>Germany was interested in using whatever could help them win the war agaisnt international Jewry this has nothing to do with futurism and advancing tech just because.
They didn't wait for the war to push the technologies. I also very much doubt they'd have abandoned it after the war if they had won. Please educate yourself.
>Lol you sound naive, give me an example of these laws that will easily solve these problems. Not even the supposed greenest countries in the world who are high tech are green.
Considering how anything more advanced than a wood cabin already becomes ungreen and polluting, I honestly wouldn't even know where to start from with you.
>No I know it's technology, you think it's Jews because you want a foolish excuse to use technology probably
I don't need foolish excuses, but it certainly takes a big fool like you to be so blind as not to see how any technology today is perverted by greed and Jews to dominate this world.
You accused me of being a Jew but you are the one who keeps denying any Jewish plan or influence, pushing instead of a complete regression and caveman-tier ecology while Israel will be sending the latest batch of Boston Dynamics killer bots to exterminate you.
>because you're a coward and afraid of acknowledging possibilities and bring forth a world that doesn't require tech and destruction of environments.
Any form of human activity is about transformation of the environment, hence destruction, manipulation and creation.
Nobody said we validated the wholesale destruction of entire environments. I think you're reading too much into the globalists' tales of massive pollution caused by our
industries that's at the core of the Great Reset. Again, that's very sketchy coming from you.
1. Denying Jewish manipulation.
2. Recyling globalists claims.
This just comes on top of your absurd claim of our entire countries being destroyed. I never thought something like a green snowflake would ever exist. Literally Green Fragility
>Blaming the Jews is moronic
You've done a poor job proving this though.
>because even before the tech revolution we can here examples of the Greeks that technology was destroying nature
Not all Greeks did that and then again your point is borderline misanthropic. What next? White people make too many babies? We should breathe less?
If we follow you and your quite asanine generalizations, we should go back to a way of life even anterior to classic Greece. If I were you I'd cut straight to the case and pray for a new flood. Maybe with some chance you'll land on some island and eat coconut milk for the remainder of your days.
>But those myths and legends and chronologies also warn us to preserve what has provided us life as well.
Again, get out of your basement and you'll notice that this planet is for the most part in a very good shape, especially in our areas. Our industries are relatively clean especially in comparison to the other ones in Africa or Asia, yet we could do much better if we could subdue the industrialists to respect proper rules. They are barely constrained by any such rules today.
>Some secret tech doesn't mean anything, because the myths don't talk about how Aryans should pollute our air to built weapons of war.
Most of the atmospheric pollution was a derivative of carbon-something. In other words, largely harmless for nature.
Perhaps people would not be depending so much on transportation if the economy wasn't so biased into forcing people to cover large distance to collect their miserable wages. I'm all in favour of ancient crafts too.
>Overpopulation was caused by the Romans using new farming methods and tools within certain areas in mainland Italy and most food of the production also coming from the Egyptian Nile and Sicily.
That's how you explain overpopulation, denying the very immigration that even some Roman patricians at some point were lamenting about?
The cultivation techniques were certainly not forgotten after Rome. The big difference between Rome and so many medieval cities and towns was in the levels of immigration. Someone here, perhaps you, pointed out how dirty Rome was. What does logic says? Filth leads to bad health and death. You cannot have both overpopulation and terrible lifespans, unless you're a nigger, a pajeet, a latino, a camel fucker or a chink. For some reason these people seem to lust even more when surrounded by shit.
Now look at Europe for example. Remove all the skitskins and ricerolls and there's plenty of land!
> This allowed the Romans to import millions of grain within their cities across the Empire and thus this lead to overpopulation.
Oh I guess they were all fat like burgers now.
One does not need to import so much food if your population has a typical White growth: slow. You need to look into why there were so many new mouths to feed.
>Mm This isn't caused by slavery it's caused by overpopulation from their high-birth rates as well.
>read: non-Whites slaves didn't have high-birth rates
Reality? Whites do not have such natural high reproduction rates.
Look, in fact, Ch