R: 271 / I: 80 /
Rules / Moderation / Request / Meta
WELCOME TO /FASCIST/, PLEASE READ RULES BEFORE POSTING
Anon Cafe on Tor
Neinchan Bunker (TOR ONLY):
/fascist/ is a board for discussion of fascism in its various manifestations and, in a more general sense, third-position ideology (e.g. Strasserism, etc). Though this board is centered around the discussion of fascist movements, leaders and ideology, non-fascists are permitted to post here regardless of political beliefs as long as they respect the rules of this board! This thread will also serve as a thread for requests to moderation (currently just me), banners and general bitching.
1. Global rules apply (see https://anon.cafe/.static/pages/globalRules.html
2. Literature requests should go in the proper thread >>4
3. Threads with basic questions not conductive to discussion should go in the QTDDTOT
4. No avatarfagging without reason
5. No self-advertising. No Discord shilling.
6. No degeneracy*
7. No spam, flooding, serial double- / triple posting
8. No fedposting**
* Note on 'No degeneracy'
For purposes of this board, this means no unspoilered gore, no pornography, no advocating for race-mixing, transgender ideology, homosexuality, bisexuality, sexualizing prepubescents, etc.
** Note on 'fedposting'
Fedposting will be defined as posts that actively attempt to rouse users
into carrying out terrorist attacks or acts of violence. Speaking positively about Breivik, Tarrant or similar individuals does not
count as fedposting, think more of ""Hey kid, you wanna bomb a federal building?" type posts
WHAT TYPE OF CONTENT WE WANT
Here on /fascist/ we want high quality on-topic discussion and threads. If a major news event occurs (e.g. war breaks out, major terrorist attack, migrant crisis 2.0, another 9/11-tier event), go ahead and make a full thread. WE ARE NOT A NEWS BOARD
, generally speak. We don’t care about what Trump did today or muh Republicans and Democrats. That should go to the /pol/ of your choice.
LOW-EFFORT THREADS ARE DISCOURAGED
This means we don’t want here on /fascist/ shit-tier threads which do not foster any interesting discussion or contribute anything of worth. This style of thread will in most cases be locked after being directed to the QTDDTOT or outright deleted. Examples of this type of thread:
>what do fascists think of X Y Z
>can gays / blacks / trannies / Jews be fascist?
IS FUN ALLOWED HERE??
Of course, but the main objective of this board is to foster actual discussion about fascism, third positionism and related ideologies, movements and literature.
Some archives of the old boards:
R: 150 / I: 75 /
Fascist and Third Position Books
Post good works that you've read and ask for recommendations ITT.
BASIC READING LIST
>Mein Kampf (Adolf Hitler)
The most reliable translations are the Stalag edition and the Thomas Dalton translation.
>Hitler's Second Book / Zweites Buch (Adolf Hitler)
>The Program of the NSDAP (Gottfried Feder)
>The Manifesto for the Breaking of Interest Slavery (Gottfried Feder)
>Hitler's Table Talk
Black Front / Strasserism:
>German Tomorrow by Dr. Otto Strasser
>Deutschlands Erneuerung by Dr. Otto Strasser (in German only)
>The Lightning and the Sun (Savitri Devi)
>And Time Rolls On (Savitri Devi)
>The Impeachment of Man (Savitri Devi)
Iron Guard / Romanian Fascism:
>For my Legionaries by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
British Union of Fascists (BUF):
>Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered (Oswald Mosley)
>Tomorrow We Live (Oswald Mosley)
>My Life (Oswald Mosley)
>Fascism v. Jewry (William Joyce)
>National Socialism Now (William Joyce)
>The Coming Corporate State (A. Raven Thompson)
>Spring Comes Again (Jorian Jenks)
>Origins and Doctrine of Fascism (Giovanni Gentile)
>CasaPound Italia platform: http://www.casapounditalia.org/p/who-we-are.html
Miscellaneous Secondary Literature Worth Reading:
By "worth reading" I mean not totally kiked garbage. These are not fascist authors.
