I happened to discover archives for all 5 of the 8chan Star vs threads. May be useful since all the images and some of the threads on 8chan/8kun are now dead. https://archive.ph/hvCBb https://archive.ph/QxvW5 https://archive.ph/VD9pS https://archive.ph/yUINn https://archive.ph/ypojn The threads just have thumbnails but it should be easy to find the original images using a reverse image search. Or if not, you could try searching for the original file name elsewhere (i.e. on desuarchive, in case it was posted on 4chan). You can also find most if not all other 8chan cuckquean threads here: https://archive.ph/http://8ch.net/cuckquean* You should be able to find images from those threads using similar methods.

The pilot just leaked: https://files.catbox.moe/6iur52.mp4 Mostly not on topic but at one point (around 3:10) Star's teacher asks "How'd you like it if your man left you for an older woman?" and Star chews suggestively on her wand as she thinks about it.

I hate that the archive boards are only thumbnails. Can't find original pieces anymore. Gotta settle with what I got, unless someone here has a secret archive.

There's some nice stuff from this artist, SaltyXodium. https://e-hentai.org/g/2520394/1651f576c1/

>>4874 Random male anon that somehow ended up here. I wouldnt feel comfortable doing it, but i wouldnt shit can my girl immediately (if i had one) for bringing it up. I would just find it weird. i dont want other women, hence why im with her and not them. Going balls deep in some other girl would make me feel like a creep. God help me if she ends up regretting it and weve shitted up our relationship. I'd feel horrible. >Now if she asks to fuck other guys im out on the spot.

OP hasn't said if she actually want to fuck other guys or not, because if she do...Well, I guess the alarm is correct :/ But yea, a lot of guys seems to have a huge amount of suspicion about this due to the past experience and/or other guy's bad experience, its not some made up thing, so tread with care.

>>4871 ^This. Make it perfectly clear that in you know way intend an open "relationship" or MFM sex EVER (unless the other male is a very passable trap and you only get to watch or something if that's among your things). >>5208 Look, I'm all for religion's regulatory social role but this kind of attitude is that has perverted the near entirety of your clergy into homosexuals crypto-marxist revisionists and turned most of your flock to either deleterious unreligiosity or Islam. If you are not Eastern Orthodox you do not even approach the position to be smug about your biblicality.

>>4870 he thinks it is a trap

>>5231 I'm sorry OP, these are waters that are hard for anyone to navigate and my heart goes out to you.

>>5030 Wait, no, cancel that, I opened the mini-portal a few months too far back! Here's the version that actually ran a few months later. Originally posted in the fantasy cuckqueaning thread at >>5050

>>5051 Can’t say I understand it Don’t know if I enjoy it Or who it’s even for But I sure ain’t never seen anything like it And that makes it OC This board man This board

>>5191 Wouldn't have it any other way tbh.

>>5191 >Can’t say I understand it As opposed to the rest of this thread? I don't think it's that weird, apart from the whole turning it into an alt-reality advertisement thing (does it count as a fancy caption?), but then my sense of normality is not so much warped as corkscrewing.

>>5137 Thanks, doc! It's a shame that the drawfag who first colored Cuckquean-tan randomly chose bright yellow with blue trim of all schemes. Tried to commission a proper reference sheet for her back in the 8chan days, but it never worked out.

>>5140 >bright yellow with blue trim of all schemes What kind of scheme do you think you would have preferred? I feel like there's a certain dorkiness to her color scheme that's appropriate for her.

>>5143 Speaking of >>5137 I absolutely love how her hair's been done, likewise her cute antlers and Deedlit-hueg elf ears. Very appropriate. >a certain dorkiness to her color scheme that's appropriate for her. You're right, though that particular combination's brightness ended up making her look like she's wearing a well-worn highlighter, at least to my eyes. Were I tweaking her existing colors, I'd probably pull the main yellow down a notch to make it more fabric than fluorescent. I'd color the trim to match or make it white like a Fifties day dress, which I think is what she's supposed to be wearing under her apron. You can see in pics related that that means the collar and cuffs need to be thicker to hold their own, which helps to balance things when only her upper half is visible. On its own that could be a little frumpy, so adding a little Forties pinup spice might help loosen things up. Her leather choker and wristbands helped with that. I'm no illustrator so all these ideas might be dead ends, though. Hard to tell what works well without thumbnailing it out.

