>>5058
> I was debating if I should say anything or just leave the same anon making the same puzzles and not getting a hint.
3 or 4 different anons have been taking turns making them.
>You may not know this but having the same thread on the front takes the discussion of other threads that may have a bump or two.
before the puzzle thread i wood come here eberry 2 weeks or so and there wood be maybe 1 or 2 new posts, are we not meant to bump a thread because it might be slightly easier for an anon to find a response to a 2 week old post? there aren't that many threads it isn't hard. besides, any other thread that gets bumped will always be the second thread after this, so it's a nonissue.
>Either way I'm not even doing puzzles anymore, I just wanted this to become more in the board culture instead of a glorified chatroom.
explains why you think only one anon is making the puzzles. glorified chatroom? it's a community thing right, why does it matter if anons chat while they do the puzzle?
>Posting a reply for a person that isn't even talking to you in that tone wasn't berry nice either.
i'm just annoyed that you are micromanaging a successful thread because it got more popular than you wanted it to be? i really don't see the issue, and the reason i took that tone is because i can tell you are being passive aggressive about the whole thing and it's killing the buzz.