>>4536
Huh. That's new. I know SBH when I see it, but this is... a kind of censorship-denial? Interesting. Usually if you're going to try and humiliate the viewer for having itty bitty titties, you'd show them what they don't have, really rub it in, but here the censorship itself seems to be the point, like a... mosaic fetish?
—okay, I looked it up. It's a thing, and it seems to be closely related to some truly skin-crawling stuff, judging by a few of the really,
really hardcore self-destructive conditioning attempts I saw targeted at male viewers.
Most of the censor-fetish things I flicked through seemed quite open about what they're looking to do, though I did see a few that used ambush, subliminal, and other consent-bypassing techniques, which gave me an attack of the usual nausea I always get from catching them at work. They're the same hypnotic, subliminal, and involuntarily-persuasive techniques that I glimpsed the interracial and cuckolding people routinely use years ago, which had become truly sickening in the degree they sought to bypass consent. I suspect a few of their number may have had professional training, and that knowledge transferred through the "community". Not a fun thing to consider.
Anyway, these are thankfully much nicer. I like how in the first one those thinner black bar and heart censors have been made into a symbol of humiliating titlessness at the same time as the basic idea that the viewer's assets are dirty and in need of hiding sinks in. Do we have any SBH-loving anons for whom these do something? As someone who's written a few of the captions in this thread, I'm interested.