Archive of old meta thread below. Nothing changed in the rules or OP. Really the only reason I made this new one is because I wanted the old picture back. I deleted it by mistake a month or two ago. https://archive.fo/0q7qd

Hello /fascist/, I arrive at your humble board to officially announce the GCUP! The GCUP will be an exhibition tournament between boards of the webring that represent nations of the world, and will be contested under usual ICUP rules. In addition, we'll also be hosting friendlies for non-national boards/teams as part of the festivites. Friendlies can be played under normal rules, or, if you choose, under alternate (meme) rulesets that will be decided closer to the Cup's kickoff. If you would like to participate, head on over to the pinned thread at our board on Cafe. The event is set to begin February 13th, 2021. Look forward to having you there!

>>15549 We gotta a streak to defend now

>>15553 It's just an exhibition Cup, not the full Infinity Cup. Though that doesn't stop you from playing a friendly or two with a shiny new championship star on your uniforms.

any chance the file limit can be bumped up to 30mb? 20mb is so small it's hard to compress videos below that size..

>>15823 The global limit is 20mb, so there's unfortunately nothing I can do it about myself. I'd definitely bump it up a bit if I could though, I know the frustration you're having with uploading videos here sometimes. If you wanna try to ask on >>>/meta/ that's really your only chance.

new reformationist

>>15827 reposted because I'm drunk and tired and I forgot a fucking > on the link and I am literally room temperature IQ Hello /fascist/ board. I'm a jannie over at /k/ and I had to reach out to site administration regarding a few post that were reported because of a uncertainty with Romanian civil code. I felt that it would be courteous to notify you since there's some crossover in the content mainly fedposting by the site administrator at >>>/meta/13836 and >>>/meta/13837. I have copied the text below for your convince: We have received a question about incitements to crime and/or genocide and how they interact with Romanian law per Anon.cafe's global rules. Please keep in mind that only the Romanian judiciary can decide precisely where, how, and to what a given law applies. We're doing our best to balance good-faith interpretations of the law with not stifling speech here. The version of the Criminal Code we refer to has been posted as a PDF at >>>/meta/13751. Genocide Genocide is outlawed by Article 438 of the Criminal Code, within Chapter 1 (Crimes of genocide and crimes against humanity) of Title XII (Crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes). The full Article states: >Art. 438 >Genocide >(1) The act of committing, with the goal of destroying, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, one of the following offenses: >a) killing members of the group; >b) harming the bodily or mental integrity of members of the group; >c) subjecting the group to living conditions of a nature that will lead to their physical destruction in whole or in part; >d) enacting steps to prevent births within the group; >e) forced transfer of children belonging to one group to a different group, shall be punishable by life imprisonment or no less than 15 and no more than 25 years of imprisonment and a ban on the exercise of certain rights. >(2) If the acts described in par. (1) are committed in wartime, shall be punishable by life imprisonment. >(3) Conspiracy to commit the crime of genocide shall be punishable by no less than 5 and no more than 10 years of imprisonment and a ban on the exercise of certain rights. >(4) Incitement to commit the crime of genocide, committed directly, in public, shall be punishable by no less than 2 and no more than 7 years of imprisonment and a ban on the exercise of certain rights. Instigation Instigation is defined in Article 47: >ART. 47 >Instigator >An instigator is a person who, with direct intent, determines another to commit an act stipulated by criminal law. The word "determines" here is somewhat confusing; we assume it to be a translation glitch. The dictionary definition of "determine" is: >determine: to control or influence something directly, or to decide what will happen For example, someone who orders financial fraud to happen but does not do it themselves is the instigator of that fraud. Public instigation of offenses is outlawed by Article 368 of the Criminal Code, within Chapter 1 (Offenses against public order and peace) of Title VIII (Offenses that harm social relationships). The article states: >ART. 368 >Public instigation >(1) The act of urging the public, verbally, in writing or by any means, to commit offenses shall be punishable by no less than 3 months and no more than 3 years of imprisonment or by a fine, without exceeding however the penalty provided by law for the offenses to which the perpetrators instigated.

