I spotted this "Wife Quest" on the Playstation store recently. It seems to be a game where monstergirls steal your husband without even the decency to let you watch, and so need to be punished. Looks super-cute although the naughtiness doesn't go beyond some teasing sprites and the quest's conclusion doesn't go where we'd want it to (at least, I think it doesn't). Regardless of whether it can live up to our exacting standards, this is a step in the right direction. I am all for incremental progress on the culture of stories about girls whose bfs/husbands are stolen by monstergirls. >>3454 I had completely forgotten about that one. But I had captured the thread it was from, so here's a copy with italics and bold preserved thanks to the magic of Markdown and >>3452 showing us the way with Ghostbin https://pst.klgrth.io/paste/uvfhwmud The password is frommyheartandfrommyhand (why don't people understand / my intentions?)

>>3453 Anon I stole that first pic from the yuri board with the intent to use it in my next post and you stole it first! Unfair! >Did the conflict arise from snitting over the game itself, or were there pre-existing issues that bubbled to the surface thanks to everyone being around the table? It was game related, and I did my best to mediate but in the end, I think the group was just too big to hold together, it was a 10 person group when most campaigns are balanced for 4-5. Everyone wanted to do something different and I managed to get them to do similar stuff some of the time but eventually things started pulling apart. The varying motivations of the difference player characters led to them having beef with each other which then spilled over into the real world and that just wasn’t fun. I also was really disappointed in myself because of one particular case where I picked up that the only other girl in the party wanted to do something but I hadn’t written anything to even begin to explore that as a possibility (she’d have been blinked to another part of the continent, away from everyone else in the party) so I just rushed through my description in a way that left no time for objections, and she was visibly crestfallen. She didn’t seem upset with me as much as she seemed upset with the other players, but I knowingly let her down. We only had a few more sessions after that, I never really got to make it up to her. >Please don't allow bad tabletop experiences to knock you off it I really do think it’s for the best. I’m ok at the improv needed to make individual sessions fun, but I struggle to write sweeping stories that are engaging in the long term. It’s also just so much pressure having to be part of a group and responsible for everyone else’s fun. Even as a player, if I decide I’m not up to playing on a given day I’m letting other people down and might even lead to the session being canceled. If I want to play a different video game tonight, or read a book, or go for a walk, then there’s nothing stopping me and I won’t let anyone down. It was a fun exercise, and I’m not definitively writing it off, I just won’t seek it out and if I never play again then that is fine by me. >find another way to express it. Which is what we're doing here, I suppose. I used to go back to the old campaign notes for the Skyrim campaign to tweak things and write characters, it was a fun thing to do on the commute to work. I lost all those updated files a few years ago when I lost the flashdrive they were on so I just have the backups now and I just haven’t felt compelled to try to re-create the work. I keep telling myself I’ll find the drive someday, but I know I won’t. It’s long gone now. >This whole thread's cringe anyway: Look at all these fuckin' words. Definitely thought you were going to point out how we’re all cucks and that’s pretty cringe. And I totally embrace the cringe, it’s just who I am! I just also like making fun of myself. >Do try to play it with a controller; I suspect it'd be an awful struggle on mouse and keyboard. Must. Resist. Urge. To. Make. Game. Unnecessarily. Difficult.