>The Wages of Destruction (Adam Tooze)
>Holy Legionary Youth (Roland Clark)
>The Nazi War on Cancer (Robert Proctor)
>The Occult Roots of Nazism (Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke)
>Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the Politics of Identity (Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke)
>Japan's Holy War (Walter Skya)
Cultured Thug is also a good YouTube channel for overviews of fascist literature:
R: 592 / I: 110 /
QTDDTOT - Questions That Don't Deserve Their own Threads
If you have a one-liner question that won't generate much discussion and isn't related to moderation or requests, or want to post something of interest to /fascist/s but doesn't deserve a thread, post it ITT.
That last thread went super fast.
R: 209 / I: 76 /
Fascist News General /fng/
This thread is for discussion of recent happenings that may be of interest to users of this board. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, news involving fascist parties around the world, info related to government / corporate responses to White nationalist / fascist activities, and events that are likely of interest to users here, such as declining race-relations, anti-White policies and Jewish-related scheming.
This thread existed on 8chan, but it's gonna be here on a trial basis. If it attracts too many outsiders, it will be deleted. If it results in garbage-tier discussion not healthy to /fascist/, it will be deleted. This is still /fascist/, not a free-for-all area.
PLEASE ATTEMPT TO ARCHIVE CONTENT, VIDEOS AND USE ALTERNATIVE SITES WHERE POSSIBLE, THANK YOU
Twitter alternative: https://nitter.net/
R: 299 / I: 88 /
All-purpose interesting links or sources thread.
R: 380 / I: 61 /
Unpopular Opinions #2: The Autism Continues
Last thread is about to hit bump limit. Post ‘em.
R: 255 / I: 111 /
All-Purpose Dharmic Philsophy Thread
R: 67 / I: 11 /
Polygamy Vs Monogamy
The title says it all gentlemen. This should be a heavy topic that can generate a lot of conversation. Polygamous vs monogamous could drastically change the culture, genetic composition, and thus the destiny of a nation.
I think that a mostly monogamous society that accepts polygamy, for higher value males, would be ideal and would most accurate reflect the natural breeding design of men vs women. Common misconceptions is that polygamy wouldnt respect the ritual of marriage (marriage would still be a thing) and that if 1 person becomes polygamous or wants to be monogamous then suddenly everyone has to be.
I dont know how to quote a post from another thread but anon in the book thread dropped a bunch of pro monogamy resources and theres anons derailing the dharmic religion thread over this right now.
R: 13 / I: 6 /
The True History and Distribution of the White Race
ITT we gather and discuss information concerning the origins, history and hisortical distribution of the White race. This thread is not primarily about genetics, though it may play a small supplementary part, with due caution being afforded towards such information.
Areas of Potential Discussion:
>Where did Whites in ancient times live? How big of a percentage of the population were they?
>Why does White Genocide seem to be something that has gone on for millennia rather than decades?
R: 203 / I: 58 /
Aryan Religion Thread
This thread is for White pagan religions, or more broadly, non-Abrahamic pro-White religious and philosophical discussion
R: 225 / I: 119 /
This thread is for the discussion of Japanese culture, religion and similar aspects of this nation. Of all the non-White countries of the world, I admire Japan the most for their collectivism, aesthetics and extreme fanaticism in war and selfless dedication to a cause they believe. The ideas of bushido and makoto (sincerity, purity of motive) are all very much worth studying for anyone.
Some book suggestions (abbreviated and expanded from >>2998
>The Way of the Samurai (Yukio Mishima - this book is on the Hagakure)
>The Nobility of Failure: Tragic Heroes in the History of Japan (Ivan Morris)
>Shinto: The Kami Way
R: 4 / I: 2 /
I've been recently reading a couple of books from known philsophers such as Pluto's Republic, Michaveli's The Prince, and Nietzsche's book, On the Genealogy of Morality and have been enjoying their ideas of interpretations of politics and the metaphysical, although I haven't read anything else these past months but these books, are there any philsophers who are or aren't fascists?
R: 25 / I: 5 /
Roping in reactionaries
It's pretty simple how to rope in non-pozzed anarchists and liberals but the reactionary group (Strasserists, Stalinists, PaleoCons, Monarchists) seem to be distancing themselves from fascism. How can we fix this? Spamming "read corporatist theory" on twitter?
