/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 5120

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

More

(used to delete files and postings)


Open file (28.91 KB 474x298 OIP.jpeg-59.jpg)
Christian Fascist Thread Blackshirt 05/22/2020 (Fri) 19:36:33 ID: 9df816 No.181
Am I the only Christian here?
>>2322 He realized how stupid it is to pick a fight with the church, specially in very religious nations >Christianity and the Church are not a static entities Which is why leading change to go for the support of Fascism is a valid plan >>2222 My conscience says this is wrong, but those digits say otherwise
what do you guys think about some of the rules of amish culture that prevent things like jews and niggers taking over? they dont beleive in banks, and besides the fact no nigger would want to live like they do, they have a strict rule where they dont marry outside their community making them a seperate race of people almost compared to other white americans. these two things are in contrast to criticisms of christian culture in regards to race.
Open file (23.26 KB 1144x225 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2392 They're a healthier community than the surrounding degenerate America, however they only are permitted at the whim of ZOG. They're extremely cucked when it comes to their beliefs on violence. If ZOG ever decided to pop their little they wouldn't even resist. Back in 2006 some faggot murdered five little girls in an Amish schoolhouse and the Amish cucked so hard, even attending the funeral of the man who pumped their daughters full of lead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Nickel_Mines_School_shooting#Amish_community_response
>>2395 one huge positive about the Amish is their immense fertility rate paired with the tradition of having their kids go out into the 'normal' world when they turn 18 for a while and choosing whether to stay in normal society or go back to the Amish community, kind of pouring their excess Amish into the general white community and bolstering it a bit. With white liberals having essentially no children and white conservatives only reaching the replacement rate, eventually this will become a fairly significant portion of the white population, the former Amish. Though if this is really a good thing remains to be seen, it stands to reason that only the more materialistic and even hedonistic Amish decide to leave, but we can hope that at the very least they retain some sense of community and family values and bring that into society at large.
>>2392 Didn't some amish defectors say that amish people are a bit fucked up?
>>2676 Even if some have said this, there's always reason to wonder (1) why they are saying this and (2) fucked up by whose standards. Anabaptists are very collectivistic compared to our atomized society and in some ways could be seen by our standards as restrictive to individuality, choice and oppressive towards women.
My relationship with Christianity is a complicated one due to it's Hebrew origins, i do think ancient Christianity was significantly less cucked than it's modern equivalent and although i favor paganism and esotericism/the occult more i do still enjoy the christian and medieval/Gothic aesthetic, i also take a liking to the warrior culture of the Teutonic order and the knights Templar, but one thing i cannot forgive Christianity for it's involvement with the death of Rome.
>>181 Nope.
>>2740 What I did was realize that much of the Christian aesthetic that many Whites are proud of or that they admire is less a product of Christianity itself, than it is a product of White genius itself. European greatness in the periods after Rome is, how I see it, in spite of Christianity rather than because of it. Now in the era where Christianity has entered a great decline and is in fact becoming even more cucked and meek (truer to itself!) we need to learn as a people to step over it and begin anew. I admire paganism, but a reconstruction of its most outward aspects is not enough. A true renaissance is coming
>Alexamenos worships [his] God
>>3240 nice find >“The Ethiops say that their gods are flat-nosed and black, >While the Thracians say that theirs have blue eyes and red hair. >Yet if cattle or horses or lions had hands and could draw, >And could sculpt like men, then the horses would draw their gods >Like horses, and cattle like cattle; and each they would shape >Bodies of gods in the likeness, each kind, of their own.” ― Xenophanes
Open file (252.43 KB 785x1000 soyjack jew.jpg)
>>3265 Now this is a good strategic use of Xenophanes top kek
Christianbros—how the hell does the mind of your purple-pilled co-religionists even work? I have been redpilling someone in real life slowly on the Jews for a few weeks, and I was contacted by this friend today. He told me that he was now in a spiritual crisis due to what I've showed him. He said that there were two alternatives—either the Jews "have a sinister plot that needs stopped or the Jews are following gods plan and today was a sign " "today was a sign" refers to some mention of the Holohoax that he heard today. Apparently he thinks this might be a "sign from God" that the Jews are following God's plan even though I've showed this dude tons and tons of evidence of Jewish communist involvement, subversion, the truth behind WWII, Talmudic flip-flopping morality, etc. You can't make this shit up.
