>Do we want slaves and slavery?
No, slavery is degenerate and white man's destiny is to be free, while enslaving lesser races always backfires and leads to extinction in the long run. That being said, some people are naturally inclined towards obedience and simple but demanding labor. Nature has kind of balanced things out, remove kikes, kike ideologies (including the ever-pervading Talmudic law and it's derivatives) and non-whites, and people will eventually fit in just right where they belong, they will even cherish their roles as long as they are appreciated by the others. Women need considerably less rights though, as they don't have the rational capacity and mental maturity to have as much freedom as they have today, which leads to absolute corruption and decay. Once we eugenically breed women to be near the level of men, then they can have their rights back. You'd be surprised how easy it is to create a near-perfect society as long as trash is being thrown out instead of being appointed as rulers. Even people like Plato figured it out back in the day.
>How many of us are separatist and not world-order people?
I'm for white ethnoglobe, with some non-white minorities made of best people that their race had to offer. Since that's hardly viable, our best bet would be to forge a white ethnostate somewhere, somehow, and get all like-minded people there. All while preserving the unique ethnicities and nationalities instead of going full amerimutt. You know what fasces represent, right?
>(PRC is ethnonationalist and authoritarian and Traditionalist, RF is same).
China is ironically quite close to being national-socialist, but they are way too corrupt, materialistic and have horrible mentality. Also a testing ground for gigakike social experiments. Russia is personal property of Khazar oligarchs although people can be rather decent. I think Russians are prevailing in spite of the Jewish mafia ruling their country, rather than thanks to it.
>I dont think an avatar of god is required to bring in the mini golden age of kali yuga
Maybe not THE god, but a lesser avatar for certain. Do you think it just happens on it's own? It takes TREMENDOUS will of the right group of people to achieve something like that. Divine people, Heroes, Demigods. This is what most of NSDAP leadership was.
>10k years out of 432k yrs
Those predictions are ridiculous and a result of profane minds contemplating higher wisdom. The same Dravidians of today who wallow in their own poo for eternity waiting for something that will never come.
>the idea that you can find a video of vegans/vegetarians doing something stupid means nothing. i can easily present you videos of meat eaters acting retarded
The difference being that they are doing it precisely because of veganism/vegetarianism. Vegetarianism is a pointless diet in a post-scarcity society (unless due to health issues). It was always meant for ascetics following a particular path, but there is nothing inherently more noble about it, that's just idiotic virtue signalling not rooted in reason. Vegans are mostly mentally ill people. I have yet to meet a vegan who is a sane and balanced person.
>or is that just your speculation?
It's pretty much obvious. It was not part of Aryan lore until they started mixing with Dravidians on a larger scale. It was either invented in an attempt to stop Dravidians from stealing Aryans' cattle, or it was a Dravidian belief to begin with.
>candala actually means dog eater, so no.
Meaning they had no access to more edible animals.
>I think that ancient aryans ate meat but only through the rituals of sacrifices
Meat was very scarce back than, in fact, it was quite scarce until relatively recently. Our ancestors could afford eating it only occasionally. It was a special occasion, and it was naturally associated with religious rituals because it was a delicacy (food worthy of gods) , and people needed context for eating it.
>personally i am inclined to beleive that the original aryans and the whole world followed the jain religion and that animal sacrifice was a later invention as religion became diluted due to global degeneration.
I'd rather say it was the opposite. Not eating meat was mostly a result of cope and oversocialization, but you may have a point, maybe people just really wanted to eat meat (because it's natural and delicious) so they found an excuse for it by masking it as a sacrifice to the gods. On another hand, ancient Aryans could hardly spread so far by conquest if they didn't eat it. Maybe Aryan expansion was a result of dvapara yuga. A lot of things to consider.