>>3456 >it was a 10 person group !!! How the hell did that work? By all accounts that's a player count where you start needing assistant GMs, subparties, and pretty meticulous planning. >The varying motivations of the difference player characters led to them having beef with each other which then spilled over into the real world and that just wasn’t fun. Oh dear. It sounds absurd on the surface, but then one remembers that the players would perceive each other as needlessly getting in the way of the fun. If that was happening, I can see why the group disbanded. I certainly wouldn't want to play with that kind of emotional backdrop making everything awkward. Couldn't be worse than the time an 8ch/tg/ anon had a divorce kick off at their table, at least. >I also was really disappointed in myself because of one particular case where I picked up that the only other girl in the party wanted to do something but I hadn’t written anything to even begin to explore that as a possibility (she’d have been blinked to another part of the continent, away from everyone else in the party) so I just rushed through my description in a way that left no time for objections, and she was visibly crestfallen. Of course, I don't know the actual details of how you ran things for them, but was it expected that you should have been able to accommodate a character suddenly popping away, solo, to another continent? Seems reasonable to shut it down, even if she thought it would have been fun. That sounds to me like the kind of thing that pulls GM time away from everyone else without entertaining them and requires the GM to put in a lot of unexpected extra work, and thus would be quite inconsiderate for a player to want to do. Still, it's never a happy thing to let someone down. >I’ve heard this before but from the other way, if they can’t tell you why it should be kept then it should be scrapped. That is the more common line, yes, whether expressed as the monkeys-and-ladders clipart comic, or thus: “Tradition is the democracy of the dead. It means giving a vote to the most obscure of all classes: our ancestors.” It's usual in such stories to present tradition as senseless worship of ashes, as something terribly crippling and binding that must be regarded with great suspicion if we are to free ourselves, or else as a dead but comfortable thing that encourages laziness of thought that leads to decay. The problem I have with this is that it presents itself as brave and exploratory thinking while actually being quite a small and limited perspective. I don't understand it, and it's getting in my way, so it has to go! Sometimes, by accident, it's correct—especially when the "tradition" is not tradition at all but convention—but often it ends up irreparably breaking and erasing terribly important links to deep systems that developed organically over a very long time, perfectly fit to solve problems that most have long forgotten. Problems which, given the opportunity, are only too happy to make a patient but powerful return. As a pocket example of the principle, take cassava roots. Very important food, vital calories for those cultures who relied and still rely on them. One catch: They're poisonous. Hydrogen cyanide. To make cassava safe requires an intense and tedious multi-day, multi-step process involving repeated cycles of grating, soaking, fermentation, drying, and grinding. Now, if you don't do this or you do it incompletely, you won't notice any immediate effects. Some processing will remove the bitter taste and stop immediate poisoning. But over time those who consume the incompletely-processed flour will be slowly poisoned and develop paralysis in their legs.