>>16442 There is nothing about how specific nor clear an act of public instigation might have to be to qualify under this law. We imagine that saying something like "everybody must firebomb the house at 123 Fake St" might qualify as instigation. Taken together, we might therefore conclude that directly urging the public to kill members of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, harm the bodily or mental integrity of members of the group, subject the group to living conditions of a nature that will lead to their physical destruction in whole or in part, enact steps to prevent births within the group, or force transfer of children belonging to one group to a different group, may be considered an instigation of genocide. Two examples were provided to us. First example, where a post read: >"How much chlorine gas would one need to to theoretically gas a Walmart or similar in size building? Just for killing pests of course." This is a question and does not appear to be urging anyone to do anything, even if it is a terribly unwise thing to ask on a board where weapons are discussed. This falls into the kind of post that /k/'s posters usually label as originating from law enforcement agent-provocateurs. Second example, a general one that referred to no particular post: >"gas the jews now" Such statements are borderline. Such statements are usually hyperbole rather than serious urging. One must take context into account to determine whether any given post "[urges] the public" to take the action. Hatred Incitement to hatred or discrimination is outlawed by Article 369 of the Criminal Code, within Chapter 1 (Offenses against public order and peace) of Title VIII (Offenses that harm social relationships). The article states: >ART. 369 >Incitement to hatred or discrimination >Inciting the public, using any means, to hatred or discrimination against a category of individuals shall be punishable by no less than 6 months and no more than 3 years of imprisonment or by a fine. The problem for us here is the word "incitement", which appears in the Criminal Code only twice: Once in Article 369 (hatred), and once in Article 438 (genocide). "Incitement" here is different from "instigation". We therefore fall back on general use. The dictionary definition of "incite" is: >incite: to encourage someone to do or feel something unpleasant or violent, or to cause violent or unpleasant actions This is as far as our reasoning has taken us so far. We welcome further input and discussion.Two examples were provided to us. First example, where a post read: >"How much chlorine gas would one need to to theoretically gas a Walmart or similar in size building? Just for killing pests of course." This is a question and does not appear to be urging anyone to do anything, even if it is a terribly unwise thing to ask on a board where weapons are discussed. This falls into the kind of post that /k/'s posters usually label as originating from law enforcement agent-provocateurs. Second example, a general one that referred to no particular post: >"gas the jews now" Such statements are borderline. Such statements are usually hyperbole rather than serious urging. One must take context into account to determine whether any given post "[urges] the public" to take the action. >>13836 (continued) Hatred Incitement to hatred or discrimination is outlawed by Article 369 of the Criminal Code, within Chapter 1 (Offenses against public order and peace) of Title VIII (Offenses that harm social relationships). The article states: >ART. 369 >Incitement to hatred or discrimination >Inciting the public, using any means, to hatred or discrimination against a category of individuals shall be punishable by no less than 6 months and no more than 3 years of imprisonment or by a fine. The problem for us here is the word "incitement", which appears in the Criminal Code only twice: Once in Article 369 (hatred), and once in Article 438 (genocide). "Incitement" here is different from "instigation". We therefore fall back on general use. The dictionary definition of "incite" is: >incite: to encourage someone to do or feel something unpleasant or violent, or to cause violent or unpleasant actions This is as far as our reasoning has taken us so far. We welcome further input and discussion.

>>16443 >"How much chlorine gas would one need to to theoretically gas a Walmart or similar in size building? Just for killing pests of course." Saw that too and other borderline stuff. If I were you I would simply consider it fedposting and delete it even if it's only borderline to breaking law. Idiots need to learn how to ask questions without incriminating themselves and worse without others becoming complicit in whatever they pull off. >In World War I the German army used artillery shells filled with chlorine gas. How much of an area would a single 15 cm warhead filled with 2 liters Phosgen have covered? This is actually something that can be discussed. Retards who aren't able to figure out what they need from a possible answer should gas themselves anyway.

>>16442 >>16443 Interesting, thank you for posting this here, /k/ jannie. It is definitely something of interest to me. >>16447 > If I were you I would simply consider it fedposting and delete it even if it's only borderline to breaking law. I had seen that post too over on /k/ and thought it glowed too. Definitely something I would have deleted if I had seen it here most likely.

