>>2765 Owl House

>>2045 Found on twitter with the following text "Art Club President asserts dominance over Nagatoro. Chad Paisen serves the true master."

[CHIBIKKO KINGDOM (Kekocha)] Shiawase Juukon Seikatsu Happy Bigamist Lifestyle - https://nhentai.net/g/405493/ This one gets really good when she tells the new wife to watch and learn. Friendly cuckqueaning is the best.

https://incognitystuff.blogspot.com/p/star-vs-earth.html https://www.patreon.com/incognitymous

>>5817 >...stopped me to di it one more time at each camera we passed. How can something be funny and hot at the same time?

You should feel happy when 2 princesses like your brother. They could have anybody but they chose him. Himesama Gentei! - https://hentaibar.com/videos/1076/himesama-gentei-episode-1-english-subbed/

>>5734 >Giwtm Keeping it within fantasy is alright, but the guy was forgotten politically/militarily and only his mother fucking antics made a Greek footnote >Looks like animals have all the fetishes we humans do Again, outside of the fantasy this was deliberate human action in bringing them together. It takes human imagination the fact that he also gave a seeing to a granddaughter of one of the two on top of it all, so you stretch it to the point where you're giving them internal monologue and making them say "take it all you slut, like the time I made your aunts and uncles". The reality was probably a lot more straightforward. >Did you just come across this stuff Nope. I'd looked with malice aforethought but I've affirmed my religion since and if you're looking to be in that round hole you shouldn't go squaring the peg off. Everything I've said is qualified, because I'm trying to get to where I want to. >celebrate inbrooding I want to be in the free love cult, but for the faithening I've had in JC it pushes back against it

>>5801 >the guy was forgotten politically/militarily and only his mother fucking antics made a Greek footnote I see no problem with that.

>>5814 https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/92122757 https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/93969431

>>5815 >I can feel both of your juices dripping on me. Hnnnnnngkkkh https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/94095841 https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/94183216 https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/94266598

Some scenarios that would make cuckqueaning viable without leading to a beta uprising of virgin men: >war Big wars can wipe out significant portions of the adult male population, meaning that many women are freed up to be vixens. Make these regular occurrences and the M/F ratio will be perpetually skewed enough that queaning just becomes an thing that happens by necessity. Monogamy would still reign supreme and many vixens would be looking to completely steal your man away rather than just get some satisfaction from him. However, your men might be the ones to die and then you have to be a sad vixen. >slavery Some enemy group is defeated, their men put to the sword and their women taken as prizes. Monogamy between your people is still enforced, but no decent man would see those sexy sub-humans as a valid romantic partner so there's really no problem letting him enjoy himself with his property. They're living sex toys that you can send to him whenever you're feeling tired or kinky or just want to watch. And even if she is hotter than you and makes him moan better than you ever could, even if the number of times he comes to you for relief drops off a cliff, you can rest safe in the knowledge that she will never really be a threat to you. However, this situation would only last one generation unless it's a small society with plenty of nearby settlements to raid whenever the supply starts to run dry. >eugenics Men decided they wanted to have harems and control the gender ratio by adopting widespread artificial insemination and selecting mostly female embryos to achieve the perfect ratio. Monogamy would be completely out the window and all men would be expected, or even required, to take the correct number of wives. Cheating outside that group would still be looked down upon, but wouldn't be as big a deal unless it involved taking another man's favorite. And there would be favorites, even if all the wives are equal on paper. Men may have given themselves greater voting power so that they still hold half the say, but even if they didn't, the internal competitions between wives would see them take up his causes to curry favor and move up the internal hierarchy of the marriage. Any ideas of a sisterhood uniting against male authority would fall apart as soon as they realized betraying the group means getting a monopoly on husband cock. However, you can't have impregnating sex without fucking up the ratio unless you also have an abortion fetish. >complete sexual openness Sex is just sex, it doesn't mean anything and everybody can and does do it with everybody just to feel good. If marriages exist at all, they're purely for child rearing with no expectation of fidelity from either partner. However, it doesn't really feel like you're getting cucked and you're expected to sleep around too. >robots Waifubots are created that put fleshbag women to shame: ideal personalities, unwavering loyalty, great at housework of all sorts, impossibly sensuous holes, and fully modular. Once a man has one (or more), you are just completely obsolete to him. Why do women not have husbandobots? Who knows. Maybe their wasn't enough market demand to support their development. Maybe an early model fucked a bunch of girls to death and they got banned. Maybe the robotics industry is run by a secret cabal of cuckqueans. In any case, women as a gender are getting collectively cucked by these things. With so many men completely uninterested in human women, the entirety of the female population have to compete for the men who are either too poor to afford an AI wife or too technophobic to embrace the future. The old systems of monogamy would persist nominally, supported by the picturesque relationships between men and their robots, but in reality it would be a free for all where men have no shortage of options and so much as complaining about his cheating will get you replaced with any of a dozen eager candidates. Learning to share is the only way to keep a man. This scenario also works with genetically engineered catgirls.