>>4536 Huh. That's new. I know SBH when I see it, but this is... a kind of censorship-denial? Interesting. Usually if you're going to try and humiliate the viewer for having itty bitty titties, you'd show them what they don't have, really rub it in, but here the censorship itself seems to be the point, like a... mosaic fetish? —okay, I looked it up. It's a thing, and it seems to be closely related to some truly skin-crawling stuff, judging by a few of the really, really hardcore self-destructive conditioning attempts I saw targeted at male viewers. Most of the censor-fetish things I flicked through seemed quite open about what they're looking to do, though I did see a few that used ambush, subliminal, and other consent-bypassing techniques, which gave me an attack of the usual nausea I always get from catching them at work. They're the same hypnotic, subliminal, and involuntarily-persuasive techniques that I glimpsed the interracial and cuckolding people routinely use years ago, which had become truly sickening in the degree they sought to bypass consent. I suspect a few of their number may have had professional training, and that knowledge transferred through the "community". Not a fun thing to consider. Anyway, these are thankfully much nicer. I like how in the first one those thinner black bar and heart censors have been made into a symbol of humiliating titlessness at the same time as the basic idea that the viewer's assets are dirty and in need of hiding sinks in. Do we have any SBH-loving anons for whom these do something? As someone who's written a few of the captions in this thread, I'm interested.

>>2921 You may also appreciate these other two I requested around that time and one I have that is related. I'm a bit rusty with what's all hood in the good over here since the last time I saw a /cuckquean/ was before any bunker.

I experimented.

>>4954 Neither! I like cooperative dynamics the most. The vixen and I are there for the same reason and I'm already being dominated by my man, after all. Lots of queans like being dominated by the vixen though; more power to them. If I had to choose one or the other, I could probably be coaxed into dominating the vixen in limited ways, like helping to pin her from behind if she wanted to struggle or smothering her face in my tits if she wanted some SBH, but for me it would be less about dominating her than helping her pussy wetter for my man's benefit. I'm kind of single-minded in that respect.

Is this true?

Ladies, what would you do if Giovanna showed up out of nowhere, defeated your man in single combat, then took him home for a victory fuck? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Y9FGfZbSEuY

>>4960 not even fucking close

>>5079 I've wondered if any of the girls here have been bullies themselves, but it feels really doubtful with how all the regulars of the board seem to be cuckqueans rather than vixens.

>>4504 >>4511 >>4556 Tell you what, this all hits harder now that I’ve seen for myself what the blacked grooming threads on 4chan get up to. The stuff slipped into OEA is exactly the sort of thing they celebrate and discuss spreading; the subtler and more insidious it is the more they gloat. Truly >>4713 was right: >Awareness and knowledge is pretty much the best way to prevent weirdos from getting their claws into your psyche. I just wish Sierra Lee hadn't turned out to be one of those. What a disappointment.

Title screen

>>5020 Can you stop already Nobody fucking cares

>>5022 Yeah, fuck your waste of perfectly good dubs. This is an imageboard, not Reddit—we're not fishing for upcummies here. Wouldn't care if I was the only one to notice this, don't care if it's cringe or schitzo to point it out. It is creepy, it does match the downright sinister and destructive shit I saw happening elsewhere, and it was a disappointing and disgusting thing for someone to do... and I've seen some shit. Polite sage for off-topic.