>>17262 I'll just delete >>3518. It has like 106 posts by one person who's posting all of the DPRK shit. It's clear that no one else gives a shit about that thread, and it's not really /fascist/ stuff, it's all about monarchs / commies

>>17263 I don't mind since I already screencapped most of it anyways

Why the fuck was the cafe down couple of hours back? Will we ever get an explanation? Provider issue? DoS? Maintenance? Now?!

>>17974 I thought it was a weird timing as well. I see nothing in /meta/ either so I'm completely in the dark.

>>18002 >>>/meta/13856 >Our downtime earlier today was the usual hypervisor problem. Our provider has indicated that they don't consider the problem to be on their end, so we'll be restarting when we see a hang. Because the machine has to be hard-reset at the hypervisor level, there's little we can do to automate this. Apologies to all affected.

>>18031 Interesting. Thanks

>>18034 Yeah I just caught it earlier as well since I try to pay attention to the boards The part that boggles me is that pokewoah went down at the same time too....

>>18031 >hypervisor whatever that is it seems to happen at a very (((convenient))) point of time thanks for the info anyways

Where did we gain so many IPs from all of a sudden? Did someone post a link to this place on another imageboard?

>>18238 The internet corporations are doing a massive censorship sweep, shutting down communities and banning dissidents. Some of them could be landing here after looking for a place that isn't shut down.

>>18238 It’s a coming-together of several issues. First and foremost, one anon told me that there are not many good places to discuss politics on the webring that are fast. Every time someone bumps a thread here, /fascist/ is propelled to the top of the webring list. People must look at this list, want to discuss the issues unfolding right now around censorship and Trump, and so come to /fascist/ (esp. the news thread). Another reason was already said by >>18245 and I completely agree. They’re shutting it down really hard right now even worse than Charlottesville. We might be picking up some people from that. And thirdly, an anon pointed out in the news thread that our namedrops on cuck/pol/ have started to become more and more frequent. While before it was once every few months we were mentioned, it is slowly becoming every few days. Luckily so far it hasn’t been as bad as it could have been. I’ve only had to ban two people. I hope it doesn’t keep growing though and not let down. I don’t want the usual active users to get flooded by newfags, and I don’t want to be overwhelmed in managing either. I might have to look for a vol from among frequent posters if it keeps up.

>>18272 >I don’t want the usual active users to get flooded by newfags Yeah, I was worried that the days of highly informative threads like the ones on religion or Japan would be over and replaced by more typical news-centered threads. Maybe you could create a second board on here specifically for news and current events and keep this one for ideological discussion? Just an idea. >I don’t want to be overwhelmed in managing either I used to run a board on 8chan that got quite active so I know how it feels. I eventually gave the ownership to someone else because I didn't want to feel like my hobby had turned into a job.

I'll just leave this here so old and newfags find it because OpSec will become a necessity soon for any White man.

>>18275 >I was worried that the days of highly informative threads like the ones on religion or Japan would be over and replaced by more typical news-centered threads That would definitely be something that I don't really want to happen. I don't care if the news thread is fairly active, but I don't want to be just another /pol/ with a different name. On the positive side though, things seem not to have changed very much in the comfy threads, such as the religion one or the Japan one. Still, it might not stay that way if we are not careful. I hadn't considered the idea of maybe setting up a second board, but I could definitely look into maybe if this becomes any sort of recurring problem, as it very well might given what Big Tech and ZOG are doing as we speak. I don't know if the admins would approve it though, given the fact that /k/ already covers a good amount of /pol/ topics. Still, definitely an idea to keep around. >I used to run a board on 8chan that got quite active so I know how it feels. I eventually gave the ownership to someone else because I didn't want to feel like my hobby had turned into a job. I can imagine how tough that felt. Interestingly, in my time of running /fascist/ for over two years on and off now, I have never been truly overwhelmed even though we're a fairly active board. I really don't get that many reports, or really have to do much except delete the occasional CP link, advertisement, or shill or disrupter. I am sure that it can turn into a hassle very quickly. My biggest "problem" is keeping up with all of the posts! I refresh this place a lot throughout the day and reply to the new posts, but now I'm constantly replying and churning out posts - my fingers are getting a workout