R: 27 / I: 15 /
Bought this just now. $7usd ebook.
Looks a lot like what we've all been talking about for the last several years.
I'll look into what is required to de-drm it so I can upload it here (too new for libgen and b-ok to have it) for you, but failing that it's cheap.
R: 179 / I: 144 /
/fascist/ OC general
For OC and /fascist/-related content.
R: 42 / I: 14 /
The Natural Order
How exactly is the Natural Order defined? How do we discern its laws? Should we always adhere to the Natural Order when it conflicts with human conventions?
NatSocs like to mention this concept a lot, and while I myself consider myself a NatSoc and refer to this concept quite often, I am thinking that I need to flesh out my idea of what exactly this implies and how exactly it should be interpreted. We know that Hitler correctly pointed out, as have many others, that man is an integral part of Nature, never able to truly divorce himself no matter how hard he may try to “conquer” it. He remains subject to its laws regardless of how much he may protest their “injustice” or “cruelty” according to his moralistic humanist view.
It seems to me that the Natural Order is primarily defined as the essential nature of things in general, more narrowly human beings and their behavior, independently of social engineering, nurture or anything else, referring to what is natural and healthy to us. Given this definition which I adhere to, degeneracy or decadence is anything contrary to this. What exactly does this imply (certainly not exhaustive):
>inequality between races, men, men and women, etc
>hierarchy (rule of the strong over the weak)
>life defined in terms of struggle
Is it always good to live in accordance with this? From my view it seems to imply that the Jews are ‘rightfully’ (according to natural justice) in power now, but this power is not absolute and inviolable, as life is struggle. The weak being ruled by the strong is natural justice. The weak are often utilized by the strong in their plans – sidestepping, I think, Socrates’ objection to Callicles’ claims in Gorgias. Sheep are guided by shepards, rarely do they spontaneously do anything en masse. Of course we are left to define what is meant by the strong – clearly not physical strength alone, intelligence, charisma, perhaps technical organization – all constitute qualities of the strong today. Technics are merely tactics of living in struggle which is identical with life itself.
I rambled a bit but I think there’s some things to discuss.
R: 107 / I: 138 /
The Coming Family-State
>tfw you realize that "family values" fags are correct but that they don't realize that capitalism and feminism is destroying the family-structure
The strengthening of the family is essential for the future. Effective familial relations are the root of both community and state. The family's are the ultimate source and ground of the political order. Atomized individuals and broken families are symptoms of a sick and degenerating society. The society has grown top-heavy. The individual finds face-to-face with the state with no intermediary associations. This too is unnatural. A truly strong state needs strong families, strong local communities and finally a strong and capable national leadership. The weakness of any of the three above is harmful for the others.
How can the family be strengthened in future fascist societies? I think inculcating the people with Confucian-like ideas of role ethics, guidelines for conduct drawn from concrete familial and social roles would be one helpful educational policy, but the real problem is that Whites are totally spooked on the idea of the abstract autonomous individual, abstract universal principles and the idea of the state as something that restricts them.
R: 272 / I: 78 /
/sig/ - Self Improvement General
The quote attached to my post is apparently a fake quote, but the spirit of it ring true to my ear. A healthy body and a healthy mind are key components of fascist living and a perfect balance shall be a key component of any fascist resurgence to come just as it was in the Third Reich and other societies.
>Convict Conditioning (Calisthenics)
>Sun and Steel by Yukio Mishima
R: 399 / I: 147 /
Brenton Tarrant Thread
Post news about Brenton Tarrant, as well as memes, images and general discussion.
R: 343 / I: 122 /
>twitter posting thread
What the title says. Post whatever twitter stuff you find that's relevant and/or interesting.
R: 3 / I: 0 /
Is the Jewish weaponizing of freedom one of the most destructive tools in their arsenal? It seems to me that the idea of freedom as a mere absence of external restraints is the perfect tool to atomize societies and break down all norms, and to let the populace become enslaved to pornography, consumption, drugs and other sorts of vices, allegedly of their own free will (lol).
