10749 we all become little girls when we are on the internet
>>10754 Fags like you do
I just noticed what I hope isn't actually a pattern. Testing something in regards to the (you) issue after it popped up out of nowhere.
>>10780 Oh, that is interesting. There appears to be a correlation between getting random (you)s appearing, and whether or not you've used tor from your device. It could just be that though, correlation without any actual reasoning behind it. I suggest anon clear his cache as it could also just be an issue of how the board recognizes (you) and clearing the cache should force it to disassociate you/your browser from the (you)s it generates.
Open file (26.21 KB 704x213 12-14-20.PNG)
>ban duration: 1 week >reason: discord trying to avoid permabanning people, even if it's something like spamming. the reason is that odds are this fool is using a VPN and by banning the IP, it means a different strelok that may be using the same VPN wouldn't be able to post with it later.
Open file (14.45 KB 730x563 1424818454300.png)
>>10693 To take a page out of the /tg/ guys playbook; i.e. /k/ is about the people who are autisticly into militaria.
I have a proposal for a new rule. Give a temporary ban and edit posts of anyone who says anything good about the US or anything ever produced by it. The US must be insulted all the time.
>>10855 you'll have to uninstall hearts of iron IV permanently for that to pass krautanon, are you prepared to make the final volkerssacrificeberg for the good of germany
so with weekend at bernies brain dead biden getting muppeted by some bitch who wants to put everybody in jail getting elected president and pornhub getting shoah'd how long do you think we got before they come for this place
Open file (27.68 KB 624x147 ALPHAMODMAKER.png)
Everyone said they wanted transperency so I guess I'll post this and see where we go with this. To the strelok(s) that reported >>10871 >>10874 >>10872 >>10869 I've closed the reports, the threads been derailed to high heaven before that. Yes, it is obvious shitposting, but at the same time you did ask for less moderation on political sperging Your best bet is to not reply to them. Some are also "technically" on tangent (>>10875 and 10871) since it says >Why do you hate him I've closed the reports, but the BO is free to reverse my ruling. Keep in mind we're working with new rules here, so that's that. >reee I disagreee! vol is shit!!!! I've tagged the BO on this post as well so I guess you could complain jannie man bad. >>10885 See above. Are we still making fun of all the krauts for the spregkraut who doxxed himself on the cafe? Have a stalker modding joke since we're still figuring out the boundaries and I'm still new at this moderation stuff
>>10902 Cross-boarders are going to kill this site. The alternate history thread made by the nya~ fag having shown up at all was a sign of the end.
>>10922 Cross-boarders are going to kill this board, but it's certainly not the boards posting anime girls that are going to do it. Have an anime girl to stay triggered.
Open file (26.53 KB 353x562 12-17-20.PNG)
>ban dsuration: none >reason: spam deleted some shit from a guy trying to get a GET. isn't it cheating if you need to fill out ~30 posts?
>>10993 You aren't a problem because you aren't a pseudo-namefag.
>>10922 I fail to see what problems anime brings to the board. If any thing, It increases the quality of the board.
>>11137 Refer to >>11125
>ban duration: None >reason: Posting serial number (and thus personable indefinable information) Streloks, I will kindly remind you again, that a SERIAL NUMBER is considered PERSONAL INFORMATION because they CAN trace you through it!!! The picture in question could not be removed separate of the post >>11151 has been deleted and replaced with a censored one at >>11156. Edit: Because for some reason I posted before I intended. Fuck you keyboard
Edited last time by zergfacecultist on 12/19/2020 (Sat) 03:48:54.
The getting mad about anime schtick is retarded, fuck off with it, it's not like every post is a cartoon either you histrionic mongoloid. I don't know if you're some wayward /tv/ tranny stirring shit up or what but anime was posted on 8/k/ with zero issue, and same goes for webring /k/ until you stuck your shitstirring dramanigger schnoz into it you fucking nigger.
