>You don't assimilate by flooding a european country with asian genetics.
First off, genghis khan exists, by this logic Europeans have already died when the huns and mongols came.
> Jean Raspail
I have not read him unfortunately, information is hard to come by when you're stuck in a liberal college town and the current year professor dare not to question. I did a quick skim of his work and I'll need to add that to my reading list (if the kikepedia summary is to be trusted, I would agree with most of the statements if anyone has a pdf copy I'd be happy
. I have read Spengler, Huntington, Schlesinger and Putnam Putanms paper is E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first Century if you want to know
The chinese aren't invading the country, as a matter of fact, due to the aging population back on the mainly the chinese government is attempting (read: "convincing") people to come back if they were chinese born and keeping them from leaving. They are also loosing the culture war really badly. Break up the asian monolith into seperate blocks. Fuck, Iranians are considered white by the census for some dumbass reason. There's a big difference in the ethnicities even within China (some are more pro-european than others), the same applies to Asia as a whole Also, I know that white people not being able to tell differences is a thing, but I never seem to have issues guessing the ethnicity of europeans
>hapa kids having mental issues
I have a guess as to why, although I didn't meet a hapa until college in the US I was basically the only asian in the are period until like high school
. This is because you first have to split them into two categories.
Number one are mixed race from a marriage where the parent was an immigrant
Number two are mixed race from a 1st generation born with an american (eg; this retard here).
No1 usually never works out because of the cultural differences between the two parents and they end up causing this split personality in the "unconscious mind" (term from Freud).
No2 is slightly more successful but still somewhat challenging. The first gen parent idolizes in most cases, but misrepresents likely misrepresents (but at a lower rate then case no 1) the cultural norms of the host country, this leads to them coming in contact with ideological extremes as their partner (eg; in this case, you've got extra woke asian with a woke asian partner)
If we then assume that race and IQ are directly correlated, and that Eyferth's study holds true, then the mixed race children would have higher IQs in this case due to the higher IQ of the asian population in general compared to negros. This (theoretically) leads to higher degrees of mental illness but also higher intelligence, combine that with the issues in the 2 types of parents shown above. Hybrid vigor and hybrid depression both scientifically proven concepts in plants, the question is which one applies to humans?
I think the supposed fetishization of asian women by white men also play a role, but I am not too sure as that since there's no fucking women on the internet and I don't know if thats an actual thing.
>nowhere near as bad as niggers and arabs and it will be an issue way easier to solve.
You are very wrong. You have to differentiate between education as well for asians.
>negros don't assimilate very well because they don't value being productive to society
>arabs don't assimilate well because they reject the concept of society in the western sense entirely
>wetbacks don't assimilate because there's too many of them (at least down south)
>uneducated asians don't assimilate because they believe the government owes them
>education asians assimilate better than all the above due to certain common ideas shared with europeans (mainly hard work and intellectualism), but will struggle still due to preference of a collective social society over an individual one (this issue is gone by their children usually)