/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 5120

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB


(used to delete files and postings)

Open file (161.99 KB 266x399 ClipboardImage.png)
Fascist and Third Position Books Anonymous Board owner 04/06/2020 (Mon) 15:06:20 No.4
Post good works that you've read and ask for recommendations ITT. UPDATED 8/19/20 BASIC READING LIST National Socialism: >Mein Kampf (Adolf Hitler) The most reliable translations are the Stalag edition and the Thomas Dalton translation. >Hitler's Second Book / Zweites Buch (Adolf Hitler) >The Program of the NSDAP (Gottfried Feder) >The Manifesto for the Breaking of Interest Slavery (Gottfried Feder) >Hitler's Table Talk Black Front / Strasserism: >German Tomorrow by Dr. Otto Strasser >Deutschlands Erneuerung by Dr. Otto Strasser (in German only) Savitri Devi >The Lightning and the Sun (Savitri Devi) >And Time Rolls On (Savitri Devi) >The Impeachment of Man (Savitri Devi) http://www.savitridevi.org/home.html Iron Guard / Romanian Fascism: >For my Legionaries by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu British Union of Fascists (BUF): >Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered (Oswald Mosley) >Tomorrow We Live (Oswald Mosley) >My Life (Oswald Mosley) >Fascism v. Jewry (William Joyce) >National Socialism Now (William Joyce) >The Coming Corporate State (A. Raven Thompson) >Spring Comes Again (Jorian Jenks) Italian Fascism: >Origins and Doctrine of Fascism (Giovanni Gentile) >CasaPound Italia platform: http://www.casapounditalia.org/p/who-we-are.html Miscellaneous Secondary Literature Worth Reading: By "worth reading" I mean not totally kiked garbage. These are not fascist authors. >The Wages of Destruction (Adam Tooze) >Holy Legionary Youth (Roland Clark) >The Nazi War on Cancer (Robert Proctor) >The Occult Roots of Nazism (Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke) >Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the Politics of Identity (Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke) >Japan's Holy War (Walter Skya) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cultured Thug is also a good YouTube channel for overviews of fascist literature: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/cultured_thug/ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFVf_ACP5I8VF5VsmSDQ8tQ Helpful Links: https://sci-hub.tw/ http://gen.lib.rus.ec/ https://archive.org/ https://www.bitchute.com/cultured_thug/
Edited last time by FashBO on 08/20/2020 (Thu) 01:46:27.
>>6021 I can't trust table talks at all because it vague as hell, but Hitler surrounding himself with anti-christians and taking inspirations from them as well doesn't mean he's anti-christian at all. I'm a pagan myself and even I read books and have agreements with Christians on things when it comes to politics and monarchism in ways, but does that make me a Christian? I recommend you read books from historians like Deschner, God and the Fascists: or Stingl, Gott segne den Führer they specifically talk about how Hitler and how the catholic church worked together and how catholics in Germany helped him get into power. At best I believe that HItler only wanted freedom of religion for anyone who was pro-German or European at least, because the last thing the NS needs is a bunch of zealots ruining everything because they can't get along to fight against a greater threat known as international jewry.
>>6027 It doesn't matter what Hitler did or didn't do on the Abrahamic Question, he was not infallible. The fact is that, if it weren't for Christians, jews would most likely not be in existence now, and if they were, they would be nowhere near, as entrenched, and powerful as they are. Christianity destroyed our natural kinship, and love for our race, and has encouraged egalitarianism and miscegenation from it's very beginning. That Aryans twisted it to not encourage those things, and kept scriptures away from the lemmings, so as to control them and limit the effects of the doctrine, is not in doubt, and Christians use this fact to say we can return to our Christian "roots". The far more logical and correct thing to do, is to let go of the mind-virus, and destroy every fucking thing there is that can revive it, so that it will never poison or weaken us again. Then we need to let something else, something far better, and not sourced to jews, take it's place. Whether that is Volkisch Wotanism, or Cosmotheism, or the Vedic Aryan religion, or any of our other still existing pre-Christian teachings and religions, doesn't matter. What does matter, is that we repudiate and invert, in every way we can, the values that Christianity has instilled, that were not copied wholesale from our prior beliefs. If you claim to be National Socialist, you must be anti-christian and you must seek to destroy it in all it's forms, I hope myself that this can be done peacefully but I am beginning to suspect that it is no longer possible to do so.