>>11209 t. cock-sucking sissy
Open file (114.90 KB 1434x1080 onizujew.jpg)
>>11209 >schtick >schnoz Settle down yid nobody is taking your consumer cartoons away
>>11212 That is a pretty high Yiddish : English ratio tbh
Oh boy, now that some faggot retard's bit the b8 the tranny squad is gonna use chinese cartoons as a point of contention whenever someone posts a reaction image. Why are nu-anons so fucking garbage?
>>11214 Seethe
Open file (7.03 KB 548x114 12-19-20PNG.PNG)
>ban duration on one of the ips: 4 hr >reason: spam, also rule 4 left the posts in the meta thread up violates rule 4 as responding to anime images isn't relevant to the board's topic and posting the phrase >cuckime while replying to posts in other threads counts as carrying over a discussion.
Looks like /tv/ has turned their discord addled faces our way again.
Open file (15.91 MB 1920x1080 Katyusha.mp4)
Open file (3.83 MB 568x360 Gachi tankers.mp4)
Reports on >>11217, >>10954, and >>10927 have been closed for not being an actionable offense. This is more of a proposed rule clarification but I'll leave it up here for the BO and other to see and act on: >follow global rules One of the global rules is post "nothing illegal in Romania" I suggest we write the one other law that may be of interest to streloks because they may fall under these quite frequently when it comes to shitting on governments and the people who reside in them is Article 368 (1): >The act of urging the audience verbally, in writing or by any means, to commit offenses punishable with imprisonment from three months to three years or with a fine not to exceed the penalty provided by law for the offense to commit which was instigated. video completely unrelated, enjoy.
When do we install Mark's new bitcoin miner to deter spam?
>>11311 I'd prefer the zzz captcha, niggerpill still has trouble getting past it.
Open file (49.75 KB 500x417 Christmas in Vukovar.jpg)
Happy winter holidays streloks, depending on if you're a good old christfag, or some pagan believer from /fascist/, or an atheist the name of the holiday may vary. PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING BELOW CAREFULLY. THESE ARE SITE ADMINISTRATION STANCES ON INTERPRETATIONS OF ROMANIAN LAWS Unfortunately, not all things are jovial at this time of year. I have received a reply from the site administration regarding Romanian civil code 368, 369, 47, and 438. The detailed summary can be seen at >>>/meta/13836 and >>>/meta/13837 . In short: There is a distinction between incitement and instigation and this applies to speech differently. "Public Instigation of a crime" that is "to commit offenses shall be punishable by no less than 3 months and no more than 3 years of imprisonment or by a fine". The site administration has ruled that there must be a specific threat (as noted in the civil code) in addition to the incitement. >tl;dr: Can I still say "gas the jews" or "kill the chinks" now? >Yes, but don't say "Gas the jews at XYZ location now" In order for a threat to be specific, it needs to be directed with location at minimum and possibly time if it is some sort of one time event. "Inciting the public" is also prohibited. >Inciting the public, using any means, to hatred or discrimination against a category of individuals shall be punishable by no less than 6 months and no more than 3 years of imprisonment or by a fine. There is no definition of the word "incitement" in the code, and thus the ruling is application of a dictionary definition of the word: >incite: to encourage someone to do or feel something unpleasant or violent, or to cause violent or unpleasant actions Unfortunately this is a relatively broad statue, the same "gas the jews" or anything that would belong on 8cuck /pol/ may qualify. /k/ is not a politics board, so I don't really expect this to be an issue. It is, still, in my opinion, unconstitutionally broad but I that is the price of being hosted in Romania. >tl;dr Don't glowpost EDIT: FORGOT A > to the cross quote. NIGGER TIER MOMENT HERE. SORRY
Edited last time by zergfacecultist on 12/25/2020 (Fri) 08:57:03.
Open file (24.88 KB 1142x288 12-26-20.PNG)
>>11448 has been merged into the QTDDTOT thread (>>7036). You could also make the argument that it belongs in >>4526 but I think it would be better under QTDDTOT.
>>11387 >inciting the public Pls no bully if this is a dumb question, but do niggerpill's calls for mass suicide fall under that rule?