>>5533 >some mention of the Holohoax that he heard today How can that be a sign if that happens all the time? either he's grasping at straws to avoid the harsh reality or he's getting gangstalked.
>>5536 >How can that be a sign if that happens all the time? Beats me. He was apparently trading insults with his younger brother and his brother called him a Jew (based middle schooler it seems like), causing his father to reprimand him and mention that "we don't speak about Jews like that because of the Holocaust". This was a "sign" potentially. He's just getting hit hard by the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon. He wouldn't have thought anything of some mention of the Holocaust if I hadn't blasted his head full of redpills. A week or so ago I showed him Eric Dubay's Adolf Hitler documentary that is full of pieces of Hellstorm and TGSNT and he seemed somewhat intrigued, but yesterday I pulled up my computer and went through with him on Wikipedia through every major media boss and prominent kike I could think of along with all of the big communist names. I might have made him overdose on redpills, I don't know. This guy has talked to me about mundane things being "signs" before too as well.
>>1640 >>Aizawa saw Christianity as a religion founded upon the principle that all people are equal in the eyes of God. To him, this notion was a clever deceit and a highly effective weapon. It posed no small threat to Japan because of its irresistible appeal to the lower classes. It taught them the seductive fiction that all people universally deserve God's love, and that this love is a power greater even than the authority of a local samurai, a daimyou, a shougun or even an emperor. "It's main doctrines are simple to grasp and well-contrived; they can easily deceive stupid commoners with it" Now that's a based Jap. Wish we had more Japs like him around.
Open file (385.70 KB 626x770 the meximutt.png)
Can we ban Synarchist Spic already? He's even posting cuckime now.
>>5563 >because of its irresistible appeal to the lower classes On that regard, why is there the meme of the higher classes hating the poorer ones? Why not help them? This is ofc in the situation where it's in a homogeneous country (aka Japan).
Open file (153.23 KB 400x518 OrangutanP1.jpg)
>>5533 Some people cannot be convinced to changed their views even in the face of overwhelming evidence. If it makes you feel better, it is possible for a few people to change. I spoke to a friend recently that lives in LA. His parents are commie boomers and he sort of held some communist beliefs including pro refugee and loving Mexicans immigrants. When we actually talked, i asked him what he thought about the chimp outs and he told me he hated the niggers who were doing and unironically considered leaving the state and buying a gun to defend himself from the nigs. He also said that whenever he saw a black person he started to get nervous and almost feared for his life. It was an impressive change of opinion and I'm glad he has changed. I don't think he holds communist leanings any more, but he did say he just didn't like the government or authority. He's not a beef steak or anything but I think it's a step in the right direction. On the subject of your friend, for him to change his opinion, he'd probably have to see some truly disgusting shit jews do like genociding of the Palestinians or maybe evidence coming out that 9/11 was a Zionist plot. I know these outcomes seem unlikely but I also thought my friend changing his opinion was unlikely as well. however, reading the paragraph above proved that, while it was unlikely, it wasn't impossible Image unrelated
>>5566 >why is there the meme of the higher classes hating the poorer ones? I wouldn't say it is totally a meme. It's not hard to look at the average lemming with contempt and conclude that he is an absolute philistine with no real goals in life beyond his station. But, just as there may be contempt among some members of the upper classes, it would be foolish to deny or downplay the seething envy that exists among many members of the lower classes. The spread of Marxism was widely due to the Jews exploiting a very real situation and injecting their poison into the minds of the workers, taking some good solutions and associating them with egalitarianism, internationalism, class conflict, atheism and feminism while arousing the envy and hatred of the masses, the lowest of instincts. >Why not help them? This is what National Socialism aims to do. We understand the mutual interdependence of societies and how they are composed of both lower and higher elements. While not seeking to create parasites as has happened in America, we care for those in need. The Volksgemeinschaft is founded on these principles, just see the Winterhilfswerk program, slogans such as "public need before private greed (Gemeinnutz vor Eigennutz)" and the National Socialist People's Welfare. From all of this, a more harmonious and united society is created. Inequality and hierarchy are facts of life, but too wide of a gulf can create tensions, conflict and weakness.