>>3458 >How the hell did that work? The group started out with 4, but then they told their friends how much fun they were having and everyone wanted to join, so people trickled in over time. There were times when they separated into different groups and I ran their stuff separately, other times they were all together. It didn’t feel very difficult to me, they gave me their backstories and I knew enough about the setting to just let things flow with what they wanted. You want to go hunt trolls? For sure, you’ve got that. Looking for a job in town? Ethereal filchers have been causing trouble for the townsfolk, nicking all kinds of things, go hunt em down. Wana go kill dragons? Ok, good luck funding one since they’ve been dead forever but put an ear to the ground and see what you can dig up. They just wanted to go around and have a good time, I threw plothooks at them until they stuck then played up the things they asked lots of questions about or showed interest in. Wound up on an adventure surrounding the fate character’s now mother, elven refugees, the search for the dead dwemmer (and for boatmurdered, if you’re familiar with the dwarf fortress story), and the perfect fishing net. They were hardly interested in the civil war or the dragons, so played with minimal interaction on that axis for months until things fell apart between players. I think the fallout is also partially my fault, since I was relying heavily on their input for what to do and when they didn’t all agree they butted heads. But the good times were good, they gave me a lot of praise for the campaign, and they seemed to be engaged. I hope they had fun in the end. >was it expected that you should have been able to accommodate a character suddenly popping away, solo, to another continent? I don’t really know how expected it was to be honest. I had presented D&D as a game where anything can happen, and I do believe that to be true and that it’s part of what makes it great, and up until that point I had never really outright said “no, you cant do that” and instead it was more like “you’re sure you want to 1v50 the entire town guard after stealing a sweetroll? You realize you won’t get to reload like in the game, right?” For more context we were wrapping up an adventure with a stronger party who I had thrown in for funsies. Some of the characters were played by people from my last campaign who were in town for the week, and I wanted to show off some neat builds/have a higher level PC powered group to let the party know they aren’t the only adventuring group out there and some big fish are in that pond. I also had hoped that they could someday surpass this group in strength, which would have been really cool. After working together for a few sessions, their time together was coming to a close and it was time for the other group to go on and do high level stuff since they weren’t going to babysit the PCs. The two groups were having a debrief session after having achieved their joint goal, and as part of that everyone was asking each other questions about where they were going, what they were going to do next, how to get a hold of each other if either party heard anything relevant to the other, etc. Good roleplay was had all around. My friend, let’s call her Ann, expressed a lot of interest in these characters, specifically the translation/anthropological work being done by their non-combat scholar, and she seemed interested in getting involved in that part of the plot. The other players, however, weren’t super interested and were ready to move on to do other things, and so they said “yea, we’re good, they can leave” and then Ann started to speak up but I pretended I couldn’t hear her (I’m a little bit hard of hearing), closed out the farewell, and had the other party teleport away. I made the assumption that she wanted to go with them, and did some very fast brain thinking to come to the conclusion that if she asked to go there wasn’t a good reason for the other party to say no. They liked her, she could be helpful, and they were strong enough to teleport her over with them. So rather than let her say her peace and try to come up with reasoning why she can’t go, I just shut it down. In post session debrief she let the other players know that she wanted to go with the other group, that she would have if given the chance, and that since they are a group two people saying “we’re done” doesn’t mean that we are actually done. She was upset more that the other party members hadn’t consulted her before saying everyone was good, and I apologized and said “if I had heard you, I wouldn’t have just ended it like that. I’m sorry. If that happens again wave your arms or something to flag me down so I can know.” It twists my stomach to think about how I just lied to her face like that. It was not cool of me to just talk over her and ignore what she wanted just because I had a storyline panic. Good DMs know you don’t put anything in your game that you aren’t prepared to have your players touch/break, and I thought I knew that too but turns out I screwed up. I wasn’t a good friend or a good DM that night, but I learned my lesson at least and I can try to be better now. >I guess what I’m saying here is that those who came before us, whether those be ancestors or long-departed colleagues, were rarely the idiots we imagine them to be, and that it’s good to respect them, understand them, and question our urge to tear down what they built a little more than we presently do. The work and wit of our forebears is crushed under the heel of the march of progress. We think ourselves smarter than them, that progress exists and we have become better than they were. I think, though, that if you take the time to look back on what humanity has wrought you know that they had just as much capacity for greatness, and if we look at people’s behavior now we can see that we retain the same capacity for barbarity as well. A major factor separating us from witch trials and public hangings is that we have newer, more fashionable spectacles to be distracted by, but graphic and gory depictions of violence, both staged in film and captured live, shows us that we are still fascinated by brutality. We’re no better, we’re no worse. We’re just people, trying to get by in the world. Always have been, always will be. >Of course, when it comes to making creative works then one's free to do whatever one wants with respect to genre and convention. There's not a lot of consequence if you fuck up