>>5621 >Would a matriarchal society lead to a cuckquean heaven? No, it would probably result in human extinction, instead.

>>1331 >What is the best way to establish cuckqueaning in our culture? I think it would get popular quickly if there were some good Cuckquean characters in mainstream media. >What should the average Ratio of men to women be? 1:5 at least. There needs to be so many more women than men that the top 10% doesn't have time for all of them.

>>1331 In a conflict between distant peer nations over regional power, the war itself results in staggeringly high casualties due to use of strategic nuclear weapons, with as many as 1 in 5 men between 18 and 45 killed. On the home front, engineered viruses target specific ethnicities common in the region, resulting in many dead and yet more survivors, mostly women, left infertile. Fought over proxy nations and sea, a peace is reached without serious occupation, allowing the military to demobilise and return its manpower to the civilian sector. Faced with wild gender disparity, many relationships would either form on the basis of sharing their male partner, or adapt to the new conditions based solely on their newfound desirability; it might simply be better to know who your boyfriend/husband is sleeping with on the side, than have women with unknown diseases and motives throwing themselves at him night and day. With so many more women left unable to have children, rather than without a partner, the adoption of one or more fertile female partners into the relationship would certainly become commonplace. Although full-blown polygamous households would be fringe cases, many might bring the mothers and resulting children into their homes, rather than condemn them to being a single mother in post-war recession. Many of the infertile would inevitably come to terms with their new circumstances and form monogamous relationships either dedicated to retaining a single partner or simply not predicated on reproduction. The children left orphaned or in foster care by the war would benefit greatly from the widescale adoption by these couples.

>So I got this new cuckquean plot >Real world girl gets isekaied into a fantasy world with a whole lot of women and far fewer men >She doesn't get a cheat power because she is a useless cuck and women are mostly magic-less goobers in-setting >And the only reason men have autonomy is due to their absurd physical, intellectual, and magical prowess >The cuck gets captured, sold into slavery, then bought by a noble woman due to looking healthier than the rest of the rabble >But the noble didn't just buy the Cuck just because she wanted a menial slave to scrub the floors >Turns out women are useful for something: If a man has sex with a lot of healthy young women, he gets a permanent magic boost and the girls gain temporary access to minor magic. >The magical power of the family patriarch can translate into absurd amounts of political, financial and social power for his house, >And providing better quality girls while making sure hubby enjoys them means more power and status for his girls, in and outside the family. >Hence, Noble lady puts the Cuck through a harsh yet fair 'training regimen' to teach her how to be a proper servant and how to please hubby >Part of this education is watching the young and handsome Lord of the House fuck his wives, his concubines, and his servants >By the time its the Cuck's turn, something odd happens when the lord takes her to pound town >After the deed everything seems normal, until her noble mistress corners her and interrogates her about what she did. >Turns out that fucking the Cuck gave the lord of the house a significant magic boost, significant enough for him to take notice >In fact, every time Cuck has been present for her mistress getting railed, her hubby's magic boost has been better. >Its been enough to improve the Noble lady's position with her sister-wives and she really wants to keep things going >It takes some effort to figure out what is going on, but the mistress theorizes its due a 'sympathetic magic' between the cuck and the couple having sex