>>934 I agree with everything you said, and I think thats what Hitler thought too. But werent the table talks proven to be fake? Or at least not proven to be 100% accurate?
>>5703 Personally I believe that Table Talks is real. I have a few reasons for believing this. Firstly, there is nothing within the work useful to the Jews that Hitler says. Though the dates of the monologues within the book are between 1941 and 1944, Hitler NEVER mentions anything about exterminating the Jews — something we are told that was in full swing during this time period. While this doesn’t make it true in itself, it is very telling. If TT is a hit-piece or Jewish lie agains Hitler, what exactly does it do that makes him look bad? I say nothing at all, indeed it makes him look even better and highly intelligent with how he can speak at such length on such a wide variety of topics ranging from history, philosophy, art, architecture and the ongoing war-effort. Secondly, nothing in TT conflicts with what we know of Hitler from Mein Kampf or his conduct as Führer. The biggest revelation is his criticisms of Christianity, but this is hardly surprising in many ways due to his worldview founded in the Laws of Nature, as well as the people he surrounded himself with (Bormann, Himmler, Rosenberg, etc) — in fact the anti-Christian Hitler would make far more sense given his actions than the opposite. My third reason is that David Irving endorses TT as being authentic, and claims to have seen the original pages. He seems to say that some English translations are potentially dodgy in some respects, but good enough. http://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/Hitler/TableTalk010104.html All these taken together, I have little reason to personally doubt them. Most of the people who claim TT is fake are coping Christians from what I have seen. Though don’t take my word for it, if you’re already well-acquainted with Hitler’s worldview go and read Ostara Publication’s edition of it. They are trustworthy
>>5705 That makes sense, although a christian might say it makes him look bad because he is shitting on the one true religion, (((christianity))). But thanks for your input. This doesnt really have anything to do with TT, but if Hitler was a pagan, or a gnostic like some people say, why did he ban the Thule society?
>>5711 Hitler also cracked down on several groups similar to the Thule Society. Lanz von Liebenfels' Ordo Novi Templi was banned as well in the 1940s. This group was not strictly pagan, but instead was based off of Liebenfels' interpretations of the Bible and that the original Aryans were god-like beings who had telepathic and magnetic powers granted to them by their pineal glands. One thing that Hitler does not appear to have suppressed though is Jakob Wilhelm Hauer's German Faith Movement, which appears to have been much more pagan. Personally I don't think Hitler was a pagan at all in the sense that most of understand that term today. Hitler was pantheistic if anything, his religion was the laws of nature. Life was based around the struggle for existence and the survival of the fittest. Hitler wanted to organize Germany society in harmony with these natural laws and viewed nature as a source of wisdom and rules. This may not be pagan, but many pagans even back in the early 20th century did share many elements of this type of thinking (as many do today still). Guido von List's Wotanism apparently envisioned a cyclical universe, governed by laws of nature, an expression of immanent divinity. Man was part of a greater whole, man was to live in accordance with Nature. And this wasn't some cucked hippie thought either, because von List believed in a rigidly hierarchical state that would basically enslave non-Whites and guard racial purity. Hitler might have been "pagan adjacent" at max, seeing it as something healthier than Christianity, but not necessarily the solution to our problems.
>>5724 Hitler was an extremely pragmatic and insightful person, and he seemed to rely on his superb sense of instinct for most of his stances. Looking at his life, he didn't seem to worry about supernatural beliefs much, which I think is for the better. I think this is why he banned many nationalist occult societies along with Judeo-masonic style ones; he saw them as nonsensical distractions, even if the nationalist ones were well meaning. Additionally many of the masonic societies "rebranded" themselves as nationalist when Hitler came to power so they could subvert the real nationalist groups from the inside, as Jews usually do. So he probably decided to ban all secret societies because they're, well, secret, and the government or public had no way of knowing if those societies were up to no good. After all, why would a society need to keep its existence, members, and actions secret if they're honest people. I agree with this stance completely. You might say an anonymous image board is an example of a this secrecy, but the boards are always open to the public for discussion, so we can't hide behind a mask. >>5705 One thing I find strange about Hitler's stance on Christianity is that he (obviously) held a low opinion of the Old Testament (read Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin by Dietrich Eckart for more info on that), wasn't fond of the New Testament or the apostles, but seemed to legitimately hold Jesus himself in high esteem. Not really sure what to make of that.
