/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 5120

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

More

(used to delete files and postings)


“Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz”


Open file (54.74 KB 640x713 hitler brown house.jpg)
Rules / Moderation / Request / Meta Anonymous Board owner 04/02/2020 (Thu) 17:59:38 No.1
WELCOME TO /FASCIST/, PLEASE READ RULES BEFORE POSTING Anon Cafe on Tor: tew7tfz7dvv4tsom45z2wseql7kwfxnc77btftzssaskdw22oa5ckbqd.onion/fascist/ another fallback location (Neinchan): vvadkyuldkwon6za.onion/fascist/catalog.html Welcome to /fascist/ on Anon Cafe! /fascist/ is a board for discussion of fascism in its various manifestations and, in a more general sense, third-position ideology (e.g. Strasserism, etc) and positions that fall outside of the /pol/ - /leftypol/ dichotomy. Though this board is centered around the discussion of fascist movements, leaders and ideology, everybody is permitted to post here regardless of political beliefs, as long as they debate in good faith. Non-fascists and opposing beliefs of all kinds are welcome as long as they respect the rules of this board! This thread will also serve as a thread for requests to moderation, banners and general bitching BOARD RULES 1. Global rules apply 2. No spam, no flooding, serial double- / triple-posting in the same thread within a short period of time will result in a short ban 3. No fedposting* 4. No avatarfagging without reason 5. No pornography (non-sexualized nudity permitted) 6. Gore should be spoiled and relevant to the topic if posted 7. No self-advertising outside of specifically designated threads. No Discord shilling, period. 8. Threads with basic questions not conductive to discussion should go in the QTDDTOT 9. Literature requests should go in the proper thread 10. Meta content should be posted here >>1 *fedposting is encouraging anons to "take action" in a way that reads like a federal agent is posting it, e.g. "Hey kid, you wanna bomb a federal building?" Some archives of the old board: https://web.archive.org/web/*/8ch.net/fascist/
Edited last time by FashBO on 06/10/2020 (Wed) 17:20:47.
Open file (1.29 MB 1200x840 1411064464181.png)
>>1432 >Jews are the root of evil Jews are evil. they are not the root of evil. Jews do everything they do because of their greed and love of money. They have limitless funds and don't do anything but use it to make more money which essentially has no meaning to them. They will always be an empty soulless people because of this. Their defiance of God, nature, and everything good stems from their love of money. They hated Jesus because he told them they can't buy their way into heaven or into God's favor. The pharisees and sadducees were jewish sects that argued that you must do good works and keep score to get to heaven. Jesus told them that their rewards are already paid in full in this world and it wont help them after, that they need faith and genuine belief; something their people are incapable of. He told them that doing good works didnt mean anything either since jews were known for "if i do X amount of good deeds it doesnt matter how many goyim i rape" thats why they claim goyim arent people as well. they also would jew God's law for example the entire talmud is the Jews Jewing God's law. "oh we cant kill? but what if i write down mental gymnastics to twist the word enough to make it not count as killing" This is the reason jews are the way they are. its defiance of God and that's all it's ever been. Jesus essentially told them "you know what killing is, and nomatter how much mental gymastics you do, you know the INTENT and you can't lie to God" This is why germany still has laws against small print and legal terms exist such as "spirit of the law" Jews were told they couldnt leave their house so they'd redefine house to home and hang strings around entire cities to say "as long as we stay within that string we are home :^)" then Jesus comes and says "you know what the law means and you know what youre doing, and none of what youre doing matters in the eyes of God, because he knows your INTENT." and this caused them to want to kill him. There are so many examples of this throughout the bible its an entire book about jews jewing god's law until jesus tells them "YOU KNOW WHAT YOURE DOING AND THATS ALL THAT COUNTS AND IT DOESNT MATTER HOW MUCH GOOD YOU PRETEND TO DO" Jews even preach ignorance so that the ignorant masses technically arent sinning. "if i think im doing right, am i sinning?" They want to uproot everything that is known and natural for this very reason. no different than the days in noah worshipping gold calves and money while celebrating debauchery. why do you think they seek to uproot the meaning of gender? its not gay if its a female with a penis because what is female? what is sex? what is anything? They think this will somehow "trick" God.