Anon.cafe fallback file has been added to the OP of this thread. Make sure to save it locally, and to save all of our bunker locations locally in case something happens to the site, or to /fascist/ https://anon.cafe/special_static/anoncafe_fallback.txt

Could we have different colors for subject and name field? It's kinda annoying with both being blue to read them together. Also could we get the old parentheses from julays with the shekels effect back. That was fun and nothing says fuck you kike more clear than that lol.

>>18762 Are you talking about how these are the same color? Sure, I can try to tweak that here in a little bit. I hardly know what I'm doing when it comes to the CSS, so I'll do what I can. I assume this would be pretty straightforward though. And I'd love to have something fun with the parentheses, but that was a site-wide thing in Julay. I'm not sure how that would be done.

>>18762 >Are you talking about how these are the same color? yes exactly >Sure, I can try to tweak that here in a little bit. I hardly know what I'm doing when it comes to the CSS, so I'll do what I can. I assume this would be pretty straightforward though. That would be cool and it should be easy. Settings are here https://anon.cafe/fascist/custom.css search for this color: #4dbaff It occurs five times but if you change only the subject color you have to do it just once I think. should be this here: } .labelSubject{ color:#4dbaff; } You can get the color in html code from any image editor. >parentheses, but that was a site-wide thing in Julay. too bad

>>18772 Thank you, anon, that will make things far more easy for me. I'll get to work on it now.

Glad I could help, maybe try this yellowish color #dfff4d

Test

>>18784 Testing again. Edit: Yellow looks pretty good

Test. It would be neat if I could make ##Board Owner## read 卍 Board Owner 卍. I’m not sure if that’s something I could change though

I like it, much better now. Thanks a lot! Yellow fits well with red and blue.

>>18789 No problem. Those being the same color definitely made some things a little hard to read at times.

>>18787 I know only a little about html and css so I might be wrong but I think that's hardcoded. Perhaps an auto replacing wordfilter like that nein annoys us regularly with could work but then it would do so for everyone.

>>18787 [code] .labelRole::before { content: "卍 "; } .labelRole::after { content: " 卍"; } [/code]

Awesome, it worked! Big thanks, anon

>>18859 On my end they push "Board Owner" lower than the rest of the line. If this is experienced by others and it bothers them you could change the before and after font-size to 9pt.

>>18867 Funny, on my end only the swastikas are lower. I will have to play with it tomorrow a bit.

>>18867 I can't even see it, lol.

a few screenshots on tactics (((shills))) use

I wonder if it would be a good idea to look into getting /fascist/ bunker on Zzzchan. But afaik Zzzchan has more limited server specs when compared to anon.cafe, though. Also, 8moe's Tor address is missing.

>>19186 Someone else suggested Zzzchan to me a bit ago when Neinchan was down. I've only used it a bit, but it seems solid, in fact, probably preferable as a bunker location compared to the tertiary bunker we have on 8moe. 8moe, needless to say and for good reasons, isn't ideal as a bunker. I will have to look into how one enters a request here tonight or tomorrow.

>>19192 >>19092 I’m a newfag that got most of my redpilling from 4chan, and although I highly compliment the dedication of most anons here to keep this place tidy – I fear the wellness and quality of this board in the upcoming years may go entirely to shit. Just look at the absolute state of 4chan; a hot heap of dumpster fire full of kikes and shills. And as stated in pictures >>19092, it might be just a matter of time before this place gets flooded as well. I’d like to ask if there’s somewhere else that can be used as an alternative to anoncafe? I know we have a bunker in 8chan, but it isn’t really an ideal bunker. Cheers anons.

>>19913 We of course have the 8chan bunker, but consider that a sort of tertiary bunker. Usually when this place goes down, all of the activity takes place over on Neinchan's /fascist/ and not 8chan.moe. So if you don't have Tor, definitely get it and keep this somehow: http://vvadkyuldkwon6za.onion/fascist/