>>23366
>The Latin Vulgate is the only Bible For Catholics
Which Latin Vulgate? The Nova Vulgata of 1979? The Benedictine Vulgate commissioned by Pius X? The Clementine Vulgate of 1592? The Sixtine Vulgate of 1590? The 1547 Leuven Vulgate, published immediately as a response to Trent? The Codex Amiatinus of the 8th century, the best preserved early medieval Vulgate manuscript? The Stuttgart Vulgate reconstruction of Jerome's earliest text? Jerome himself made three editions of the Psalter: the Romana based on the Old Latin Psalter, the Gallicana based on the Greek Psalter, and the juxta Hebraicum based on the Hebrew Psalter, each with different content. Which one of these is authoritative? There is no one Vulgate: it is a text that has been adulterated. Which is the pure Vulgate?
>and the Douay-Rheims is the approved English translation in America
And there are two authorized Douay-Rheims versions. The original version of 1582-1610, which was accosted for sticking
too close to the Vulgate, and the revision by Challoner of 1750. However, Challoner's version wasn't a revision at all, but an adaptation of the KING JAMES VERSION to conform to Vulgate renderings. Yet nobody uses the original Douay-Rheims over an embellished Protestant text, not even the foremost of conservatives:
https://originaldouayrheims.com/
>Knox, NAB, and others made after Vatican II and not based on the Vulgate not so much.
The Knox Bible was published in 1945, years before Vatican II.