>>1441 yes. this reminds me of a quote from Frank Herbert's Dune novels: >Once you acquire a marketplace soul, the souk becomes the totality of existence. and it's true, corporations have long been an integral faction of globalism, which seeks to destroy peoples and nations and reduce us to serfdom. one of the worst aspects of Capitalism is planned obsolescence. appliances and products were once made with quality and built to last, now they're fancy garbage that's designed to break down within a few years. this creates an ephemeral economy, in which we're supposed to constantly spend and consoom, burning through material stuff, and stay 'current' by discarding anything from last year. it's massively wasteful and exploitative. of course, there is a place for the free market, but it must be built on fairness, transparency, and sustainability, with profit-seeking reined in by more important considerations. what we live in now is a degenerate form of the free market. >>1449 as I've said before, degenerate forms depend upon the original qualities. Judaism always emphasized the primacy of Law, so its degenerate, Pharisaic form relies on autistic, letter of the law pilpul, seeking loopholes and arbitrary enforcement. the same pattern can be seen elsewhere. Islam was always spirited, so its degenerate form is a violent death cult. Christianity taught meekness, forgiveness and acceptance, so its degenerate form consists of watered-down doctrine and shallow platitudes. the Free Market used competition and contracts to provide goods & services in much greater quality and quantity, so its degenerate form is based on wasteful hyperconsumption and manipulation. >They want to uproot everything that is known and natural for this very reason. no different than the days in noah worshipping gold calves and money while celebrating debauchery. why do you think they seek to uproot the meaning of gender? its not gay if its a female with a penis because what is female? what is sex? what is anything? They think this will somehow "trick" God. this ties into Postmodernism, the theory that denies inherent meaning and universal standards; instead, everything depends on your perspective, so things can mean whatever you want them to. this is used to justify degeneracy of all kinds, including gender-bending.
>>1486 >there is a place for the free market, but it must be built on fairness, transparency, and sustainability, with profit-seeking reined in by more important considerations. what we live in now is a degenerate form of the free market. Honestly, I think we need to dump a lot of the "free market" idea (maybe not entirely, but at least in its current form). Limiting trade is important for reasons of national security (e.g. guaranteeing access and control of war materials and vital resources) or for the protection of infant industries that would be destroyed by outside competition. I see national autarky as extremely important. The end result of the free trade worldview is the world of today. A lot of centralization of states over the last few centuries and the integration of them into larger and larger units has been directly driven by capitalistic goals (as well as other ones, obviously), see the slow unification of Germany into a single political entity in the 19th century or the EU with its no borders and free trade zones. This granted, I'm no economist and I hold views that actually would seek degrowth in the long term, and I see local production and barter as greater social goods than what we see today. It is a bit utopian though, admittedly
>>1499 >national security >incubation of fledgling industries yes, those are two valid reasons for economic protectionism. trade barriers such as tariffs, quotas, and sanctions have their roles to play in a healthy economy, as long as they're used proportionately and correctly. another reason is penalizing countries for exploitative practices, eg Trump's trade war with China. there has to be a balance. on one hand, hermit kingdoms who seal off their economies with Chinese walls end up impoverished. on the other, neoliberalism has led to outsourcing, exploitation, rust belts, and in many ways is the economic basis of globohomo. in other words, trade is good, too much trade is bad. by the Free Market, I mean a competitive economy with a relative lack of guilds, monopolies, and centralized controls, existing alongside the public sector, with contracts and fair practices enforced by the State. this is not to be confused with the neoliberal regime we live under.
>>1527 >in other words, trade is good, too much trade is bad. This is pretty much my view as well. We should ensure that, on one hand, that we are able to, if the situation were ever to call for it, to function self-sufficiently from all other states, but beyond that there is no real issue in my mind with trade. People have always done it in one form or another for obvious reasons, because it is often beneficial to both parties.