>>3465 >The group started out with 4, but then they told their friends how much fun they were having and everyone wanted to join, so people trickled in over time. There were times when they separated into different groups and I ran their stuff separately, other times they were all together. It didn’t feel very difficult to me, they gave me their backstories and I knew enough about the setting to just let things flow with what they wanted. >But the good times were good, they gave me a lot of praise for the campaign, and they seemed to be engaged. I hope they had fun in the end. That does sound like fun. All things have their season, I suppose. >It twists my stomach to think about how I just lied to her face like that. It was not cool of me to just talk over her and ignore what she wanted just because I had a storyline panic. I understand why you're a bit torn up over it, now. At least that your conscience stung you shows you do have a conscience and that it's operating properly. >But you can achieve something similar by having some of the random encounters being more difficulty than the norm, not to the degree of a FOE, but still very challenging. The different parts of the dungeon floor can have totally different enemy spawn tables, and you can bet I can tell you which ones spawn the murder worms that wreck you in the first stratum, or the angry longneck who spends their starting turn buffing themselves so you have sufficient time to wet yourself before they one shot your party. I did consider the rare-encounter idea, but initially dismissed it as a way of giving that SD a little spiking. But mapping it to specific areas on specific floors does add something to it! If you can rig an encounter table such that the rare encounters feel like they can happen but don't happen so often or so strongly that they feel unfair, then they become part of the press-or-retreat tradeoff decision... >Not knowing if you’ll have to face something like that around the corner makes you paranoid, and leaves you wondering “do I really have enough to keep going? I’ll be ok if nothing too bad happens, but if I’m ambushed by enemies that use leg bind to stop us running we’re toast. ...as you point out. >a more level headed gamer would just plan for the worst case and be pleasantly surprised afterward But that's the interesting thing, right? If you set up a challenge just right, there's no one dominant strategy that'll bring you out. If the player has to choose to be level-headed or risk-taking, then you've made something interesting.

why the antlers?

>>3066 They’re historically a symbol of someone who gets cucked. When a man was cuckolded, he was usually the last to find out, so it was said that he had horns (i.e. everyone else could see them but he couldn’t). Lots of references to this concept in Shakespeare etc. So when cuckqueaning was coined, it was natural that symbolic horns/antlers came along too, since a cuckquean wears her horns happily.

>>1012 >/cuckquean/ coining "vixen" in late 2014 Oh Anon, that’s surely a typo, that would mean we introduced the term eight yea- Eight years ago. Oh dear.

>>3475 >widespread usage in 90s usenet stories Really? This is very big news if true! Very exciting to think there might be a cache of forgotten cuckqueaning culture on the old Internet. You're sure they were using "vixen" in the cuckqueaning sense of being "the other woman" rather than in the more general sense of "a woman considered to be sexually attractive"? Can you tell us more?

>>3414 >please do more breakdowns of literotoca stories If this thread is willing to recommend good stories for that, I’m willing to give them a whirl! >I guess AI’s not putting erotica writers out of business just yet. I gather from dropping in on /hgg/ that those who really like smut AIs like to play them like games and are willing to take the time to tweak their givens to produce the exact kind of thing they like, regardless of any weird digressions. Making something on the spot, tailored only to one person, is something that human-written erotica has never been able or willing to do, but many readers don’t want to custom-order their stuff, they want that unpredictably human touch that only a careful author can provide. I think they’ll both keep developing into different markets with separate demographics, at least unless there are some pretty fundamental breakthroughs in how AI works. >Short, sweet, clever, sexy. >Okay now that was weird. Good weird, but… Thank you very much! On the second one, I tried to weave the strange arbitrary nature of Madotsuki’s effects in, so credit for any good weirdness more properly goes to the original source work. >Sleep paralysis as a kind of bondage? Full disclosure: I actually reused the idea from one of my experiments with captioning, which is over at >>2716 if you want to take a look.

I’ve recently rediscovered literotica after quitting 3D 3D feels like I’m cheating on my husband even if I am just visualizing him cheating on me with them I have humbly taken this board’s suggestions but I keep coming back to this: https://www.literotica.com/s/the-collection-ch-01-2 Essentially MC-kun is a rich pervert who has a “collection” of gfs that pander to each one of his fetishes (bondage, housewife, cuckqueaning, piss, etc). It’s a harem, not pure queaning, but it’s a very hot premise. It has its flaws, (MC is an author fantasy insert, typical literotica tier sex scenes, etc) but it’s more grounded than many harem stories I’ve read. My favorite girls are Yua and Daphne. It’s only 6 chapters so I recommend reading the whole thing but Ch 5 is my favorite if you’re impatient. Sorry if this has already been posted but I’ve been thinking about this story for weeks.

