>>23034 Ok I have a question, you mentioned the bumplocked /meta/ that you remove posts that have infographics about Judaism/Nazism/Communism etc and how those belong on /pol/. does this mean we're no longer allowed to discuss those things within a Christian context or just a political one? Or do they belong in designated threads?

>>23040 According to >>17684 I allowed there to be one thread for discussing Christianity-related conspiracies, provided they stay moderately relevant to Christianity. You can make a thread for that and use it as your dumping ground for those images. Just don't drag good threads off-topic with them,

Is there by chance an anti-catholic bias on this board? Memes making fun of catholics are left alone, anything making fun of atheists or protestants gets removed. Is that right?

>>23043 I say remove both of them. They do nothing to edify the reader nor increase our faith in the Lord.

your board. You can delete all the Catholics you want.

>>23043 >Is there by chance an anti-catholic bias on this board? No. There is a bias against dragging threads off-topic with ad-hominems and strawmanning like your first image. Green frog pictures and wojaks are also verbolten. >Memes making fun of catholics are left alone, anything making fun of atheists or protestants gets removed. Is that right? No.

>>23043 Only Methodists hate wine.

>>23034 My complaint is with this post, which seems to say that you can complain about moderation as long as your complaint is submissive, pathetic and empty I also complain about all the captchas which are making the board unusable

Allowing an accusation that Pope Benedict was Nazi because he was in the Hitler youth, while banning a rebuttal that explained what that meant makes the Hitler Youth argument against Francis and all Catholics a Reductio ad Hitlerum fallacy. Allowing folks to point out the wickedness of some Catholic priests, while banning posts that are show that they shouldn't be casting the first stone by posting examples of equally wicked protestant ministers, or a rebuttal about the infiltration of the Catholic Church... is siding with the Protestants. Damning Catholics for making a idol of the Cross (seriously?) and then deleting that along with an explanation that Catholics keep the crucifix to remind themselves of the how great the sacrifice of Christ was, is anti-Catholic bias. If the Crucifix is part of the problem that some see with Catholicism, why not let the use of the Crucifix be explained.

>>23044 That would be the most fair approach.

>>23047 But an atheist/protestant being a liar, or at best an ignorant spreading ignorance, is fine, and any rebuttal to their falsity must get removed, because that would be to "drag threads off-topic" Truth and education is off-topic, when lies are being spread. That's what happens here. Memes full of lies attacking catholicism = educated argument Memes making fun of the ignorance of the enemies of the church = low quality off-topic This is called hypocrisy. To lie, knowing to be lying. (or if there is no awareness at all, a sad case of ignorance reinforcing itself)

>>23056 It's not a fair world. Some people will make a really absurd argument just because they don't want to admit they're wrong, and they usually have other reasons than for what they're saying.

>>23056 If you respond to a bait post by a protestant and your post gets deleted it's probably because jannys deleted the other post and just got rid of yours to prevent the board from being filled with a bunch of off topic posts that link back to nothing. Also we literally have a designated interdenominational shit flinging thread so if bait or flaming is post outside of that thread then just ignore it and report.

>>23052 If you can't formulate a respectful, calm, and rational post that at the same time firmly and boldly states your opposition to something the moderation does then that says more about you than anything else.

Captcha are annoying tho especially on mobile

>>23078 Captcha threshhold increased to 75 PPH. That should be more than enough.

>>23049 thats clearly a beer

Why is there 2 meta threads?

>>23201 Last one hit the reply limit and I kept it for reference. Made an archive of it and added a link in the OP here.

>>23203 couldn't you have just deleted some posts like you usually do?

>>23238 Damn bro, you got the whole squad laughin

posting this to the top of the board

>>23337 based and truthpilled

Enabled R9K as there is a lot of reposting the same posts/files over and over again.

This post is directed at the local frothing-at-the-mouth Catholic of the board: Stop. Stop dragging threads off-topic with your Catholic slapfighting. Stop spamming QTDDTOT with answers nobody wanted to questions nobody asked. Stop newlining every sentence and redditspacing them. Stop evading bans when your posts get mass deleted for dragging threads off-topic. Stop making your presence so obvious to everyone. Instead, consider the following: >make good posts that are short, to-the-point, and formatted in a way that a normal human can read >stop creating problems where there are none >if you really can't help yourself, keep it in >>20996 I have received numerous complaints from other anons regarding your posts, and I'm done with it. Any more of your nonsense outside of the slapfight thread is delete on sight, no questions asked. Change your style and fit in, or leave.

>>23423 >Change your style and fit in, or leave. This. He's definitely damaged the board BO. I have numerous Catholic & Orthodox friends, I'm Protestant, and we're all Christians, all part of the body of Christ. That anon's intensive villification of everything non-Catholic is both very off-putting, and quite non-Biblical.

>>23423 Bravo! Thank you! https://youtu.be/DHNfCXioIVU

>>23423 >>stop creating problems where there are none >>23238 is the only post of mine that i've been able to make this month without it being deleted

>>23423 Here's as much of the deleted off-topic posts from the thread as could be recovered (missing the 8th post 23343 (a question), 14-18 (Prot post asking if anyone believes in tradcath anon's doctrine, he responds that that criticism is an ad populum fallacy, a quip by a third anon about the vanity of the discussion, and two lost posts), and the 26th post 23417 (a reply from the tradcath anon stating that he didn't say it wasn't possible to follow the Bible without the Church, but rather that it wasn't possible to understand it)) archived for posterity's sake: https://archive.is/GOxFI https://archive.ph/NBRbP https://archive.ph/R8pHi https://archive.is/hwTwl https://archive.is/zADfA

>>23423 Well said. I suggest deleting all the responses too as these also derail threads and render them useless for further discussion. If anons want a futile sectarian slapfight we already have a thread for that. It's also the duty of all of us to take a Christian attitude to the provocation of trolls. Resist the temptation to respond, no matter how good your comeback is, and let BO do as he says. Then the trolls will have to samefag their arguments and the whole lot can be deleted. Report the bait and move on. >>23425 >we're all Christians, all part of the body of Christ Amen.

Tvch as usual is blight full of atheists and pagans. Gahoole got a new mod, probably a tranny, who is actively banning Christians, but have zero problem with pedoposters, pagans creating D&C and porn.

>>23576 seethe

>>23576 >Salvation comes from the Jews Based?

>>23576 The problem is you caring about what tvch thinks at all