>>1486 what you said about judaism is accurate. what you said about islam and christianity is now. christianity came before islam and emphasized faith and intent over arbitrary rules; its degenerate form is works/rules based and the very same churches that spout that belief also praise israel. islam was a demonic death cult from the beginning when a demon posing as an angel (that muslims think was the angel gabriel) physically attacked mohammad into yet another violent works/law based religion like judaism. **i also have the posts on christian orthodoxy and why many have not experienced true christianity if anyone is interested.**
>>1530 each nation should be self-sufficient and trade their surplus. it's the neoliberal way to make countries dependent on international trade and (((lending))). >>1535 > christianity came before islam and emphasized faith and intent over arbitrary rules I should've mentioned this. it's true, a major tenet of Christianity is that intention and character are far more important than outward observance. in any case, its degenerate form is compromised; we see this in prosperity gospel, leftist political influence, and certain Vatican II policies. as for Islam, it may be Abrahamic, and it may have spawned a violent strain of fundamentalism in the modern world. however, I have a hard time condemning it as a whole, given all they achieved during the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates, and their social conservatism. with that said, it's still fundamentally incompatible with the West.
>>1598 Yes, the degenerate form of Christianity has been subverted by Jews and focuses on the very tenets Jesus criticized in Judaism. That has been obvious from the start with most churches outside of orthodoxy and catholicism with the fact that the current pope is also a false pope. however they still teach the same values (in regards to character/intent > anything else) for example forgiveness counts only if it's genuine. Interesting fact about it is the "faith" route is seen as the easiest, but its the one people have the most difficulty with. because "just believing" is the only aspect that you cant just phone-in or lie about. there is no way around it other than to be genuine and honest. You can see why jews have the most trouble. there is no way to trick or jew it. Islam is extremely degenerate even in its most fundamentalist forms. as far as social conservatism goes for example; in addition to virgins in the afterlife, they are also given pre-pubescent boy slaves. they also practice pedastry with boys and say its not homosexual because the boys arent men and the sex is not part of being homosexual. this is allowed to be practiced in places that condemn homosexuals with death. (notice the same pattern of jewish wordsmithing to get around intentions) These rewards were specifically designed because of the extremely high rate and acceptance of pedastry with young boys in the arab communities.
>>1605 >they are also given pre-pubescent boy slaves This is false though and comes from that poorly researched "Professor Kafir" series of posts. The handsome young boys in the Islamic heaven are for servicing food and drinks, not for providing means of committing homosexual acts. In the part of his post when he mentions this, he goes out on a limb and says "One might suspect that their task won't simply be to serve beverages" >(52:24) Youths as fair as hidden pearls will be set apart to wait upon them; they will be running to and fro to serve them. 56:17-21 >immortal youths shall go about them with goblets and ewers and a cup filled with a drink drawn from a running spring, a drink by which their minds will not be clouded nor will it cause drunkenness; they will also go about them with the fruits of which they may choose, and with the flesh of any fowl that they may desire to eat Damn, young immortal youths will serve the people of Heaven drinks, fruit and fowl! The horror! 76:19 >There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them [as beautiful as] scattered pearls. Homosexuality is a major sin in Islam, and it is clear from the Qur'an itself that sin is not permitted in Heaven - (56:25) Also daily reminder that the "bacha bazi" practice, which was an Afghan custom, was actually more or less eradicated by the Taliban who were, undeniably, puritan and fundamentalist Muslims https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/military-overlooked-sexual-abuse-by-afghan-allies-investigation-says/ >Following the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989 and the collapse of Najibullah's regime in 1992, the country fell into chaos as various mujahideen factions fought for control. Mullah Omar went back to the madrassa at Singesar, although when he returned to religious teaching is unclear.[51] According to one legend, in 1994, he had a dream in which a woman told him: "We need your help; you must rise. You must end the chaos. Allah will help you."[51] Mullah Omar started his movement with less than 50 armed madrassah students who were simply known as the Taliban (Pashtun for 'students'). His recruits came from madrassas located in Afghanistan and the Afghan refugee camps which were located across the border in Pakistan. They fought against the rampant corruption which had emerged during the civil war period and were initially welcomed by Afghans who were weary of warlord rule. Apparently, Omar became sickened by the abusive raping of children by warlords and turned against their authority in the mountainous country of Afghanistan from 1994 onwards.[52] >The practice of bacha bazi by warlords was one of the key factors in Mullah Omar mobilizing the Taliban.[54] Reportedly, in early 1994, Omar led 30 men armed with 16 rifles to free two young girls who had been kidnapped and raped by a warlord, hanging him from a tank gun barrel.[55] https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2018/01/24/the-revised-afghanistan-criminal-code-an-end-for-bacha-bazi/
>>1610 Also inb4 I'm called a mudshit for doing my research
We must enact the final solution to /pol/tards in our midst.