Freedom from internal restraints is arguably more important. Society is not founded on indulgence and freedom, but on order, discipline and submission. Freedom-lovers should go live with savages if they hate restraints and expectations so much. At the end of the day though, the freedom from restraints can only be maintained through power or might, and to internally free is the only way to externally free in any meaningful way.
Anyway, how do you deal with Burgers who are obsessed with freedom to an excessive degree? I run into them a lot in real life
R: 204 / I: 106 /
Race War General - /rwg/
This thread for the discussion of pro-white resistance, past or present, from an onlookers perspective, especially focused on people such as Anders Behring Breivik, Brenton Tarrant and the various copycats that we've seen since March 2019. Are they doing what has to be done? Is it more harmful than helpful? Are they all false flags? Discuss!
Memes should go here: >>858
>The Breivik Archive
R: 6 / I: 28 /
A wallpaper thread because why not?
R: 325 / I: 94 /
Christian Fascist Thread
Am I the only Christian here?
R: 36 / I: 7 /
Is this board active enough to have real discussions about politics?
Does this board allow a broad range of political opinions or if the mod disagrees with you you are getting banned?
Looking for somewhere to talk about current events, but the mods on tvch.moe are just ban happy and delete your posts if they disagree with you. Its getting to the point where you can't even use the website.
R: 47 / I: 10 /
Cosmotheism: Wave of the Future
This thread is for the discussion of Cosmotheism, the religious philosophy of Dr. William Luther Pierce. To sum it up as simply as possible, Cosmotheism is a form of evolutionary pantheism. The Universe—identified with God—is no static entity, it is dynamic and evolving. This evolution is not directionless and random, it is purposeful, evolving towards the self-actualization and self-perfection of the Whole, i.e. the Universe. This is the purpose of the Universe, as well as the Purpose of each and every constituent Part of the Universe, humans included. The Urge towards higher and higher forms of consciousness, higher and higher forms of complexity, has resulted in the emergence of life from inorganic matter and the evolution from unicellular life to complex multicellular lifeforms. The immanent consciousness of the Cosmos is more evolved in some places than others, this is the result of the blind groping and trial-and-error process undertaken over millions of years here on Earth. The crowning achievement of this—so far—is the Aryan man, who stands at the threshold between subhuman and superhuman. Given that the Purpose of the Universe is an upward path towards higher and higher forms, it is incumbent upon us to genetically isolate the White races from lower humanity and to work at the perfection of our people in concert with the purpose of the Whole, creating in time a Higher Man. And this Higher Man is not merely an end in himself, but a step, just as man was a step, a step towards an even higher man, extrapolated out into infinity towards a state that can only be described as godhood.
READING AND WATCHING LIST
The Cosmotheism Trilogy:
Our Purpose (Pierce clip)
The Meaning of Life (Pierce clip)
The Cosmotheist-esque Sentiments of Savitri Devi
THE COSMOTHEIST CREED
There is but one reality.
That reality is the Whole.
It is the Creator, the self-created.
I am of the Whole.
I am of the Creator, of the self-created.
My purpose is the Creator’s purpose.
My path is the path of the Creator’s self-realization.
My path is the path of divine consciousness.
My destiny is godhood.
R: 45 / I: 4 /
Fascist Misconceptions and Errors
What do you think are the biggest misconceptions or falsehoods commonly spread about fascism even among those who claim to fascists themselves? We all know what normalfags think (or don't, more accurately), but it could be interesting to learn where even people here often go wrong with fascism or the third position (in a broad sense).
One thing that I have noticed is that liberal and individualistic attitudes die hard. Even here on /fascist/ I occasionally see individualists in denial, or those who whine about how a certain measure would be "totalitarian", when of course in reality we are openly and proudly totalitarian as fascists. It is definitely hard to outgrow the liberal and individualistic assumptions pushed into our brains since birth.
R: 69 / I: 22 /
Golden Dawn Thread
TOMORROW IS THE VERDICT FOR 68 MEMBERS OF THE GOLDEN DAWN ON MURDER AND RACKETEERING CHARGES
>In proceedings both dramatic and banal, 68 people, including the party’s entire leadership, have faced charges of operating a criminal organisation while at the same time posing as a political group. Police officers who allegedly supported the far-right party are among those in the dock.