>>5800 If you're being literal minded on purpose there, then it's because I expect special treatment. lol XD emoji smileyface Otherwise, it's because I'm not from your group nor the other one that if there's something obviously wrong to you there, then it's something maybe only you would get from being somebody on the inside of here/there. I would not recognise it being as clear cut garbage as was told to me, I haven't seen threads come before it full of infighting or anything else like that. The history and context for it are not things I've seen or would know about.

>>5792 That's CC, a.k.a. fem/r9k/. That's about all I know about them. >>5797 >>5803 How could that anon have history with a site she's seeing for the first time, you absolute gorilla nigger? What's happening here is known as taste. Anyway, cock or GTFO usually applies but since you're underageb@ and/or retarded, your only option is the latter. Off you fuck now.

>>5806 Yeah, did some looking around. It's quite the hive of femcels.

>>5806 1. Saying "Yeah that place looks really retarded" does not preclude you having been there or, to similar places before. 2. You could have seen other threads or discussions like those before, despite having never before been to that particular domain. 3. If it's taste and not anything else, then you could still say *why* something is preferable to you over something else. >cock or GTFO Fine, fine. But if you're easily trigger-baited, then it becomes not even fun to play games domming you because you just get earache for it. So you'll be forced to settle for a lower value male like me, you know, if you don't fix it or work on yourself. Also, learn to cook and I'll do aaanything for you my love please punish my balls later ok >>5808 Even if that is a hive of crowing celibate involuntarys, are you sure you're not just looking for validation for the fetish you have? Which would be silly, seeing as it says in the bible (the book on which your society and culture is no doubt based on) that it is fine, though not preferred, for multiple women to marry the same man. Abrahamic law does not condemn it as something prone to undermining society. You'd need modern feminism to make that argument. You'd then need to decide which one gives you satisfaction, which would be no doubt verboten to talk about on the cuckquean board. I'll stop playing games now because it's not my clubhouse. I've enjoyed it though. Thanks for being such a good girl it's been fun to join in.

>>5809 Even if that is a hive of crowing celibate involuntarys, are you sure you're not just looking for validation for the fetish you have? Which would be silly, seeing as it says in the bible (the book on which your society and culture is no doubt based on) that it is fine, though not preferred, for multiple women to marry the same man. Abrahamic law does not condemn it as something prone to undermining society. You'd need modern feminism to make that argument. You'd then need to decide which one gives you satisfaction, which would be no doubt verboten to talk about on the cuckquean board. Yeah, this is what I mean by it sounding like reddit.

>>5759 >sub Also, not cuckqueaning.

>>5770 She lets her husband "cheat" but I guess because she hates it(does she really?) it doesn't count.

>>5785 Answer's in the sticky at the top of this board: >the fetish of cuckqueaning - an arrangement where a woman enjoys her partner having sex with other women. In real life it is open, consensual and encouraged by the woman - distinguishing it from cheating

what do you cuckqueans do to mitigate fear complex when: not only is the man not prepared to spend the majority of best share resources on you, but that he might decide to give you zeero and drop you like a rock? Does the idea that you're sharing but best in the pack need to be maintained? Or do those that want the worth -less dynamic over them prevail in the community you've got going here?