Open file (428.53 KB 453x591 Aryan Jesus.png)
>>5740 That Masonic theory likely has something to it. If you read about Lanz von Liebenfels' ONT in particular, it was as Masonic as fuck with all sorts of ranks, rituals and initiations. Unfortunately a lot of the groups like this at this time seemed to have an infatuation with Masons or Rosicrucians. >One thing I find strange about Hitler's stance on Christianity is that he (obviously) held a low opinion of the Old Testament (read Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin by Dietrich Eckart for more info on that), wasn't fond of the New Testament or the apostles, but seemed to legitimately hold Jesus himself in high esteem. Not really sure what to make of that. Hitler believed that Jesus was some sort of anti-Jewish fighter that was at least partially Aryan if I remember correctly. I'm not sure what to think of this theory. I think it is at least plausible. For one, since I do not believe in the virgin birth for obvious reasons, Jesus must have had a father. Who was the father? I think the theory that a Roman soldier named Panthera was his actual father is interesting. Not only do the Jews speak of this in the Toledot Yeshu and the Talmud, but 2nd century pagan philosopher Celsus makes the exact same claim. One more interesting fact that could hint at a partially non-Jewish ancestry could be the following: >The region's Israelite name is from the Hebrew root גָּלִיל (galíl), an ultimately unique word for 'district', and usually 'cylinder'. The Hebrew form used in Isaiah 8:23 (or 9:1 in different Biblical versions) is in the construct state, g'lil ha-goyím (Hebrew: גְּלִיל הַגּוֹיִם‎), meaning 'Galilee of the nations', i.e. the part of Galilee inhabited by Gentiles at the time that the book was written. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilee Galilee was inhabited by goyim at one point? Interesting. It's also worth noting that Jesus told his followers to procure weapons, and he personally did actions such as flip tables and whip greedy Jews. This of course raises the topic of how to reconcile these actions with the infamous Sermon on the Mount. I've heard a few theories for this. One is that Jesus was a Man Above Time (in Savitri Devi's sense). He was teaching the path towards individual enlightenment and was essentially a sage-like figure, thus his teachings weren't meant to be normative for the entire society. He taught the way of the Sannyasa, identified with the final life stage of Hinduism, that of the renouncer. Another is that he was teaching something too profound for the Jews to understand, usually identified with Hinduism in the theories that I read. Because of this, they nailed him to the cross. There's actually some interesting evidence to this.
>>830 John Chapter 8 verses 31 through 47. 31 To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. 32 Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” 33 They answered him, “We are Abraham’s descendants and have never been slaves of anyone. How can you say that we shall be set free?” 34 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. 35 Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. 36 So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. 37 I know that you are Abraham’s descendants. Yet you are looking for a way to kill me, because you have no room for my word. 38 I am telling you what I have seen in the Father’s presence, and you are doing what you have heard from your father.[a]” 39 “Abraham is our father,” they answered. “If you were Abraham’s children,” said Jesus, “then you would[b] do what Abraham did. 40 As it is, you are looking for a way to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things. 41 You are doing the works of your own father.” “We are not illegitimate children,” they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.” 42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me. 43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. 45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me! 46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don’t you believe me? 47 Whoever belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God.” Jesus called Jews that didn't follow him the children of Satan. Martin Luther, the father of protestantism, hated the Jews. C.S.Lewis, a famous Christian theologian, hated the Jews. Anyone who thinks Christianity is pro-Jewish has clearly never read the Bible.
>>830 >>5740 >Any religion or teaching which denies the Natural Laws of the Universe is false. And in what way do you think the Bible teaches anything against science? According to the Bible, the natural world is God's creation. There's nothing which can be studied about the natural world which would somehow lead to the logical conclusion "therefore there is no God.", so Christians are perfectly free to follow the evidence wherever it leads. There are plenty of Christians who incorrect interpret the English translations of the Bible to somehow believe silly things like an 8,000 year old Earth, but this is as much a misreading of scripture as it is a denial of scientific evidence. That's to say it's as bad, if not worse, theology as it is bad science. >Nature evidences the divine plan, for the natural world is the work of the force or the intelligence men call God. So you're claiming that nature itself is God? That is an indefensible position if you apply any amount of logic to it. The best scientific evidence we have suggests that all of physical reality came into existence with the Big Bang; if nature itself had a beginning then how is it God and not whatever brought it into being? Who's the science denier now? >Not to mention that the concept of Hell is an obvious cope for betas and weaklings. It's only people who lack even the most basic understanding of Christianity that think it's about heaven and hell.