>The accusations have been vigorously denied. Only Giorgos Roupakias, a Golden Dawn operative, has confessed to the stabbing of Pavlos Fyssas, a popular anti-fascist rapper whose death triggered the group’s unravelling.
>MPs who represented the xenophobic bloc until its electoral defeat in July 2019 are accused of attempted murder, possession of weapons and employing violence to eradicate perceived enemies. Like Nikolaos Michaloliakos, a Holocaust denier who founded the neo-Nazi movement in the early 80s, they claim to be victims of political persecution.
>Yet nearly five and a half years after the trial began, Athens’ normally divided political class is united in the belief that this week’s decision will be as cathartic as it is decisive. Writing in Saturday’s Syntakton newspaper, leaders from across the spectrum rejoiced in “the end of Golden Dawn”.
>The verdict is expected to be the denouement of Golden Dawn’s terminal decline. Riven by feuds, defections and factional infighting, the group has all but collapsed since narrowly failing to cross the 3% threshold into parliament in 2019. Yet no country in modern Europe has come as close to an overtly Nazi group strutting the national stage.
R: 179 / I: 330 /
A E S T H E T I C S . T H R E A D
For the discussion, sharing, development, nurturing and use of A E S T H E T I C S
R: 32 / I: 12 /
All-purpose anti-wrong ontology/metaphysics/history views thread
It's about time we had one.
In this thread, we take on wrong or misguided views when it comes to ontology and metaphysics and history. Examples of such:
>"Materialism" as peddled by your Dan Dennetts and your Richard Dawks with it being framed in opposition to "idealism
>The notion of there being "separate, floating, atomized, souls/brains" as opposed to something like Plotinus' teachings.
>The Big Bang and other cases of stealth Abrahamic metaphysics
And so on. Any and all info or sources is acceptable.
R: 55 / I: 39 /
>inb4 there's already one thread about this
But I think this time we should do one with a focus on topics like tutorials for basic things like political bracelets, best color combinations for uniforms, materials for uniforms, haircut styles according to the shape of the face and a long etcetera.
R: 86 / I: 23 /
Political Evolution Thread
How long have you considered yourself some sort of fascist? How did you get to this point? It's interesting to hear the stories of different anons, because while there are often some broad similarities, every story is unique.
R: 212 / I: 88 /
Ecofascism, Tech Critical
R: 418 / I: 164 /
News cyclical: >>10910
Since this clown-show doesn't look like it will fade away anytime in the immediate future, it's worth having a thread to cover the happenings here surrounding BLM and other similar events.
Last thread: >>816
R: 61 / I: 26 /
I know we have a thread on propaganda in general, but I think this is at least worth its own thread for visibility reasons alone. How can we spread awareness of fascism, National Socialism and related doctrines either online or through other means while maybe also advertising this board?
I've been thinking that it could do us good if we attempted to produce various forms of content such as infographs, flyers, pamplhets and other forms of media — as long as they look appealing to the eye and are well-made and informative. With all of the shit going on recently I've been energized to do something, so I figured that it might be good to start from a small and manageable project as a board for those interested.
If anyone has good tutorials for gimp, photoshop and the like on producing infographs or posters or whatever else could be useful to anons, post it ITT. I'm sure if we put our minds to it we could make some neat stuff.
R: 42 / I: 8 /
How will Fascism or National Socialism fix relations between men and women? Is there any fixing what has happened, or is it largely a case of removing the muddlers and the natural relations will restore themselves as a matter of course?
What is essential:
>ensuring a father can support an entire family, getting women out of the work-force
>encouraging and supporting large families through incentives, loans, etc
>encouraging men and women to marry earlier
>making divorce more difficult
R: 17 / I: 6 /
What should the government policy towards raising children be? Where does the responsibility lie on raising children in the fascist ethno-state, on the parents or the state? What would you change about the education system? When is someone considered an adult and no longer a child? What is a marriageable age/age of consent for sexual activity? What rights should children have at all, if any?