>>3463 Good on you for listening to your conscience Anon. >It has its flaws, (MC is an author fantasy insert, typical literotica tier sex scenes, etc) but it’s more grounded than many harem stories I’ve read. >Ch 5 is my favorite if you’re impatient. Thank you for the recommendation anon, I'll give it a try! But, since it's a story you like a great deal, I apologize in advance for expressing my confusion about some parts. >"Did you ask those men you fucked yesterday the same question?" >Her head shot up in fear. She thought I didn't know? I knew everything that my slaves do. ... >"Not what we will do, what you will do. I have invited some guests that you will serve with your cunts. I will be satisfying myself with Yua." >"The cuck!" Dahlia's punishment for infidelity is to... not sleep with our narrator for two months, and instead to get gangbanged by more men? Alongside other members of the harem? I know this is supposed to be the old "you like it? Then drown in it" style of comeuppance, but it's a touch weird here, especially right next to the harem's being handed over for sex with guests being treated as perfectly normal, the very picture of fidelity. >To Dahlia it looked like I wasn't paying her any mind. In reality I was watching over her intently. ... The boys had started shoving their cocks down her throat when Yua finally arrived.

>>3463 >>3470 >here’s something I really like and that I can’t stop thinking about! In particular this part is my favourite! I hope you like it too! >thank you for telling us about it because now I can break down in detail how your favourite part SUCKS, it SUCKS Anon. I know this is imageboards, but really.

>>3473 Put like that, you're right. I didn't mean to go at someone's favorite thing, but regardless of intention I should have thought twice before I submitted that post. I'm sorry.

>>3433 >>3464 Yes and no. Depends whether you take a purely definitional approach or a historical/contextual one. From a purely descriptive standpoint, cuckquean has now come to mean any woman who gets cucked by anyone for any reason with or without her participation or knowledge. The term simply denotes a female victim of infidelity, without any fetish context. This was also its historical use: >1562: "Ye make hir a cookqueane." >1897: "Yes, that's her name! His cuckquean she is; his wife she is not and never shall be!" So a lesbian whose girlfriend commits infidelity with another girl or another guy would be called a cuckquean because she is a woman who has been cucked. But IMO this doesn't properly answer the question, which is about the cuckquean fetish. When you ask whether "a guy cucking a chick in a lesbian relationship" is the cuckquean fetish, then you have to ask what the cuckquean fetish is. From a historical/contextual standpoint you would go back to when "cuckquean" was resurrected as a term, and that was specifically in a fetish context to mean a woman who was complicit in her man's infidelity with other women. There was at the time also, separately, porn involving lesbians whose partners slept with with other women (and sometimes men), but this was called "lesbian cuckolding" since it was an adaptation of the more straightforward male cuckoldry formula to lesbians. >Both compersive and humiliation content are still cuckquean after all, and for me at least those two evoke VERY different feelings. Perhaps that's why there was a small war over the term in the early 2010s. From our old terminology thread: >The humiliation/compersion thing was actually the subject of a kind of holy war within the community some years ago. >When Jenn Coney (or some name like that) first started her blog around 2009-2010 and proclaimed herself the template cuckquean, severe humiliation, degradation and a stripping away of choice were a mandatory part of the term. The community was made up mainly of her followers and fans. Many had had their partners cheat on them and then post-rationalised it as something they wanted. There was a lot of competition to find even deeper levels of degradation or humiliation, the idea being that if you didn't you weren't a good cuckquean. >When a group of cuckqueans emerged and said "actually we're not so much into playing the helpless victim", some nasty scrapping ensured. The original group accused the new group of not being cuckqueans because they weren't deprived of choice and the new group accused the original group of not being cuckqueans because they were really just being abused.