>>4778 >gif nostagia! still sometimes sing that one potato song to myself outta nowhere https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKbJLCZsIOA

>>4800 >I'm glad you have the kind of trust based relationship that allows both of you to be yourselves. At the end of the day that story wasn't really important. Please accept my apologies, Anon—I didn't mean to boast. >But I also have to face the fact that underneath all of that in a deeper desire to feel valuable, to feel worth defending, to be worth something at all. >Maybe that's why I have both a praise and a humiliation kink, I feel worthless so I want my worth to be affirmed but but it can also feel good to revel, rather than wallow, in my lowness. Sex can be weirdly sensible, can't it? >I feel like the stereotypes are that way for a reason, but what if it's confirmation bias? That's what I was groping at, yeah. I think both things are true: The stereotypes are that way for a reason, and confirmation bias exists. There's no easy answer! My own rule of thumb is to deal with individuals and design for populations. I fuck both up all the time, but then most things in life require my being better than I am. >It comes across like a sugar coating on "get back in the kitchen where you belong" when it could be more about how you can be a woman and a scientist/worker/gamer/whatever and you don't have to sacrifice your femininity to be those things. I have to come at this one from outside, I'm afraid, because I don't really relate: Growing up as a tomboy who liked both "guy things" and "girl things", I never found that to have much impact upon whether I felt myself to be a girl/woman or not. I just like things; the fact of my liking them is neither feminine nor masculine. This is, in part, why I always found the whole GaMuRgUrL thing to be a bit of a beat-up—yes, and?—but that's a whole different subject. The system wants us to care deeply and worry about this for its own reasons, but I personally don't. The medium turns the messages into tar babies: They don't particularly care whether you support them or oppose them because the real (not necessarily conscious) objective of the system that carries them is to have you engage, to agree with the implicit idea that it is part of your life, which in turn makes it true. The trap is in touching them at all. That said, I think it's important to distinguish the parts of messages that seek to control—take (destabilized characteristic of target group), glue (payload), release in direction of (target group), go to lunch—and those that arise from the culture at large doing a little introspection, which we experience as the memetic ferment. That arises from questions far too large and important for treatment in a post like this. My own experience is that it was hammered into me from all around as I grew up, sometimes in very frightening ways, that to fall pregnant was to lose and to learn any home-making skills was to set oneself up for surrender and a lifetime of soul-crushing servitude. As with all conditioning, these messages were not thought but felt. I have only been able to dig up and confront the deeper parts in the past few years and have determined with quiet regret that on the whole it was not a good thing. I'm just lucky that I didn't get the full press.

>>4808 >At the end of the day that story wasn't really important. It was an appropriately related story, and I AM happy that you seem to be in a happy, fulfilling relationship. There isn't anything to apologize for. >My own rule of thumb is to deal with individuals and design for populations. This seems like a good rule of thumb. What matters most is that your intentions are in the right place, and when we miss the mark we can always apologize and use the experience to try to be better in the future. >So when I see home-making and child-rearing cast in these kinds of woo-woo terms, I interpret it as attempts to smuggle these roles past the cultural constructs whose mission was to suppress them This seems plausible to me, it always did come across kinda like it was part of someone's agenda. >By what lights do you think you might dissect them, by the way? Candlelight of course! It's the best for intimate work where you're really getting to know your subject, you know? Cheekiness aside, I'd like to explore more about the characters and their relationships. I didn't get to the part where the sister was an actual person, she was just fap material. I'm interested in seeing if there is any chemistry between her and her sister or her and her husband, enough of something to make the relationships believable. While I often find authorial intent to be a rather boring part of literature, here I would like to know what's going on in the author's head. What are they getting out of this, what are the parts of the story they revel in, what kinds of things are being skipped over? I also enjoy rewriting stories in my head, so it could be fun to read it all the way through to see what's there then play around with trying to make it a better story. You've already done some of that above, so I'd have a starting point. >This is kind of fun! I'm glad you didn't hate it! My fingers are crossed that it will get a good ending, I have read a few other stories that seemed like they were leading up to a nice sisterwife harem ending but then they took a hard right and didn't deliver. Though I'd rather have have a wimpy ending than a shift to a squick like cuckhold.

>>4822 Looking forward to your analysis then, Anon.