I would like to see less dependence on government schooling and more emphasis on parental responsibility on producing healthy children. Raising unfit children should be considered child abuse/neglect. i think that children are taken from their parents too early and they stay in school for too long, and that not every child needs higher education.
R: 34 / I: 6 /
Ethnoglobe is Likely Inevitable in a Pro-White Future (and that's a good thing)
Ethnoglobe became inevitable by 1900 at the latest. The superiority of Western Europe and North America in the second half of the 19th century in economic, military, financial and political spheres was based on our monopoly of industry. The rest of the world absorbed the products of the White world, not producing themselves. Colonies were founded for resources and new markets. Production usually remained situated in the White world.
Then began the dissemination of industry, motivated by greed for greater profits by bringing the production to the area of marketing. Secrets, processes, methods, engineers, managers, etc all given to non-Whites. Within thirty years of Japan modernizing from its feudal state, they had a defeated a European power in battle, Russia, something which shocked the world.
Non-whites, unaccustomed to the comparative luxury of the White world, worked for low wages, bringing their rising industrial might into fierce competition with non-Whites. Gradually, gradually, the center of gravity of production shifted into non-White hands, becoming the weapon of the exploited world against the White industrial core.
While all of this was happening the population explosion continued unabated, propped up by artificial grain surpluses and modern medical technology, all given to non-whites by the benevolent and foolish White man. They, with the collaboration of greedy capitalists and jews, shattered the power of the White world and helped balloon their numbers hundreds of times larger than was naturally permitted by Nature. Non-whites, brainwashed by materialistic thinking and looking for better lives, were drawn to the West, which badly needed labor after WWII. They begin to settle, invited by the victorious Jews and the Allies.
The great replacement begins, and the enormous growth of the population is the chief cause of the impending collapse. Bearing millions of useless bodies permanently is unsustainable, especially at Western standards. With the coming of modern technology, whether this be in regards to communication, transportation, etc the world has become a smaller place, and shitskins are able to come into our lands (where they can live wasteful and unsustainable consumerist lifestyles too!), build (but not innovate) their industrial power, nuclear weapons, destroy the environment, etc. Racial struggle is the driving force in history, not class. In a given multiracial and multicultural environment there is always a struggle for dominance, whether open or hidden, violent or peaceful. The locus of struggle has become truly global in scale. The situation is unsustainable. Ethnoglobe is the only option.
"What to do, when a ship carrying a hundred passengers suddenly capsizes and only one lifeboat, with room for only ten people, has been launched? When the lifeboat is full, those who hate life will try to load it with more people and sink the lot. Those who love and respect life will take the ship's axe and sever the extra hands that cling to the sides of the boat."
R: 36 / I: 9 /
What do you think about many socialist and ex-socialist states are being so hardcore conservative not like the western sjw lunatic fags being so dumb and degenerate specially many reddit and twitter leftists.
Like we have the example like about the eastern Europe where homosexuality is hated among all. And homosexuality doesn't exist in north korea.
And why do internet tankies larp harder about sjw shits even they would have sent to 5 yrs of hard labor for homosexuality>
R: 14 / I: 17 /
Italian Fascism Thread
ITT: Discuss Fascist Italy, post books, pics, videos and more!
When I really think about it, I realize that my knowledge of Fascist Italy is truly embarrassing, not to mention that /fascist/ doesn't seem to talk about it much, so it seems like a good topic for a thread.
R: 10 / I: 1 /
What are the /fascist/ thoughts on genetic engineering.
1. What are your main thoughts about genetic engineering?
2. What is the main difference between genetic engineering and eugenics?
The second question is actually more important than the first because I couldn't give a coherent answer to myself.
R: 12 / I: 3 /
You don't need a tradwife
What do you need is a loyal woman of the same race that is willing to have a decent number of children (4+).
If you want a 'trad' lifestyle, then become Christian, have values and fundaments, have a decent source of income (like a having a business). The unique thing that you need for this it is a Large house for a family of the desired number, things like food or diapers, the clothes can be passed from the older siblings to younger ones.
If you want a 'varg trad' lifestyle then buy a land and make a farm.
Homeschooling is recommendable, but also is Religious/Military education.