>>3467 >Lesbian cuckqueaning is therefore impossible if a man is involved; the involvement of a man makes it lesbian cuckolding. QED. That doesn't follow from the above. In particular, you're relying on >However, because we and the culture at large are naughty little gender essentialists, this can't apply to a situation where the third partners are men because then the unfaithful "male" lesbian would be pushed into a female role. But it's irrelevant. Neko/tachi isn't a statement on initiative even if it's often falsely equated to such, and that continues to be true even if an established role is contextually inverted. In particular, you're imagining a lot of fixed role combinations (presumably because it lines up to hetshit) but neko-fucks-a-third-party and tachi-gets-fucked-by-a-third-party are extremely common - I'll interject for the sake of clarity that getting fucked and topping aren't mutually exclusive. You wouldn't say that a queen in the japanese bdsm sense is bottoming. Tachi-tops-man lines up with cuckquean sensibilities in terms of dom/subshit, but it denies the precious illusion of intrinsic gender-derived value that most content here seems to rely on. Everything else is an aside to that fact. >Which, let's face it, is a really really good term: Cuckquean. Feels great in the mouth. Just use netorare v. netorase like an actual human being instead of needlessly introducing ambiguity in a case where you're trying to mix water and motor oil. Pretending there's a commonality is just a failing of the art of the creator.

>>3469 Those sure are a lot of words. It's a shame I can't read. >Just use netorare v. netorase like an actual human being lol

>>3469 >That doesn't follow from the above It does since anon is trying to dig into unconscious gut feelings that don’t obey the Japanese lesbian laws, which is what I guess all this neko/tachi stuff is from. Of course femdom can top with penetration but exceptions like that don’t help explain why people above keep saying stuff like >eh, yeah, it’s technically cuckqueaning but calling it that feels kinda wrong And anyway our terms don’t line up perfectly with the Japanese ones. Ours describe different lines to theirs because of our different history and cultures. >>3467 >I gather that lesbians don't like bisexuals very much. I looked up the term and yeah, that seems to be it. >a situation where the more "female" lesbian partner encouraged the "male" lesbian partner to go and have sex with other girls would feel like lesbian cuckqueaning Pretty specific, but it kinda passes when I imagine it. It’s definitely not as strong but it doesn’t feel like cuckold either, which the opposite does. But even if >>3469 relies on Japanese jargon for lesbians and NTR, part of their point is still valid, which is that mapping hetero attitudes onto lesbian relationships might explain our hetero gut feelings but doesn’t tell us how they actually do things. Unless we hear from some actual lesbians who do lesbian cuckolding/cuckqueaning/whatever who can tell us what their terms and dynamics are then that’s as far as we can go for now.

>>3474 >anon is trying to dig into unconscious gut feelings that don’t obey the Japanese lesbian laws Pretty much, which is why I mentioned that I was relying on general cultural memes which, right or wrong, still exist. It's half speculation, half shitpost. >And anyway our terms don’t line up perfectly with the Japanese ones. Ours describe different lines to theirs because of our different history and cultures. Yes, this is important. Netorare and netorase in particular are shotgun terms that carry a lot of extra stuff along with them because of the way the Japanese have developed them as genres. What we think of as cuckqueaning partly intersects with what they think of as 逆NTR, but there's plenty of both areas that don't overlap. I can think of only a few Japanese works that fully express cuckqueaning, and only some of those would be considered even partial 逆NTR. >But even if >>3469 relies on Japanese jargon for lesbians and NTR, part of their point is still valid, which is that mapping hetero attitudes onto lesbian relationships might explain our hetero gut feelings but doesn’t tell us how they actually do things. Also very true. I took for granted that a reader would be considering my suggestions from that angle, given the whole post makes it clear that it's talking about cuckqueaning as it is practiced. What I was considering, broadly, was "how does this label for a fetish-cluster practiced and shaded mainly by heterosexual couples respond when applied to lesbian couples, but keeps its (cuckqueaning's) own terms of reference?" Maybe lesbians who do fidelity play have their own jargon for how they do this, maybe they borrow jargon and put new shading on it, whatever; what I was trying to figure out was why the label as we understood it didn't quite seem to fit unless we opened it all the way up to its broadest definition. >Unless we hear from some actual lesbians who do lesbian cuckolding/cuckqueaning/whatever who can tell us what their terms and dynamics are then that’s as far as we can go for now. We've had a few lesbians stop by before, attracted here by various reasons, but I can only recall two reports of any kind of actual cuckqueaning that involved anything that could be considered lesbian and involved a man. In the first case, the dynamic was one of the poster and her girlfriend mutually submitting to the man, who was a part-time play partner of theirs. The poster got tied up and her girlfriend got fucked, but it was clear that both were very submissive to the man for the duration of the play reported, which lasted a weekend. If I go and track down the ancient source... >Background: I have an unconventional arrangement where I sort of get double-cucked by two people I love. I have a lovely darling girlfriend (I'm a cis bisexual female) and a lovely thoughtful dom with a terribly sadistic streak and a huge cock. The three of us get together every other weekend or so as time allows. >I'm a cis bisexual female >bisexual

