With the power of baka-trips, I summon the history thread! Concerning Tales Olde and Antiquated of Ye Singuler Creature known as a "Cuckqueane" We know that cuckqueaning is older than any of us and that from time to time, we have been mentioned in writing whether fictional or factual. Cuckqueaning throughout history thread! First, some old smut. In the Bibliography of Forbidden Books, Volume 3, I found this little gem: >I cannot better terminate this bibliographical attempt, in which English fiction so largely figures, than by noticing two tales which reach me as these pages are passing through the press: Abishag; a Luscious Tale of a Successful Physiological Search after Rejuvenescence, Fully disclosing the Secret of the only natural and true Elixer capable of effecting such a desirable necessity. By David II. Jerusalem 1851. >This is a husband's confession of infidelity to his wife, and the Elixer for rejuvenescence, promised on the title-page, is nothing more than the contact of a young girl. Taking the episode of David and Abishag for his text, the narrator tells us how, tiring of his wife six months after marriage, he has connection with Jemima, his servant maid, and continues the intimacy for two years, until she gets a husband. As he grows older his power of satisfying his wife diminishes, until he seduces Jemima's successor, "a young orphan girl of about eighteen, who has never been in service before," and finds himself in a position to serve both mistress and maid. His wife compliments him on his return of vigour, and enquires the cause, which, after some hesitation, he discloses. His partner expresses surprise that such girls can have so much influence, but, being an accommodating woman, she determined to keep the secret, and to profit by the discovery. On Polly's departure to wed "a particularly well hung young butcher," she engages another docile maid, "always making a change every three months or so, as fresh girls are most effective." >The idea of a wife condoning, and even profiting by her husband's libertinism, if not strictly new, is at any rate not hackneyed, and a more thorough, less flimsy treatment than in the volume before us might have secured an attractive narrative. Only one copy is known to exist and is in a private collection. http://www.eroticabibliophile.com/publishers_carrington_a_d.php mentions the original copy of Abishag is >Pamphlet. 36 pages. Burnt-umber colored wrappers with decorative frame. Title page printed in black only. Also the page mentions that it was >privately printed for a small number of Amateurs and Bibliophiles So… >self-published >individual works initially in booklets with compilations having sturdier work >small, limited runs >created with the explicit intention of sharing work among like-minded people >mainly concerned with the erotic This is the Victorian equivalent of fucking doujinshi.