>>5798 >not only is the man not prepared to spend the majority of best share resources on you >best in the pack I'm not a cuckquean because I'm entangled in fevered evopsych stories of what the grownups are thinking about in the other room, I'm a cuckquean because it is one of my sexual fetishes and watching my man slake his thirsts with another woman is fucking HOT. If you're asking about the fear that one's man might leave one for a vixen, the answer, at least for me, is that I don't have that fear in the first place because of how intimately I know and trust my man. (Some vixens aren't on the same page; we've had one or two who perhaps thought I'd put him up as table stakes they could play for, which was really just more tedious than anything else.) I'd imagine many other cuckqueans are the same. As to the idea of ranking, you'll find that among those who care for it, it depends on the type of cuckqueaning they do - compersive queans often enjoy the top or co-equal spot, some humiliation queans want to be on the bottom of the pile, yet others of both types find themselves preferring some particular combination separately relative to man and vixen.

>>5416 yes. I felt really guilty at the beginning, then I got like really really into it for a few blissful months with zero guilt or anxiety, and then it came back.

>>5458 I find it very hilarious that even Muhammad doesn't allow touching vixens. In fact, in Islam, sex involving more than one man and woman is haram too, so no group sex, and all sex must be under a blanket or cover

I thought the most that the Bible had to say about keeping a harem was that "if you're a preacher then maybe you shouldn't". Women touching or encouraging other women could be a sin too I suppose... in that marriages are meant to be singular, and marriage at that time just meant going into a tent and getting on with the business. So it's implied not to do it. To be honest even if it seemed that much of a sin, which it doesn't, then I'd be asking why God either made or allowed women to be more lesbo gayfag by nature in the first place. And I'd be much more concerned if the women you're screwing are not married to you (in spirit or otherwise) and you are adulterating them through other relationships. You would essentially be encouraging their disloyal nature to be prevalent within them. As for talking to a woman about it, I'm not sure they want a serious talk about it. You leading them to wherever it is they want to go gets their buttons pushed in harder. The closest I've seen to an "upfront woman" is them lifting a BDSM whip and saying "gee I'd HATE to be hit with this one" /sarcasm Women who are direct about it definitely exist but I'd guess they're the odd ones out.

>>5416 You're looking at this from the wrong angle. Monogamy doesn't exist to protect women's feelings, it exists to protect other men from having all the marriageable girls defiled by Chad. As long as the girls you're banging have already taken themselves out of that pool by slutting it up, you can do whatever you want with them without causing any further damage. Assuming you're already fucking her, your girlfriend is cheating on her future husband with you. Why should you treat her better than she treats him?

>>5601 Jesus permitted sin only when intervention would be wrong or when it would have prevented man from learning the lesson through any other way. If anon deems these women capable of learning by any other means then he should discourage their sin, and not be permissive towards it. As for why you should treat a woman better than that woman treats other men, weaker or stronger or whatever they are... Have you seen the way that women generally treat men? They aren't supposed to be the arbiters of human conduct. Making them that was a mistake. The funny thing is, if I'm arguing against reciprocity in absolute, then I still do not know personally when it's being naive or not to leave the fence. I would like to know for my own sake. I've given too much more or too little less before (nearly always too much).

A couple of days late but I just saw this 9/11 meme.

>>1991 >>2191 Just saw this thread on /co/. The first pic is especially striking. I never realized they'd leaned this far in on Barbara Gordon (Batgirl/Oracle) being a willing, enthusiastic cuckquean in the main comics. The last two pics I think were posted back on 8chan way back when but they may be new to some of you. I guess that traumatic moment in the last pic when Starfire opened the door awakened something in her?

>>5753 Is this all real? Especially that 3rd pic. Did her bf really fuck that many women?

https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/622703eab109c070e13de2aa0a8c535d https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/0d5bd3372814b60ff89dd49a891774e1 https://twitter.com/redhornyhead/status/1699042775638192604/video/1

>>5752 The kind of guy who blunders around outside of the male advice thread then flies into salty rage when told to tender the traditional toll probably finds most things difficult, to be fair.

>>5776 I am a gigantic faggot please rape my face.

>>5781 Contrary to what you were taught, women don't have penises.