>>4800 >>4808 >Dark Whispers The author Tessaly came out as a MtF tranny who styles himself a lesbian hypnodomme. Whether that’s relevant is up to you.

Bump for history.

According to Socrates of Constantinople, the Roman emperor Valentinian the Great practiced polygamy, defying Roman law and Christian tradition to marry a woman named Justina after his first wife Marina Severa saw her in the bath and talked his ear off about how beautiful she was. Nobody knows for sure whether this account is true, but if it is, it's fairly easy to interpret Marina as bisexual, a cuck, or both.

>>4810 >Justina being thus bereft of her father, still continued a virgin. Some time after she became known to Severa, wife of the emperor Valentinian, and had frequent intercourse with the empress, until their intimacy at length grew to such an extent that they were accustomed to bathe together. When Severa saw Justina in the bath she was greatly struck with the beauty of the virgin, and spoke of her to the emperor; saying that the daughter of Justus was so lovely a creature, and possessed of such symmetry of form, that she herself, though a woman, was altogether charmed with her. The emperor, treasuring this description by his wife in his own mind, considered with himself how he could espouse Justina, without repudiating Severa, as she had borne him Gratian, whom he had created Augustus a little while before. He accordingly framed a law, and caused it to be published throughout all the cities, by which any man was permitted to have two lawful wives.

Caroline of Ansbach, wife of George II of Great Britain, seems to have fit the bill of a great historical cuckquean: >George Augustus and Caroline had a successful and loving marriage, *though he continued to keep mistresses, as was customary for the time.[23] Caroline was aware of his infidelities; they were well known and he told her about them himself. His two best-known mistresses were Henrietta Howard, later Countess of Suffolk, and, beginning in 1735, Amalie von Wallmoden, Countess of Yarmouth. Howard was one of Caroline's Women of the Bedchamber and became Mistress of the Robes when her husband inherited a peerage in 1731*; she retired in 1734.[24] In contrast with her mother-in-law and husband, Caroline was known for her marital fidelity; she never made any embarrassing scenes nor did she take lovers.[23] She preferred her husband's mistresses to be her ladies-in-waiting so that she could keep a closer eye on them.[25]

>>4932 Reading an article about her at https://royalcentral.co.uk/features/the-wives-of-the-georgian-kings-caroline-of-ansbach-39011/ and she seemed formidable: >Lucy Worsley has called Caroline of Ansbach "the cleverest queen consort ever to sit on the throne of England". >served as regent on occasion >both intelligent and curious, vastly outshone her husband in most cultural and political aspects. So much so, that when they were crowned King and Queen, a satirist wrote about the royal couple: “You may strut, dapper George but ‘twill all be in vain; We know ‘tis Queen Caroline, not you, that reign.” >Caroline convinced the King to commune the sentence of six prisoners, so that they could be a part of an experiment. She made an attempt to inoculate these prisoners against smallpox, and when they all survived, she tried it again – this time on children. The results were favourable, and Caroline soon had her own children inoculated against the disease. In her own way, she was a pioneer in the field of medicine. The relationship between her and her King seems very sweet, too: >Sophia Charlotte was the sister of the future King George I of England. George had a stormy relationship with his own wife, and didn’t want his son, George Augustus, to go through the same thing. So George Augustus was given the freedom to choose a wife of his liking. He settled upon Caroline when, after having heard good reports of her from his aunt, he visited the court in Ansbach to see his future bride. George Augustus immediately took a liking to Caroline’s good character, and the couple were married in Hanover in 1705. >Almost immediately after [their first son] Frederick’s birth, Caroline came down with smallpox. Her infant son was kept away from her to avoid catching the disease, but George Augustus stayed by her side and subsequently developed smallpox himself. >On her death bed, Caroline urged George to remarry, but the King was devoted to his wife, and refused, saying that he would only ever take mistresses instead. After her death, George said that he had known many women, but none of them were fit to buckle Caroline’s shoe. >True to his word, George II never married again, and when he died, 23 years later, he was buried next to her in a matching coffin, devoted till the end.