>>6027 >the last thing the NS needs is a bunch of zealots ruining everything because they can't get along to fight against a greater threat known as international jewry. Christianity is ultimately contingent on the greater JQ and the related phenomenon of Abrahamism. It’s something that needs to be addressed. That doesn’t necessarily mean we run around yelling “KIKE ON A STICK” and actively being as off-putting as possible, but the Abrahamic nature of Christianity can’t be overlooked. It’s possible that the core of Christianity could be de-Abrahamized. The guy between DharmaNation, Śri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya seems to believe that the original teachings of Jesus were anti-Abrahamic to their core, but were subverted by Jewish fanatics like (((Saul of Tarsus))). If (emphasis on ‘if’) this is possible, it should be promoted to a limited extent, but honestly even if we admit that, the core teachings of Christianity amount to a life-denying, otherworldly form of slave morality. A path preached by a “Man Above Time”. Even IF it wasn’t Jewish fundamentally, this is a major mark against it. This poster >>6032 is basically right. Something else will need to take its place if we are to flourish and survive. It’s interesting to note that just today I was reading an excerpt from Schopenhauer (who died in 1860) saying that Christianity was dying. Nietzsche said the same thing later on. Looking at church attendance rates and the behavior of self-professed Christians, it IS dying. It’s a corpse of a religion and it’s not just dying, it’s dragging our race down with it. We can’t just leave a void though, people need some larger purpose. I wouldn’t push anyone from their comfort, but if it leads to racial suicide they deserve a rude awakening and at least pointed towards, at absolute minimum, a healthier form of this slave moralizing cult
>>6045 I've read enough to think it unlikely Jesus existed and if he did he was so unremarkable that the Romans didn't bother recording his execution. In the first case, Saul invented the whole religion meaning none of it is anti-Abrahamic in any way, save for that which he plagiarized from Rome, and this is the most likely eventuality.in the second case The entire religion is based on the Torah and was Jewish from the outset regardless of Jesus's disagreements with the Talmud and the "Pharisee" cult, then Saul came along later and improved and perfected his subversive doctrine to point it against the goyim/pagans. Either way there is no possibility in this world in which Christianity is not Jewish, and it isn't worth keeping around in any form.
>>6057 I tend to think that Jesus existed, but I wouldn't be able to offer many theories on how he actually was as a person. It's possible that he was half-Aryan given the theories from several sources on him having a Roman father, but it's sadly impossible to know what he did say and what he didn't say. I view him as no more than a wise man or sage like Apollonius of Tyana. His teachings might be good for certain ascetics, but certainly not as a foundation for an entire society. Most of his teachings would be very harmful for our people if they were to become normalized (and many of them have). His teachings are antithetical to the Natural Order, which is founded on the affirmation of this world, strength and power. Regardless, he sure made the Jews absolutely buttmad for a while there if the gospels are to be believed, but it's very possible that Nietzsche was correct and even this is feigned so as to make the goyim take the bait. Cosmotheism is our best bet.