>>1624 I haven't seen anything egregiously bad but as always, report anything that you think might be breaking rules. Doesn't mean I'll necessarily act on it, but I always consider them.
>>1610 >they are also given pre-pubescent boy slaves >This is false though lol more mudshit shilling >Bacha bāzī (Dari: بچه بازی‎, lit. "boy play"; from چه bacheh, "boy", and بازی bazi "play, game") is a slang term for a wide variety of activities involving sexual relations between younger adolescent men or boys, who are called dancing boys, and older men. The custom is connected to sexual slavery and child prostitution.[1 >pic related it's you, sorry you'll never be white
>>1627 Funny how my post addresses this issue and you just ignore it. Reading must be hard for you, I understand.
>>1629 >too dumb to realize that pointing out where I already disproved my nigger-tier point is sheer idiocy Holy shit I'm arguing with a brainlet
>>1630 Go back to cuck/pol/, it's clear that you don't post here much
>>1610 the Taliban did clamp down on the practice, but it's had a resurgence since then. it does seem to be a non-Islamic middle eastern/central asian custom. even the 72 virgins story might be propaganda for all I know, I'd have to delve in further. I'll stick to my belief that Islam, while not Western, was not degenerate in the past.
>>1633 The 72 virgins story has more grounding in reality from the little that I have seen, though like a lot of things there's debate on the question on how allegorical description of Heaven may actually be. It's like the few parts of the Qur'an that describe various attributes of Allah in an anthropomorphic fashion, such as referring to his hand or eye. Some schools would say that this is obviously metaphorical, while others seem to take a more literal approach where this is indeed referring to some sort of hand or eye, but since Allah is a totally unique and unparalleled being in Islam, it is apparently nothing like and in no way comparable to any earthly or material equivalent that one could imagine. Basically typical bullshit pilpuling and rationalization like you see in most religions. I don't really concern myself with how degenerate Islam may or may not be, but I do know that it denies certain eternal Laws of Nature, rendering it in my eyes a false religion, and certainly no religion for White people to follow. Enough of this Abrahamic sickness, I say.
>>1632 >>1633 make me samefag >not degenerate in the past >religious founder literally "marries" a 6 year old stop digging
>>1635 t. hag lover
>>1610 >This is false though and comes from that poorly researched "Professor Kafir" series of posts. The handsome young boys in the Islamic heaven are for servicing food and drinks Do your research retard. I will quote your noble quran to you. From 56: the Sura Al Waqi'ah 10. And those foremost [(in Islamic Faith of Monotheism and in performing righteous deeds) in the life of this world on the very first call for to embrace Islam,] will be foremost (in Paradise). 11. These will be those nearest to Allah. 12. In the Gardens of delight (Paradise). 13. A multitude of those (foremost) will be from the first generations (who embraced Islam). 14. And a few of those (foremost) will be from the later time (generations). 15. (They will be) on thrones woven with gold and precious stones, 16. Reclining thereon, face to face. 17. They will be served by immortal boys, 18. With cups, and jugs, and a glass from the flowing wine, And from 76: Sura Al-Insan 19. And round about them will (serve) boys of everlasting youth. If you see them, you would think them scattered pearls. DO YOUR RESEARCH, FAGGOT PEDOPHILE APOLOGIST Also, what good does gold do for a man in the afterlife? sounds like bribery from a satanic force. maybe you shouldnt be worshipping satan in your pedophile faggot demon cult, right?