Open file (34.27 KB 413x176 12-28-20.PNG)
Open file (47.49 KB 689x186 12-28-20-2.PNG)
>reason: shilling outside IB >duration: 1 week
Report on >>11481 has been closed for not being actionable. I suggest you once again, just to ignore the insults being levied as they are neither spamming nor breaking any other rules. >>11464 >question It's a long fucking answer. /meta/ BO has not responded, probably because they were too busy trying to figure out how to decline hosting the loli board at >>>/meta/13852 This is my take as a vol and I may be overruled by the board owner here, or the globals, but I will define my understanding here: Romanian law does not criminalize suicide, however Romanian code 191 states: >(1) An act of determining or facilitating the suicide of an individual, if the suicide has taken place, shall be punishable by no less than 3 and no more than 7 years of imprisonment. >(2) When the act specified by par. (1) was committed against a juvenile between 13 and 18 years of age or against a person having a reduced competence, the penalty shall be no less than 5 and no more than 10 years of imprisonment. >(3) Determining or facilitating the suicide of a underage person who did not reach the age of 13 or of a person who was unable to realize the consequences of their actions or inactions or to control them, if suicide has taken place, shall be punishable by no less than 10 and no more than 20 years of imprisonment and a ban on the exercise of certain rights Definition of determining >causing something to occur or be done in a particular way; serving to decide something. Definition of facilitating >make (an action or process) easy or easier. I am unable to find Romanian court case work here. But it is likely to be more restrictive than American Common law, which as usual has a circuit split (and varies by state). I cite: State v. Melchert-Dinkel, 844 N.W.2d 13, 24 (Minn. 2014) >"Speech in support of suicide, however distasteful, is an expression of a viewpoint on a matter of public concern, and, given current U.S. Supreme Court First Amendment jurisprudence, is therefore entitled to special protection as the ‘highest rung of the hierarchy of First Amendment values'" Commonwealth v. Carter, 52 N.E.3d 1054, 1056 (Mass. 2016) >“The grand jury could have found that an ordinary person under the circumstances would have realized the gravity of the danger posed by telling the victim, who was mentally fragile, predisposed to suicidal inclinations, and in the process of killing himself, to get back in a truck filling with carbon monoxide and ‘just do it.’” Giboney v. Empire Storage and Ice Co. >"for example, the Court rejected the contention that 'speech or writing used as an integral part of conduct in violation of a valid criminal statute' enjoys constitutional protection." Therefore, context matters in American Jurisdiction, federal courts appear to be silent on the issue (but you will likely still be extradited for muh PR). If you know someone is reasonable likely to commit suicide (based on the average person, and not the image board definition of "average"), you should not post them to kill themselves. For example, some dumbass like the one on 4cuck who livestreamed his an hero with a shotgun, you probably shouldn't tell him to kys. In addition, Romanian law bans specific threats, therefore, I would expect the post to fulfill the following critera: 1) It is specific and directed to someone or a specific organization, 2) It has a logical and plausible way of execution AND/OR 3) The person them-self is likely to commit suicide on review by the average person. tl;dr Don't bait someone who's suicidal, and don't give a specific course with a plausible method to a specific group/person. Talking about historical events is of course, not illegal.
Edited last time by zergfacecultist on 12/29/2020 (Tue) 23:08:50.
Open file (76.99 KB 905x172 1-1-21.PNG)
>reason: shilling outside IB >duration: 1 Day since its new years, upped to 1 week if they post again.
Can we finally get rid of the robot?
>>11591 Why do they do it janny-kun?
>>11639 has been merged into >>4526. Edit: On second review, >>11639 >>11642 >>11643 >>11650 >>11650 >>11651 has been merged into >>11641 >reason: not clearing EXIF data, spamming, needs to lurk more. >ban duration, 1 day I was originally not going to ban them at all and warn him to lurk more but the EXIF data being present really took the cake. If this was /tech/ I'd have perma'd him for the EXIF violation and the fact he uses an apple device to post My apologizes for not saving a picture.