Christianity is Levantine and Abrahamic in character. it has its positive qualities, and it's deeply entrenched in the West, but ultimately it's foreign to us. if we're to have a Volkish religion, it will have to be a different tradition. with that said, I think Christianity is here to stay, so even in the best case scenario, it will have to be contained and negotiated with rather than outright extirpated. in many ways, Christianity was a backlash against the degeneration of the Hebrew religion, which was already well underway by the 1st century AD. the original Hebrews, while Abrahamic, had many based qualities, which is why everyone from White nationalists to black nat'lists have tried to claim that heritage. but their descendants the Pharisees were of a dramatically different, inferior character. since the Hebrews were always concerned with the primacy of Law, its degenerate form became litigious and hypocritical, concerned with the letter of the law and not its spirit; an attitude which is all too familiar today. Christianity was a reassertion of the spirit of the Law. while that was a great achievement, it's still characterized by egalitarianism, slave morality, and life denial, as others have said. modern Judaism is a direct descendant of the Pharisees and the Talmud, NOT the Old Testament, which explains alot. Christianity evolved from Hebrew roots, so it represents a definite break from Pharisaic ways, but it still carries the baggage of Abrahamism.
>>6159 >the original Hebrews, while Abrahamic, had many based qualities, which is why everyone from White nationalists to black nat'lists have tried to claim that heritage It's hard not to appreciate some aspects of the Old Testament. This is controversial to say, I know, but it is a fine framework for racial preservation and supremacy. The Old Testament is life-affirmative, realistic and optimistic. Yahweh is even had to say of the world in Genesis "Behold, it was very good" (Genesis 1:31). But in the New Testament, the Devil himself is called the "Prince of this world" (John 12:31), quite a far cry from the "very good" character of Yahweh's creation in Genesis, unless we are to identify the two in some sort of Marcion-esque interpretation. There is a general softening as well, lex talionis becomes the command to love one's enemy, eternal life is promised, reconciliation and love is praised, etc. The fundamental character of Judaism is conducive to racial survival and an affirmation of this world. This is why so many have rightfully identified it as more of a vehicle for Jewish survival than a religion as such.
Bronze Age Mindset by Bronze Age Pervert
Hey, BO, Someone in the /sig/ thread is talking about HRT and becoming a woman. I also believe it is the same person who is posting with the Synarchist flag. I you are asking me, they are trying to make Synarchist anon look bad by posting as him. More importantly, Snyarchist anon has posted in that thread previously and I have never seen him use TOR. I find this extremely (((coincidental))) that at the same time this has happened another anon is proposing to ban all non White posters. I am at a point to where I believe that integralist RPer, Ethnoglobe winer, and now these people are a part of a group or the same individual. Their intentions are to divide all /fascist/ and insure they cannot work together. The reason why I am posting here is because I could not report it for some reason. I don't know why, it kept telling me I was getting the captcha wrong. Image related.
>>6680 I apologize for posting with numerous grammar errors. I was panicking when I was post. I need to calm down.
>>6680 Thanks for letting me know. Strange that you were unable to report, but captchas are gay sometimes. There’s definitely some fuckery going on. I said it in the first unpopular opinions too, but notice how out of the blue all of this sodomy shilling came out of nowhere in multiple threads, along with the tranny-posting. I have no doubt in my mind that there is someone / a few people who are out to fuck with the board and make us look as bad as possible. I might have some peculiar moderation choices and behaviors, and I might not be the most competent at times, but I’ve been getting progressively more suspicious. I might look for a vol soon, but I have to be extremely careful to who I give it to given the fact that there is this problem and I want someone who shares the same general outlook I have moderation-wise.
>>6682 Of course, I'm glad to provide assistance. I'm thankful you don't agree with banning all non-White posters. It's obvious it's a D&C tactic to cause infighting among fascist. On the subject of that, I actually meant to post this in meta thread but like I said, I was panicking. I assumed we were being DDoS'd because i was unable to report. Another thing, do you think these shills fear an alliance between White and non-White fascists?