>>1661 Where is the implication of sex in this quoted passage?
>>1662 Where in the original post did they say specifically that the boys were specifically having sex? where in the book that describes the boy slaves being attractive and everlastingly young does it specifically say theyre for sex? its implied in that post no more than its implied in your shitty book but somehow you interpreted it that way. i wonder why? Where does the quran specifically say the 72 virgins are for sexual use?
WTF happened to /fascist that we're having this shit discussion in the RULES THREAD in the first place?! On julay (and before) there was a containment thread for black-pilled proto-converts and mud shills and everywhere else this abrahamic pedo lover crap got rightly banned right away.
>>1675 You get involved with a kike like Mark and don't go along with him your board ends up getting flooded with bullshit.
>>1675 Something something about it being more difficult to refute a lie than make it, although that shitskin got BTFO in every thread where he tried to shill for his sand religion, but no matter how buttmad he got, he kept coming for more. Abrahamistic slaves have some kind of masochistic fetish, they enjoy getting whipped and beaten, it feeds them. It could also be a group of kikes that shill for other kosher beliefs as well, trying to see which ones stick around.
>>1675 it started when I mentioned Islam in passing while discussing trade and degeneration. I should've known better.
BO will you finally pull your head out of your ass and make sure threads stay on topic? You did it on julay's, why not here?
>>1880 >BO will you finally pull your head out of your ass and make sure threads stay on topic? You did it on julay's, why not here? I assume you’re talking about the Tarrant thread. I hadn’t cracked down on it because (1) I was participating in the argument myself against them and (2) no one had reported any of the posts so I assumed no one minded that much. I can start to clean it up if that’s what you want. They should probably make their own threads if they want to shill it so bad
Edited last time by FashBO on 06/19/2020 (Fri) 16:51:24.
>>1881 Thanks a lot for the quick action! I was afraid you'd given up on the board after all the hassle. If they want to argue their point they can do it in a separate thread. Fascism starts with order.
>>1886 > I was afraid you'd given up on the board after all the hassle. I'd have nowhere good to post without here, so it would take a lot to drive me away! No problem though, it did need to be cleaned up a bit. I didn't realize how much it had gotten off track until I realized that I had deleted 46 posts, leaving only 77 left.
As awkward as the fedchan board deletion might have been, it looks like you dodged a bullet. https://archive.fo/2vEkN Acidkike is working to implement a "system" where he can individually identify and "ban" specific tor users. This is some of the most radioactive shit I've seen in awhile.
Open file (194.35 KB 977x388 ClipboardImage.png)
Open file (83.81 KB 879x525 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2386 I don't even know how that would work, but it does glow brighter than the sun. I'm glad I finally caved into anons' protests before this stuff started to be implemented.
>>2388 He's literally going to use harvested user data to create profiles on specific tor posters for bans. It's about 10 times worse than I thought it would be.
>>2388 While unfortunate this is not as new and big of a threat as it's made out to be. Every Tor user is routed through several nodes but of course the last exit node will have an ip adress which can be resolved to a board ID just as a normal ip can. In fact the Tor exit node ip's are normal ip adresses. It's just that all hundreds of thousands of Tor users share them roughly 800 to 1,000 nodes. So issuing users individual board ID's accordingly won't do much in decreasing opsec since I'm pretty sure the alphabet boys are already capable of harvesting those exit node ip's from the boards for correlation attacks. And even if not without knowing there the data originally came from, i.e. the entry node,it doesn't help them much.
>>2397 He's not banning based on exit nodes, he's literally harvesting data to profile individual users.
>>2398 >he's literally harvesting data to profile individual users. Where do you read that? Certainly not in those caps that are no proof for anything whatsover. What data could you harvest from a Tor poster anyways? You get the comment text (open to see anyways), time and date (open to see anyways) and then you have the exit node's ip. The latter is not open to see (for now) but that's just on the surface, I wonder actually what good it should do when any admin or janny can see the ip right now when he enters his account. If he wants to ip ban he can do that already. So if it's anything else tell us exactly what and how data will be harvested or I'll consider this just another FUD campaign albeit a stupid one. Also anyone, stop posting cuckflared shit, you need to enable javascript to see it and that is far more dangerous than a board ID which is based on an exit node ip that is shared by hundreds of users.