Open file (712.15 KB 955x585 christianity.png)
>>5747 Look here, everyone, another dimwit Christian who thinks that people calling Christianity Jewish has to do with the Jewish religion. Christianity is a product of ethnic Jews. Judaism flows from the mental prism of the Jewish people, and it as a religion is merely a code of laws dressed up with some religious garb to protect their race and assure them world domination. This is what the Mosaic Covenant is all about. Jesus was an ethnic Jew. His disciples were ethnic Jews. Paul (or should I say Saul) was an ethnic Jew. Jesus was a kike and Jewish supremacist himself, evidenced in how he called a goy woman a "dog" (Matthew 15:21-28) and told his disciples not to preach in the cities of the goyim (Matthew 10:5-6). Christianity is thoroughly within the Abrahamic Jewish mould. It is foreign to the European mind, false and life-denying slave garbage pushed onto Whites to denature them and turn them into weak cuckolds who love their rabbi more than their race. >>5748 >So you're claiming that nature itself is God? This is the only sensible position, and it is no surprise that Hitler himself was closest to this position. >The best scientific evidence we have suggests that all of physical reality came into existence with the Big Bang Look at this Abrahamist reading his Abrahamic dogma into the Big Bang theory. The Big Bang DOES NOT explain the origin of physical reality, merely that the observable universe at one point 13.8 billion years ago allegedly existed in an extremely dense state. No scientist says that this was the absolute beginning of everything. Even Kikepedia says this: >One of the common misconceptions about the Big Bang model is that it fully explains the origin of the universe. However, the Big Bang model does not describe how energy, time, and space was caused, but rather it describes the emergence of the present universe from an ultra-dense and high-temperature initial state.[121] It is misleading to visualize the Big Bang by comparing its size to everyday objects. When the size of the universe at Big Bang is described, it refers to the size of the observable universe, and not the entire universe.[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Misconceptions Now go and worship your Jew
>>5533 Nowhere in the Old Testament does it say "Go forth and conquer the world by lying, cheating, and stealing." If the Jews actually followed the teachings of Judaism then they wouldn't be doing what they're doing now. There's a reason why the majority of Jews identify as atheists, and even a sizable portion of supposedly-orthodox Jews don't even believe in God. Keep in mind that even Jesus said that Jews who don't follow him are the sons of Satan. There's absolutely no contradiction between Christianity and the realization that Jews are trying to take over the whole world.
>>5749 It's embarassingly obvious the Big Bang is no different from Big Tranny in that it's propped up by Globohomo's priests. >>5750 The Israelites repeatedly waged war on their neighbors and/or preached hate against them. With Yahweh never regulating their behavior against them. https://twitter.com/SeekerRaiden/status/1294654481607602176 This thread includes a user noting differences between the Illiad and the Old Testament.
Open file (38.32 KB 574x574 ligma.jpg)
>>5757 Kek. Are you unironically suggesting the singularity origin of the universe isn't real?
