What you advocate cannot be done at all under the current system, period, certainly not without violence, so logically if violence will come no matter what we do, we take the violence to them first, overwhelmingly so, and with absolutely no mercy, for none would be given to us. So, as I said earlier, if you cannot commit to this without reservation take your weakness and go elsewhere, perhaps join your local Libertarian party, that would more accurately reflect the weak nature of your heart.
Not the same anon you were responding to in the below but here is how you are wrong:
>I think it would take a few generations to thoroughly and safely conduct background checks on everyone joining a movement if it would have any chance of being successful.
No, at most it would require a few days, to take a simple trip to where they say they are from to ferret out any feds with cover ID's, secondly to stop any conspiracy charges or anyone imprisoning leaders, only give out orders in dead drop form(never the same location twice, these must placed before you even give the person to carry it out the location through some anonymized means, almost every problem with feds solved right there.
>Yes. But we can peacefully combat those issues by simply not accepting their degeneracy when they offer it to us. Turn off the TV, stop buying useless products, pay as little taxes as possible, exhaust the system. The less power and money we give them, the less power they have to replace us and our culture.
No, because they will seek you out and force you to acquiesce, this has happened many many times, do i even need to mention how many? and how many times the people who did so failed to meaningfully resist once it came to them, in any way? I should hope not.
>First of all I think Tarrant was a psyop. I still agree with Varg that there's going to be a collapse of civilization sometime in the near future. Therefore, instead of trying to face the enemy with violence and risk everything, we should become self-sufficient in the countrysides and wait for civilization to fall. Most urbanites have no chance of surviving without a functioning civilization.
Nobody cares what you think about tarrant being a psyop, even if he was, it doesn't matter, he doesn't sound like a fed in his manifesto nor is his reasoning flawed anywhere within it. Varg is right on the collapse, but even he does not know when it will occur, it could be this decade, or it could be next century, or the one after that, so just hiding in the sheltered meadow will only leave us vulnerable to the hordes already in our nations, and more sent our way by the jew, and by the fact that they currently know where we are, and will always seek us out, without fail. The only solution now, largely thanks to the jew and our ancestors weakness, is to kill them all, and kill any who attempt to transgress our lands forevermore, until only we remain as sapient on this planet, with only the Japanese being a possible exception.
>Well Varg's family is just one example, but imagine the power if thousands of other traditional Europeans started having 5+ kids. We don't need any more Tarrants, we need more huge traditional European families.
We do need more large families but to have a family as such you need a safe environment, and the entire planet is currently unsafe for such things. Varg thinks his place will stay safe but when they come for him, and they will, he won't resist, he will just flee farther and farther out as those places that could be called safe shrink to become ever smaller.