Edited last time by zergfacecultist on 01/04/2021 (Mon) 17:02:56.
>reason: CP >duration: 1 month not posting image for obvious reasons
First off, the site-wide administration has made a fallback file. I strongly suggest you download and save this file in case something happens. >>>/meta/13858 The welcome pin has been edited to reflect this. The announcement will revert back to the original in 3 days. I strongly suggest that we decide on a bunker (I propose two, a US based an non-US based bunker ideally) and I nominate our sister board http://zzzchan.xyz/k since it already exists It uses cloudflare though I think or https://late.city/ It seems to fly under the radar, let me know if it glows since I just looked for smaller site on the webring and just picked by dice roll. zzzchan seems to be hosted in the US and late.city is hosted in Vancouver I think. Report on >>11931 has been closed as it does not break any rules. >>11980 has been merged into >>7036 as it is basically a QTDDTOT question. No ban has been placed. Sorry for this absolute shit of redditspacing but this was the best method of formatting it I could think of.
Edited last time by zergfacecultist on 01/10/2021 (Sun) 21:21:48.
>>11993 late.city has been around for ages, but they might not appreciate /k/ crashing on their couch. I know some of the administration over there and they're good folks. Libertarian-leaning, but they don't mind nigger jokes and the like. I'd check with them first to make sure that's ok.
>>12005 Reached out to the late.cafe and zzzchan boards via email. I'll post the responses soon. Still open to any other suggestions.
The zzzchan admin has agreed to host a bunker board. No news from late. Any other suggestions?
>>12092 I actually think we won't have problems here, the libs have the scent of blood in the water and are going after the big fish. We're too small for their appetites now
>>12139 Probably not, but not being prepared is still dumb as fuck. All it takes is one persistent CP posting shithead to ruin it.
Open file (44.77 KB 1886x725 1-19-21.PNG)
>>12146 If there are no objections and the BO agrees I'll start the process sometime later this week assuming the 20th isn't a fireworks show >>12348 You do realize the rules literally have my hands tied even if I wanted to right? I've just closed >>12270 >>12335 >>12344 because there's nothing objectionable about it rules wise. The only remotely questionable one is >>12331 for being offtopic regarding stronk wamen indoctrination which belongs on fucking >>>/fascist/ or >>>/pol/ if you are a cuckchanner. offense: Offtopic on America/Europe thread >action: A big scary useless like gun free zone warning post has been posted with a 1 day ban applied to the poster in question. Continued saging by others will result in a non-permanent ban. >pic related I am honestly not so sure about it (this being an issue) since this isn't a lighting fast derail that hits the bump limit, but the site posting has been relatively slow compared to the old days on infinitycuck, but the offtopic rule hasn't been enforced as much as it should be and needs to be enforced. If this was the before Walmart deplatform on the old infinitycuck, yes, the BO would have banned one of those people for being a complete moronic imbecile. No, those aren't the rules here. If you want them to be the rules go bother the BO on this thread to change them. Edit: Day, not minute. Need a coffee. Edit 2: Changed >>12338 to >>12331 because my brain wasn't found while typing this post up.
Edited last time by zergfacecultist on 01/19/2021 (Tue) 13:09:55.
>>12356 >The only remotely questionable one is >>12338 for being offtopic regarding stronk wamen indoctrination That post is in the /k/anteen, and it's not even connected to the Europe/America thread, where the ˝discussion˝ about high heels was going on.
>>12357 My bad. I'll edit it since I'm obviously being retarded. Thanks for the spot. Shut up Now let me wallow in shame.
Open file (162.04 KB 500x500 Elaina_horrified.gif)
>>12359 >Shut up Rude. Now I have no other choice but to point out that >>12270 was reported because it was meant to be a reply >>12265 but ended up in a completely wrong thread. >webm Is it even humanly possible to make such a low quality webm in this day and age?

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms

Captcha (required for reports)

no cookies?