Open file (333.05 KB 1436x1652 3e1.png)
>>5564 >now
>>5758 >origin Quite the assumption. >>5750 >Nowhere in the Old Testament does it say "Go forth and conquer the world by lying, cheating, and stealing." Actually that is exactly what the Old Testament tells the Jews to do. It’s literally a strategy guide for achieving world domination. Jews are told that for exclusively following Yahweh and his laws the Jews will be granted rule over all mankind as a nation of priests (Deuteronomy 26:17-19 and 28:12, Exodus 19:6). Jews are repeatedly told that Yahweh will devour and dispossess nations (goyim) before him (Deuteronomy 7:16, Joshua 23:12-14) and that these nations are nothing to him (Isaiah 40:17). There are many genocides carried out the Jews as well in the OT that put their Holohoax mythos to shame in brutality (I Samuel 15:3, Joshua 6:21) Jews are told that they can lend to nations, but not borrow (Deuteronomy 15:6). They may not intermarry (Deuteronomy 7:3). A verse relating to Jews plundering gold and other treasures is in Zechariah 14:14. It also seems that the OT predicts the NWO in Isaiah, when it says that people from many nations (goyim) will come to Zion for instructions, the word of Yahweh all come forth from Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:3). Kings will come and pile up their wealth for the Jews (Isaiah 60:3-5). The kings will serve the Jews and foreigners shall rebuild their walls (Isaiah 60:10-11), All who resist will be destroyed (Isaiah 60:12) and humiliated, bowing before the Jews (Isaiah 60:14). The Jew will suck the milk of nations, that is of the goyim (Isaiah 60:16). Foreigners will tend their fields (Isaiah 61:5) and the Jews will be priests over all mankind, they “will feed on the wealth of nations”, again of the goyim, of US (Isaiah 61:6). Moses was evil mastermind the likes of which this world has never seen again since. Whether he really believed in this jealous tribal god is one question, but for some Semite in the desert to lay out an exact set of laws to preserve his race, limit its altruistic behavior towards others, prevent it from becoming indebted to others, prevent intermarriage with others, and to promise them complete world domination and riches for following this set of laws is genius. He understood how this world works, that might is right and race is everything. You have to quite literally be insane to be a Christian after reading all of this. Jews will exterminate you without a pang of conscience.
>>5758 >Kek. Are you unironically suggesting the singularity origin of the universe isn't real? >Kek. Are you unironically suggesting the trannies aren't women in men's bodies? >Kek. Are you unironically suggesting being a coomer is bad? >Kek. Are you unironically suggesting race is real?
>>5705 I should probably mention, the authenticity has been questioned by the revisionist Veronica Clark and Martin Bormann (the guy who contributed the most to it) has proven to be a Soviet agent.
>>5749 Modern ethnic jews are the result of khazar converts so I'm not sure what you mean by this
Open file (403.87 KB 1705x923 christcucks cope.jpg)
>>8065 >this lie again Unironically cope harder. Prove that Khazaria ever had anything more than a Jewish convert for a monarch and a tiny converted Jewish elite. I'll wait. DNA evidence proves that the Jews have their origins in the Middle East and that modern Judaism (Talmudic or Scripturalist, doesn't matter) gradually came into existence after the destruction of the Second Temple and the the destruction of the Essenes, Sadducees and Zealots by the Romans. Your religion is descended from Jewish apocalyptic eschatology and Old Testament myths. Thought up by Semites, written by Semites for Semites. Top kek
>>8063 Never trust a woman on anything you can't verify yourself, and there is no problem with the text even if Martin Bormann was a soviet agent, the text is consistent with all else we know about Hitler from a variety of sources and the text itself doesn't serve the jews cause in any way except perhaps to drive White Christians away from their indigenous religions which is bad for us and not for them.
All the Abrahamic theologies are universalist in one way or another. Even the Torah permits miscegenation. >>8065 Show us the modern DNA studies from the past decade showing such.
>>8069 this would imply that israel is a legitimate state (it isnt) Modern-day Jews have zero Semitic DNA, with even the Israelis themselves are admitting that khazar theory is true Plus modern-day Jews literally can't even speak Hebrew properly and the Judaism they practice isn't even close to original Judaism. Their Hebrew and religious practices are completely different. >anything more than a Jewish convert for a monarch and a tiny converted Jewish elite. Wouldn't the people follow their state religion?