>>6685 >Another thing, do you think these shills fear an alliance between White and non-White fascists? I think it comes from two sources. First, we obviously have the shills who just want to find points of contention within a board and apply pressure to these apparent weak-spots. Classic D&C. The second source of this, I think, comes from (newer) posters who seem to fail to understand why exactly I made this board. As it says in the meta thread — “/fascist/ is a board for discussion of fascism in its various manifestations and, in a more general sense, third-position ideology”. We’re not /pol/, so I have different standards in who I want posting here. I *do* enjoy talking to WNs more than other posters since I relate to them more, and since I am a National Socialist, but fascism in a broad sense and related things has always been the main topic of this board and will continue to be so irregardless of complaints. It would be completely different if I were running an organization in real life. One inspiration for making this board was Cultured Thug’s channel. I enjoy how he covers books and ideas from diverse origins, and many obscure fascist and third position ideologies. That’s sort of what this board is supposed to be. I think most people understand that mostly
Does anyone have a readable version of Mishima's commentary on the hakagure? This is one of my favorites by him but the libgen version is practically unreadable on my kobo.
I'm not one of the shills, just an overboardfag. I have been putting effortposts into unpopular thread debates if I see something I think is irrational or mistaken, but otherwise not a poster here. It's clear there's a problem user or two. BO has spotted some, you;ve noticed some false flagging. There's also some trollposts on other boards now (see: /meta/) so someone is clearly trying to start shit, and either they're faking reactions here or they're getting reactions. I suspect the majority of politics posters on IBs are post-2015fags who don't know how to handle drama and trolling well, which doesn't help. My abridged, subjective summary of the situation is here. Of course, it's a single perspective, but it may help those who only use this board and suddenly see drama and go overboard on defense (a natural reaction, same thing happened with the zchan spam saga). https://anon.cafe/meta/res/18.html#13539 >>6685 >Another thing, do you think these shills fear an alliance between White and non-White fascists? I think it's fair to say White supremacy is far too prevalent for that to be a rational fear.
>>6784 I’ve came across two versions online. One has over 500 pages and is basically unreadable on every device I’ve used, and the second is an actual scan of the book. The latter is the best version available that I’m aware of. A PDF can be found in the Japan thread >>6728
>>6796 Thanks fren. Legit considering dropping the hundo this shit costs on amazon to get a physical copy and make an actual legit digital copy for people. His thoughts are so applicable to the world we live in today. Someday, with threads like these, the world will gain the spirit back that it lost after WWII.
>>6802 No problem, fren, glad to help. It would be great if you or someone else at some point were to actually put together a good digitial copy of this book. It’s honestly a fucking shame that with Mishima’s books that aren’t novels (like his book on the Hagakure or Sun and Steel) that they are so difficult to find and almost impossible to get a physical copy without giving up an arm and a leg. I want to know why there are no reprints, perhaps it is because of what you say in the second paragraph.
Does anyone have any books on National Synarchism?
>>6810 The best I can suggest to you is a paper titled "Fascism and Sinarquismo: Popular Nationalisms Against the Mexican Revolution" by Albert L. Michaels. It's not a book of course, but with material on Synarchism being so rare in English this is one of the only things I've come across. The JSTOR link should of course be accessible through the sci-hub.tw site listed at the bottom of the OP https://www.jstor.org/stable/23913319
>>6812 Thanks anon. It was a nice read.
Is Malcom X's book worth buying in hardback? I've never read it but the White liberal quote has me curious. I think we can learn a lot from what he had to say. Rockwell and Malcom X agreed on many subjects and both were killed by their Government for their opinions. Any other books worth picking up? I prefer hardbacks when possible. I just finished Ted's latest book and I'm hungry for more of the same.