>Thing that you must NOT do
>Send kids to laic schools
>Send kids to universities
>Buy your kids things like Phones or Computers
>Living in degenerate places like states where the democrats are mainstream or there's (((LGBT))) parades
STOP LARPING AND MAKE THE DIFFERENCE, IMPROVE YOURSELF
(and if you ask, yeah, i copypasted this from my 4chan thread)
R: 7 / I: 0 /
Fascism and National Socialism
To what extent are they truly different? I have recently realized that I hold two views simultaneously which are potentially contradictory - namely that, like Mosley said, Fascism (which he also called National Socialism) is a name for a movement with similar characteristics that takes on slightly differing forms depending on where exactly it springs up according to different local cultures, racial differences and political situations.
While I agree with this and often cite this definition, I can't help but feel that National Socialism is simultaneously much more, given the fact that it bases itself in applying racial and evolutionary science, preventing the degeneration of a people and in general looking to Nature for guidance. This is why some National Socialists like Savitri Devi have said that National Socialism cannot be reduced to just another "ism".
To try to reconcile these, it can definitely be said that there is much overlap between Fascism as a general term for a political ideology, and then National Socialism, which in many ways goes beyond the political. National Socialism is almost religious if one takes it to its extreme, while we never see the same with Fascism. Either way, I'd be curious to read other anons' thoughts on the matter, whether they are just plain Third Postionists or NatSoc
R: 90 / I: 42 /
/fascist/ for the Infinity Cup 2020!
I don't recall if I asked you yet, but would you be interested in joining us for the Infinity Cup 2020? All you've gotta do to enter is:
1) Create a thread on https://anon.cafe/icup/
with your team
2) Create a logo and at least one kit
3) Just join the fun when the cup starts!
R: 78 / I: 100 /
Fascist Architecture General
What architectural style does /fascist/ prefer, ornate classical architecture, or the more austere "stripped classicism" favored by Speer?
R: 15 / I: 5 /
Can Fascism/National Socialism have a militia or armed populace?
Not a lolbert faggot, but I don't know everything about NS/Fascism, obviously by the title.
Obviously Hitler was pro-gun, however I think it was limited to party members. My main concern would be, what is keeping such an authoritarian regime from being corrupt once the dictator dies and is succeeded? If this were to happen, wouldn't it be necessary to go full Murrica on the guy? Please share your thoughts, I think this is an interestijg question.
R: 114 / I: 33 /
It's no secret that eventually we will come across actual leftists with an interest in real class warfare instead of pseudo socialist radlibs with retarded notions of opposing a system that supports them wholeheartedly. It's important that we convert them and add their revolutionary spirit to the fold. Convince them of the ills of such materialist ideology and if failing that convince them of the merits of the third position and the standard of living it would bring to millions of lives. Avoid faggots like Vaush and if you were a leftist before converting posting ideas itt palatable to our unawakened comrades would be greatlty appreciated.
R: 9 / I: 2 /
R: 12 / I: 7 /
Women in Politics
Why didn't any of you fuckers tell me a woman this cute existed and she shared some of my values?
Anyways, this gets me on an interesting topic. In an idealized state, would women be allowed anywhere near politics? If you want my opinion, I'd say no since I understand how politics usually end when women get involved (a sex that focuses more on emotion rather than empirical/objective logic); however, I often hear the counter-argument that such a perspective is akin to how Mudslimes treat their women.
I don't want women to be forced to wear full hijabs but I do want them to be forced to dress modestly. The problem is that I don't know how this can be enforced legally. From the victorian era, if I remember correctly, women dressed how they did because of their husbands/fathers, rather than the state actually having anything in place. Forcing women out of politics could potentially be something that can be enforced legally - if someone sees a potential downside please let me know, I could be overlooking it - but other rules like how women should dress or behave may be best left to their parents. First, of course, men and women alike would need to be instilled the values of modesty for this to ever really be enforced in a family hierarchy, and for that I think religion would need to be a stressed virtue - particularly Christianity. We could get into how difficult nourishing religion widely in society would be in a different thread. The scope of this one is to discuss where women should sit in matters of politics
R: 506 / I: 160 /
Indo-European Religion / Paganism Thread