Open file (139.59 KB 742x720 jew population tree.jpg)
>>8098 >this would imply that israel is a legitimate state (it isnt) There's no such thing as a "legitimate state", boomer. Might is right. >Modern-day Jews have zero Semitic DNA, Completely false. I should probably remind you that the Jewish diaspora has existed in more places than just Europe. Such as in the Arabian Peninsula, esp. Yemen, Iraq, Morocco, Ethiopia, etc. >genome-wide analysis of seven Jewish groups (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, Italian, Turkish, Greek, and Ashkenazi) and comparison with non-Jewish groups demonstrated distinctive Jewish population clusters, each with shared Middle Eastern ancestry, proximity to contemporary Middle Eastern populations, and variable degrees of European and North African admixture. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20560205/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23052947/ >Judaism they practice isn't even close to original Judaism. Judaism isn't a monolith. There were multiple kinds of Judaism in Judea and Galilee at the time of Jesus at it has continued to evolve since then. All religions do. Do you think the Christianity of the Church Fathers is identical to what passes for Christianity today? Of course not. >Their Hebrew...completely different. You should see what Old English from a thousand years ago looks like: >Fæder ūre þū þe eart on heofonum, Sīe þīn nama ġehālgod. Tōbecume þīn rīċe, Ġeweorðe þīn willa, on eorðan swā swā on heofonum. Ūrne dæġhwamlīcan hlāf sele ūs tōdæġ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English#The_Lord's_Prayer It's a completely different language. Languages change throughout history. That's why no one speaks Latin today, it evolved in French, Spanish, Italian, Romanian, etc.
>revilo-oliver.com/rpo/church.htm >Revilo P. Oliver: How They Stole the Church >By Professor Revilo P. Oliver, August, 1991 >The Christian churches fall into two categories. The Protestant sects necessarily depend for their authority on a belief that the Bible was divinely inspired and is therefore literally accurate. >The Roman Catholic Church was less vulnerable because less dependent on the Bible, which, for many centuries, it forbade laymen to read. Or what? These unruly gentiles should be put to death too? >Then, only a few years ago, [the Catholic Church] was suddenly shattered by an internal revolution, as sudden and drastic as the Jews’ Bolshevik revolution in Russia, and far more suprising to observers of world affairs. >If one considered the new doctrine critically, one immediately saw what had been the cardinal and most drastic change. The attitude toward the Jews that the Christian god had presumably ordained for nineteen centuries was reversed. The change was neatly illustrated by the Cardinal who is believed most likely to become the next Pope. He boasts that he is a faithful and practicing Jew, and brazenly asserts that Christianity is merely a kind of auxiliary church by which deserving goyim are admitted to some of the privileges God irrevocably bestowed on his Chosen People. (4) >4. See Liberty Bell, May 1987, pp. 6-14. >It was obvious, therefore, that the Roman Catholic Church had been captured by the Jews and would be operated in their interests. Strangely enough, this fact was generally ignored by even the most vehement adversaries of the “modernization.” (5) >Most recently, in “The Stolen Church,” December 1990, I recommended the The New Montinian Church, an impressive English translation of an important work by the Reverend D. Joaquin S enz y Arriaga, and in “The Vacant See,” April-May 1991, I reported what were evidently the conclusions of a canon lawyer that the Papacy had been vacant since the death of Pius XII in 1958. >Mr. Roddy, after noting that the American Jewish Committee and B’nai B’rith put pressure on the Vatican Council to alter Catholic doctrine in their favor, reported that the real author of the Council’s surrender to Judaism was a French Jew named Jules Isaac, who cooperated with a “Fifth Column” (7) of Marrano traitors in the Council, including the slimy Cardinal Bea, but the success of the work of subversion was to be attributed to a “priest spy,” a Jesuit who served on the staff of Bea and shuttled back and forth between the Vatican and the American Jewish Committee in New York. Jesuits certainly are a different beast than what they started as.