>>7196 > I just finished Ted's latest book and I'm hungry for more of the same. When you say you've read his latest book, do you mean 'Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How?' or do you mean the newest edition of 'Technological Slavery' that came out earlier this year? I originally assumed you meant the former, so if you have not read the latter, it's worth checking out for a lot of his older essays and letters that deal with a whole range of topics. It's nice to have a physical form of some of his essays like the one dealing with Anarcho-Primitivism or the System's Greatest Trick. When it comes to similar books not by Ted, there are a couple of options out there that are really good. Ellul's writings are one example. The three he's most famous for are 'The Technological Society', 'Propaganda' and 'The Political Illusion'. I've only read the first two, and they are definitely worth reading. He's sometimes a bit dense, but I found with 'The Technological Society' that once you get used to his style and power through for a bit you can get into a rhythm and read it pretty easily. I think his stuff would benefit from rereading too. 'The Technological Society' is basically ISAIF if it was 400 pages long and much broader in stroke. Ellul doesn't say that we need to abolish tech, but he offers a pretty damning critique. Oswald Spengler's 'Man and Technics' is pretty short, but also very good. This was written in the 1930s and he predicts mass extinctions, deforestation, the loss of White political and economic dominance due to the spread of technology to non-Whites and the collapse of our civilization in time. Very prophetic. Concerning your main question, I haven't read that book by Malcolm X that you mention. I did read a one point a book by Huey P. Newton, one of the founders of the Black Panthers called "Revolutionary Suicide" at one point though and thought that it was pretty interesting.
>>1319 >>3291 Can you give a compilation of all the PDFs on these charts except for Nitschze? >>5860 >Cope Anyone who uses cuckchan lingo should be instantly banned from here. >>6020 Seconding this, I would like to read or have some instructions about how to draw art on par with the Romans, Greeks, Japs, etc and beauty.
>>7221 >japanese I really like Ukiyo-e, got a bunch of them around.
>>7332 Post em my nigger
>>7336 I need to get most of them re-framed first. I bought like 15 from around the beginning of the 19th century at an auction (wasn't too expensive). Most of them are the standard "beautiful girls do x" (not that it's a bad thing), but I do have a few with birds and fishermen on them that are really nice.
>>7379 Sorry, beginning of the 20th century*
>>7379 It seems that an appreciation of "cute girls doing cute things" is ingrained in the Japanese spirit
Where are you guys buying books? Amazon purged everything good and I don't want to give them money anyway.
>>7756 I used to just do Amazon. Back a year or two ago one was able to get pretty much everything good from there. I've used Barnes & Noble to get some stuff. They're of course a big corporation themselves, but last year I was able to get a lot of books from them that Amazon had purged by that point, such as the Culture of Critique, The Track of the Jew Through the Ages, The Talmud Unmasked and the Jews and Modern Capitalism. I've also been thinking of trying to buy shit directly from Counter Currents. I already own some of their stuff like their unabridged edition of the Lightning and the Sun but I've never tried to order from them yet.
I found a Julius Evola reading flowchart but since I only have the books on Fascism (A Traditionalist Confronts Fascism, Fascism Viewed From The Right) Notes On The Third Reich, Metaphysics Of War, Ride The Tiger and Revolt Against The Modern World, where should I start with those? since I have a limited selection?
>>7756 not "everything good" mind you. I still order from them from time to time but if I want wrongthink, I usually head over to archive.org for the real nitty gritty stuff.
>>8159 I've heard a few times on /lit/ that one should not start with the big name Evola books like Revolt or Ride the Tiger. Anecdotally I think this is true. The first Evola book I tried to read was Revolt, and I was unable to finish it. I am a big reader too, I just felt bogged down and bored, so I tried to read Metaphysics of War and was able to read it fairly easily. MoW would probably be my recommendation for a starting point. He had some good insights on the two types of war - the greater war and the lesser war. The lesser war is the physical combat, the greater war is the battle against the enemy within, a drive towards ascesis and self-mastery. He links it jihad and talks a lot here and there about the Bhagavad Gita, so I found it enjoyable. Fascism Viewed From the Right was readable as well, so you could probably read that fairly soon as well. I haven't read tons of Evola so I can only go off what I know
Don't know if this is the right thread, just wanted to leave here a link where you can find an archive with speeches, essays, posters and other materials from National Socialist Germany and East Germany https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/index.htm
Open file (270.41 KB 349x507 ClipboardImage.png)
Open file (267.91 KB 423x542 ClipboardImage.png)
>>8255 That's a good site, I downloaded many of my NatSoc images from that site. Would recommend. The guy who maintains that page has a decent book on some important speeches of National Socialism too that I own.