Danny Phantom

>>3350 >blue=sad Sounds pretty western to me.

>>1782 >Bawdy Falls >>1880 >incognitymous hasn't released newer ones yet I randomly thought of this comic today and went to see if it had updated. There was plenty more, including a nice little storyline involving camming, but the comments seemed to indicate that the artist stopped making new pages some time in 2021, and now I'm sad.

>>2359 People are saying this is canon now. Probably they're just projecting. I haven't been watching the show but I don't think anyone's officially a lesbian in it yet.

My Life as a Teenage Robot

I don't have the full context since I never watched it, but apparently Cortana gets cucked in the Halo tv show and even watches them make out. Who's "them", I don't know.

>>3425 The retarded TV show canon gives that incident some decidedly fucked up vibes. Still technically cuckquean...?

>>3425 >>3426 Cheif cucks Cortana almost as hard as this show cucks anyone who wanted something even remotely good.

>>2850 >Do you plan to have kids? Maybe >Would you be okay with the vixen getting pregnant? It depends, if things went full polygynist marriage sure. No point in being irresponsible. >How do you plan to tell the kids about daddy spending time with a woman who isn't mommy? Likely wouldn't be an issue till they were older and realized that things were off between Dad, Mom, and Auntie; even then it likely wouldn't be a big deal as were rather religious and we'd only have to explain that we were unconventional and not to make a big deal of it

Relevant news article about a polyamorous woman who gave her husband a threesome for his birthday, leading to the other woman getting pregnant: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/hubby-baby-woman-threesome-anniversary-26631200

>>3348 Sorry, I made a typo. It was their anniversary, not his birthday.

You probably just have to think ahead with your explanations. If the kids know that the situation is not the standard then they don't need to know the specifics really. Family structures have already been all sorts of weird for thousands of years anyway.

>>3427 What would you tell them at various ages, Anon?

test

Hello /cuckquean/! I’m glad you’re still here.

>>3412 Even though we're ded?

>>3415 Especially so!

>>3415 >>3416 I for one am completely at peace with our demise.

Speaking of tape, I just found out about 3M's Microfoam surgical tape. It's apparently quite comfortable and looks really good when used for this sort of thing because it picks up outlines well, though like all tapes I imagine it shouldn't be worn over the pussy for a long time (as >>2951 's experience shows). Has anyone tried it before?

Important question: who do you want to hold the key to the belt? The man or the vixen?

>>2972 The man, obviously.

>>161 >Do you want a belt of your own? Yeah, kinda. The idea’s hot but I just can’t get over the idea of peeing and pooping with a belt locked on. Like, I already know how it works, I just… you know?

>>3411 I think if you're careful it's okay. I've seen accounts from those who've gone sixty days or more continuously locked up. Know what you mean though; I'd be worried about stuff like UTIs. I do wonder if I'd want to go as long as 60 days. If I did I'd definitely want there to be some emergency protocols in place. Regardless of how long I was in the belt for, I'd also want my man to wear my key around his neck. Maybe it would have a cute tag engraved with my name.