>Does this count as backpack cucking?
Traditional depictions of backpack cucking encloses the cuck within a backpack worn by the cucker. Transforming this into backpack cuckqueaning seems straightforward: Place the quean in the backpack and then put the backpack on her man or the vixen. But that isn't what's happening here - the man has not merely been moved to a new position but has also become the backpack itself, so we have no choice but to dig deeper. To solve this problem we must steel ourselves and seek to not only at backpack cucking, but to understand
Let's start by breaking backpack cucking down into four parts: The backpack itself (fetish object), the cuck being packed within the backpack (fetishist position), the backpack's being worn by the other two (linking usage), and the cucking (activity). Adjusting each of these and asking ourselves "does this feel like backpack cucking?" carries us closer to its mysteries. To a long, sad, introspective shower also, perhaps.
First Gate: The Cucking-Backpack
"What? How can backpack cucking be backpack cucking without a backpack?"
you ask. Not so fast! There's an argument to be made that backpack cucking is a subset of a larger fetish involving worn containers - one might imagine "saddlebag cucking" involving a centauride, for example, or "slung burlap sack cucking", which is both simpler and scratchier.
However, nowhere in the canon do we see any mention of bindles, satchels, messenger bags, duffel bags (popular in other types of containment/carrying play), suitcases, or any other kind of human-borne container. Backpack cuck even mentions enjoying a backpack TF fetish story in absence of any other element:
>I once saw a /d/ story about a girl slowly turning into a backpack that did it for me.
This suggests that backpacks are the exclusive fetish object in orthodox backpack cucking.
Second Gate: The Packed Cuck
If we remove the cuck from the backpack and place them on the sidelines where they can watch the backpack bounce, are they still being backpack cucked? Everything's still present and accounted for, isn't it?
Consider that backpack cuck testified that being packed held a strong attraction all its own:
>I am currently starving myself and trying to do yoga so I will lose weight and fit in [a backpack], and plan on placing the backpack in the middle of the city and just letting the wind take me when I eventually fit in one. / The only thing keeping me from doing that is if some drug addict takes it and knifes me up, I don't want that to happen.
>Might hire a hooker who's strong enough to carry me to do it.
For the same reason, an orthodox position must reject the idea that anyone but the cuck be packed. Even if one strategically cuts holes in the pack that permit the cucking to be effected, this is something other than backpack cucking. By way of intuitive example, I ask you to imagine watching your man ruck– sorry, fuck
a backpack-packed vixen or a vixen riding what your backpack-packed man packs (whether you bear those packs or not) and determine whether you would feel yourself backpack cucked by either.
Third Gate: The Pack-Bearing Cucker
Traditional illuminations have the penetrating cucker bear the backpack, so it's not well known that backpack cuck specified that either could, and indeed would, carry his load:
>Also I plan on writing a fetish story about a man stuck in a backpack being carried around while his best friend fucks his girlfriend while he's on (sic) it. Also theres (sic) a scene where his girlfriend carries him while he's on her back and gets fucked in a gangbang.
But for our purpose, considering who bears the cuck is less illustrative than considering a cuck who is not borne at all. Consider whether the backpack cuck is still being backpack cucked in a scenario where the cuck-pack is cast aside during the act. Cucked, yes. Packed, even backpacked, definitely. But... backpack cucked? We draw ever-closer to the mystery.
Fourth Gate: The Backpack Cucking
To us, backpack cucking is so immense a question that we can consider nothing else while it occupies us, but did you know that backpack cucking was but one facet of backpack cuck's testament?
>I'd even be fine with a gay couple banging, as long as I'm inside the backpack while they are getting it on and wearing backpacks with me in it
Meditate for a moment upon the fact that backpack cuck could be be in one and both gay backpacks at the same time - for where two or more are gathered together and banging, I am in their backpacks
- and realise that although we know him as backpack cuck because he showed us backpack cucking, he has already passed beyond it. No matter how we struggle to unpack backpack cucking, the victory we strive for therein is only the first of many.
>Does this count as backpack cucking?
Baikapaika baikapaika borna vismaya paikiṃga jāgaraṇa svāhā!