>>5806
1. Saying "Yeah that place looks really retarded" does not preclude you having been there or, to similar places before.
2. You could have seen other threads or discussions like those before, despite having never before been to that particular domain.
3. If it's taste and not anything else, then you could still say *why* something is preferable to you over something else.
>cock or GTFO
Fine, fine. But if you're easily trigger-baited, then it becomes not even fun to play games domming you because you just get earache for it. So you'll be forced to settle for a lower value male like me, you know, if you don't fix it or work on yourself. Also, learn to cook and I'll do aaanything for you my love please punish my balls later ok
>>5808
Even if that is a hive of crowing celibate involuntarys, are you sure you're not just looking for validation for the fetish you have? Which would be silly, seeing as it says in the bible (the book on which your society and culture is no doubt based on) that it is fine, though not preferred, for multiple women to marry the same man. Abrahamic law does not condemn it as something prone to undermining society. You'd need modern feminism to make that argument. You'd then need to decide which one gives you satisfaction, which would be no doubt verboten to talk about on the cuckquean board.
I'll stop playing games now because it's not my clubhouse. I've enjoyed it though. Thanks for being such a good girl it's been fun to join in.