>According to Mr. Roddy, the decree of the Vatican Council drafted by Jules Isaac “would have gone down early,” but for the “covert help” of the “priest-spy.” >That seems implausible. It is hard to see how the “priest-spy” could have had the pivotal role attributed to him. When Roncalli, who, under the laws of the Church, was not even a Catholic, slithered onto the See of Rome as John XXIII, his election must have been procured by accomplices in the College of Cardinals, (8) and he almost certainly had in petto a scheme for capturing and Judaizing the Church, probably including the Vatican Council that he convened in 1962 and guided through its intermittent sessions to its consummation of the revolutionary take-over in 1965. Mr. Patterson notes that after Roncalli was elected Pope in 1958, the larger newspapers in this country dropped their neutral or mildly hostile attitude toward the Catholic Church and suddenly blossomed with bouquets for “good Pope John.” The Jewish Lords of the American press must have received from their superiors advice that “Roncalli is our boy.” ///theirguy/// >In an address reported by the Rocky Mountain News, 8 October 1982 (reproduced photographically in Christian News) [Malachi Martin] stated explicitly that “The Christian church is decaying, has nothing to say, and is on the way out.” He added that the other great religions of the world, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, Shintoism, “are headed in the same direction as Christianity and even faster.” He predicted the imposition of “a worldwide religion with one structure and institutions,” managed by “one great bureaucracy. And out of it will emerge the ultimate disaster.” >What is crucially significant in that speech is that he explicitly affirmed that the Jews’ religion (the basis of their racial unity) is not in the least subject to change or decay and will always endure triumphantly. “It is irradicable, (12) indestructible,” he affirmed, “there is no decay and nothing can destroy the soul of Judaism. (My italics.) >... but a sheet reproduced from typewriting and of uncertain provenance, enclosed with the copy of his book sent to me, identifies Wojtyia (John Paul II) as a Jew, son of a Kikess named Wanda Katz. Moreover, when an entire structure is weak, it requires as little as a few men, perhaps a single one, to topple it all. This is what you deserve by not basing your faith on White racial grounds but instead on a bunch of desert dwellers and carpet dealers. Jews are trying to enucleate Asatru of its Nordic bent, longing to denazify it. In many ways, they seem to succeed, turning it into a multicultural bag of logical fallacies and emotional appeals. In other words, to prevent Whites from uniting at the highest level, that of spirituality based in facts and in the illuminated flesh (the White one, if you didn't follow). Since they can do that with a religious movement that is heavily charged with ethnical overtones, it is absolutely not any surprise that turning the Catholic Church got turned into another blatant Jewish tool as the centuries old form, although useful to some extent to the Jews, proved to be too cumbersome to their world wide Zionist agenda. This is also why Jews are so vicious in their assymetrical fight against any pro-White organization, secular or religious. Final note: >7. I do not like to see ‘Fifth Column’ used in this sense, a perversion of its original meaning. When the Spanish army was delivering Spain from Judaeo-Communist terror in 1936, General Franco, on whom the command had devolved, remarked that four columns of his troops were converging on Madrid, in which there was a ‘fifth column’ composed of the decent Spaniards in that territory, who, while impotent against the power of the Communist government, necessarily sympathized with the army that was fighting to free them and would assist its efforts whenever they feasibly could. A ‘fifth column,’ therefore, is not composed of traitors, but of patriots held in subjection by an alien power.
>>5765 >Kek. Are you unironically suggesting the trannies aren't women in men's bodies? Whether this is true or not, in the end they still are freaks. Feel pity for them if you want but it ends there. >Kek. Are you unironically suggesting being a coomer is bad? If fapping regularly is good, we'd know it by now. Enough studies and even practical religious practices show it is not. >Kek. Are you unironically suggesting race is real? It is.
>>8203 All of those are "accepted" in the "scientific community." Like muh universe origin.
>>5747 >Jesus called Jews that didn't follow him the children of Satan. Martin Luther, the father of protestantism, hated the Jews. C.S.Lewis, a famous Christian theologian, hated the Jews. Anyone who thinks Christianity is pro-Jewish has clearly never read the Bible. Source on C.S Lewis hating jews? I tried searching and could not find anything except a reddit post complaining that it is "terrible and strange" that he did not write about muh holocaust https://www.reddit.com/r/CSLewis/comments/7gsl2y/did_cs_lewis_write_about_the_holocaust/ lol Christianity being pro-jew is a jewish lie. Everyone should read on the jews and thier lies by Martin Luther, I have attached the pdf.
>>8397 >Christianity being pro-jew is a jewish lie. And here we see another useful idiot for the Jews thinking that just because some Christians over time have spoke out against Judaism AS A RELIGION that means that Christians are totally based and opposed to the ultimate Jewish scheme towards JWO. One who lays the poison for does not sample it himself if he is smart. An ethnic Jew who LARPs a Christian is and will always be a kike Christianity denatures the goyim, blunts their racial instincts and gives them a morality of slaves. All preparation for even greater poison later such as Communism
>>8397 It is anti-Jew insofar as it criticizes some of them and wants Jews to convert. It still recognizes the authority of the fathers of the law. It still is a religion that makes the Jews necessary as an essential part of the story.

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms
Delete
Report

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)

no cookies?