>>2401 Lynxchan can already ban based on individual tor nodes, that is not what he is proposing. ID's based on tor nodes is not the concern, and not even what he's proposing either. He's saying he's going to use individual browser harvested data to identify each tor poster and ban them independently of their tor node based on the profile created from that data. Banning/assigning ID's based on tor exit nodes would be pointless. It takes a split second to change your exit node.
>>2402 >individual browser harvested data Frankly, I had this in mind when I wrote the above but I didn't think he would be that stupid. Tor left in it's standard configuration will basically give the same browser data, it's true there are some difference but there are still tens of thousands of Tor browsers with the same configuration. I seriously doubt they can do much with what they attempt. This is the website from the Electronic Frontier Foundation where you can check your browser profile and how unique it is. https://panopticlick.eff.org/
>>2405 Which is why it's so concerning. Tor is designed around being difficult to profile, it's literally the entire point of the tor browser bundle. And yet Acidkike is confident he's able to do it effectively, yet in the thread refused to go into detail about it and hasn't actually refuted any of the accusations about how it works. Couple that with the fact I'm almost certain the sites source isn't available to the public and you have a very sketchy situation. I wish it were just ID's based on tor nodes, believe me.
>>2407 At this point I still think he overestimates his own abilities or underestimates the task at hand. With luck he might be able to differentiate between subgroups of Tor users, each hundreds strong but that's about it. Naturally, anonymity is greatly reduced when java script is enabled, though that begs the question why people use Tor at all, then. May be he's refering to those? In any case using Tor browser with highest security should be safe and I refuse to believe that some guy wrote some code for an imageboard software that outsmarted the NSA.
Open file (166.97 KB 986x568 acidkike tor captcha.png)
>>2408 8moe data harvesting clarification. I retract literally nothing I said given the retarded information acid provided at the time about how fucking sketchy what he was alluding to was.
>>2386 Acid tried to catalog people in Gamergate as well. He's known to act like this and that's why there was a huge push back against him. You never touch anything he does because he's got fed links and tracks people. >>2408 He has fed connections, if not being one himself by now. He could easily be using it as a testing ground for new software. Mark brings in a userbase they can track and test it out on.
Why was my thread discussing inbreeding deleted? It's a topic not touched on but core to history in Europe. It wasn't pornographic in any way.
Open file (536.37 KB 451x542 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2542 Honestly, I had just assumed it was a troll thread on par with the "gay / tranny fascist" threads that appear every now and then, and so I deleted it. If it wasn't just a troll thread maybe the question would be better posed in the unpopular opinions thread, but if you really want to make a thread on the issue I'll let it go at least until it gets reported a bunch unless it gets some good discussion. Up to you. At least put you opinion on the issue in it though
>>2543 When you put an opinion in OP you influence the people responding to you throughout the thread. I would rather let others post their opinions and then post mine a few down so it doesn't become OP vs thread.
>>2548 That's a very stupid way to go about it, especially since glow niggers and shills are known to make retarded threads then just never respond to any of the posts and leave themselves at (1). If you're going to make an OP on the clearnet with an ID about a controversial topic you should engage in that thread with the same ID as to make it clear you're posting in good faith and not just sliding with weird threads about sexual degeneracy.
>>2548 >When you put an opinion in OP you influence the people responding to you throughout the thread Not necessarily in the way you think, I think it’s a good way to start a conversation rather than just posting some boring one-liner.
>>2551 >>2559 You don't post it then leave. You post, wait until it has 5-10 replies and then post your opinion. You become part of the conversation rather than one side of it. I'm not a fan of threads where you can see OP babysitting it.
Hey BO, you know that scaremongering white-killings shitpost you deleted? 1) it was actual botspam, you can find the exact same post on a heap of other IBs and forums 2) THE MADMAN POSTED IT ON /leftypol/

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms
Delete
Report

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)

no cookies?