>>8928 Too pro-christianity, discarded.
>>8982 He was more on point than off, Christianity aside.
>>8983 One is never "on point" so long as they subscribe to christian ethics or values in any form, his analysis of the Jewish Problem is utterly eclipsed by his ignorance of the Christian Problem which encompasses the Jewish Problem, without them there would be no Jewish Problem today, they would all be dead, though the Romans would have disappeared anyway.
>>8982 this boards cult-like obsession with Christ as enemy says more about the board than the man himself, in flesh.
>>8992 Virtue ethics are Aristotlean. St. Thomas Aquinas continued that tradition. come again?
>>8992 The way I see it, his Christianity doesn’t really matter. He saw almost all of the same problems that we do (JQ, White genocide, etc) and even despite his ignorance of the Christian problem, he did not refrain from doing what he thought had to be done. It was a quite un-Christian attack. There was no “loving your enemy” or “do not resist evil” in his deeds
>>9000 The ethics of Christianity, are not Aristotle's Virtue ethics, the ethics of Christianity are sourced to the Jewish men who wrote the the Gospels, mainly Mark and Paul. Virtue ethics were warped into something Christian and were a pragmatic choice that the men who ran the church decided to allow, to allow them the power and influence and status they desired, and to provide a way to make Christianity workable, which in it's original form was not and still is not. Using something completely unchristian to do so, warping it, even though the source was a Pagan man, is essentially a Pagan thing to do, which is why there is still so much false attraction to Aquinas traitor though he was. Never forget that they were later discarded almost entirely, once Martin Luther prevented the death of the church, through the renaissance and election of Cesare Borgia to the papacy. the Catholic church was almost dead and Christianity with it, but thanks to Luther ever since that day, we have had communist revolutions using Christianity and Jesus and the ethics of the bible and specifically the New Testament as their inspiration. This includess Karl Marx, whose main inspirations were the earlier and still quite recent in his time, Christian commies. and before you bring up Plato his Communistic ideas were placed on a three tiered caste system, something Marx didn't use nor dare to use, as he was a jew. We are not obsessed with christianity, we are however obsessed with saving the Aryan Race, something with which Christianity is absolutely NOT compatible, and even Hitler correctly Identified this. He had no choice but to be nice to them. We, now, in the extremely desperate time for our race that it is, have no choice but to oppose them openly and brazenly, no matter who it offends, because they are the greater problem, they are the reason Jews are so powerful, Gods damn them, they're the reason jews still exist and have so much influence specifically because "SALVATION COMES FROM THE JEWS". >>9003 I disagree, he targeted a synagogue of jews, none of whom are connected to, or implicated in the overarching power structure that serves them and cooperates with them. What he did, was flawed, in that he attacked a symptom and not the power structure, I commend his killing of jews but his reasons for doing so and utter blindness to the real problem make him seem foolish in retrospect.
Open file (378.11 KB 1660x1024 the chad robert bowers.jpg)
>>9038 >he targeted a synagogue of jews, none of whom are connected to, or implicated in the overarching power structure that serves them and cooperates with them What do you think of Bowers? He targeted Poway due to the fact that the synagogue had recently participated in some HIAS-related event. With Jews it's much more likely that you'll hit something related to at least the local power structure. Earnest was too rash and should have spent a bit more time planning and prepping. I definitely want to see bigger Jews get what's coming for once though. I like Bowers personally, but if it's not some globalist kike the Jewish machine is only scratched
>>9047 He killed jews and said little about it, how could I not respect that?

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)

no cookies?