/christian/ - Christianity

Religious discussions and spirituality

SAVE THIS FILE: Anon.cafe Fallback File v1.1 (updated 2021-12-13)

Want your event posted here? Requests accepted in this /meta/ thread.

Max message length: 20000

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

Board Rules
More

(used to delete files and postings)


Open file (5.14 MB 3000x2172 churchwallpaper.jpeg)
De-Radicalisation in the name of Christ. Anonymous 04/02/2022 (Sat) 16:07:46 No.7176
I imagine many of you are familiar with being on different chans, so chances are you were racist for a time, and perhaps still are, but to those ones that moved past racism, how did you do so? I have overcome 'white pride' as that was an easy one to reconcile with the Lord (gay pride, trans pride, black pride, white pride; it's all pride and thus a sin) But I've found /pol/ to be very alluring in its racism, and in many ways it's hard to refute what's in front of your eyes, albeit a lot of the information is sensationalised at the very least if not untrue. I want to love more, I don't want hate needlessly, I hate what is immoral, unjust, spiteful, anything that goes against God; but I want to love like Jesus loved, but being racist still makes a lot of sense to me.
I'm come to Christianity from a lifetime of Judeo-Atheism so my sobered eyes it's clear "De-Radicalisation" is another word for Faggotization
>>10890 But hatred and not loving your neighbor is, you can hate evil, but you cannot hate your brother.
>>7232 fuck off you cunt
The bible says not to mix up the nations, babylon and babel were hated by Jahovia because of the mixing of nations. Jah created the seperate tounges of men and the kindreds for perfection and actualisation of His holy design. It is wickedness to mix up and thereby destroy the pedigree Jahovia established.
>>11045 I would rather have a Godly Nigger breed my petite daughter and knock her up with mischling spawn than to allow her to have children with a white pagan sodomite.
>>11045 God hated Babel because it consisted of satan worshippers who were trying to exalt themselves over God. It had nothing to do with race.
I don't think anyone on this board is a "radical", but maybe people on other boards are.
>>11046 Copypasta twitterfag
https://hastebin.skyra.pw/raw/lisexuneka Please read. It's about porn addiction and the internet inducing this sort of sickness, but it also pertains to radicalization. Give it a read. It's long, fair warning.
>>11047 Alright then answer me this. The satanists of today are promoting race mixing. Why would they do that if God didn't mind it? Because the truth is God does mind it. The reality is that race mixing is a punishment God places upon us for not following his law.
>>11211 the satanists also have bowel movements, guess i cant shit anymore. listen dude, if you dont have any Biblical support for it then stop trying to make it a Christian issue. the closest thing the Bible talks about to racial segregation is ethnic segregation (for example Leviticus 25:23 which talks about God owning all the land and alludes to Him dividing it amongst people) whether or not you choose to race mix is up to you, from a genetic standpoint i think its a bad idea because each race's dna is tailored to best fit its environment and thus mixing them together can cause them to cancel each other out and create a child who is genetically inferior to both its parents, but do you really think God cares? If God loves, cherishes even, the ugly, the stupid, and everything in between then do you really think He's gonna be all upset about a person of mixed race?
>>11045 Pentecost is the reversion of Babel. Your evil ideology has led to White incels shooting innocent black shoppers at the supermarket. You are of your father the devil.
>>11221 >the satanists also have bowel movements, guess i cant shit anymore. This is a ridiculous comparison. Bowel movement was directly made by God and is completely natural and thus doesn't Go against God's creation. Racial mixing completely goes against the entire purpose of Eve being created to begin with. I posted it in another thread but Adam and Eve were created separately from other people groups and more importantly Eve was specifically created due to Adam not having a groom. Genesis 2:20 "And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him." >>10236 this is the post where is shows that we and other people groups were made separately. Racial mixing is straight up a punishment from God. Deuteronomy 28:43 "The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low" This is mentioned as one of the curses that God will bring upon Israel if they become disobedient. Obviously this is something that has happened to Europe and other Countries Jews, Africans, Arabs all have been risen above Europeans in worth because we refuse to follow God's Law. And guess who we can blame for that. Even more Evidence that we are disobeying God's word comes from Deuteronomy 28:48 "Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the LORD shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee." This one literally says Race mixing is put into these curses as well. If it was a good thing God wouldn't use it to punish Israel. Deuteronomy 28:32 "Thy sons and thy daughters shall be given unto another people, and thine eyes shall look, and fail with longing for them all the day long: and there shall be no might in thine hand.” This obviously fits the Jews like a glove, Like it or not the Jews are trying to destroy us and this is how they are going about it. Obviously I think blaming the Jews entirely is wrong. No we should be blaming ourselves for disobeying God and then we should repent for our sins then follow God's righteous law and Believe on Jesus' death and resurrection and believe that Jesus is the christ. and only then will our nations be saved.
>>11226 Daily reminder that Moses was a 'race-mixer'.
>>11226 >Racial mixing is straight up a punishment from God. >Deuteronomy 28:48 >"Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the LORD shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and he shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until he have destroyed thee." >This one literally says Race mixing is put into these curses as well. If it was a good thing God wouldn't use it to punish Israel. They werent a different race, they were the same color as the Israelites the only difference was that they were a different ethnicity. Nobody wants their ethnicity to be destroyed because thats your culture, your history, and your heritage therefore God used it as a punishment. >This obviously fits the Jews like a glove, Like it or not the Jews are trying to destroy us and this is how they are going about it. so thats why Jewish women are marrying and fucking black and brown men too? Degeneracy doesnt care about your race or ethnicity but you seem to have convinced yourself that it does. Degeneracy kills indiscriminately just like its father the devil. We have (largely thanks to liberalism and communism) given ourselves over to degeneracy and thus you see the degradation in the west today. Unless you consider Karl Marx and John Locke to be Jews then there isnt much of a Jewish conspiracy there. > Obviously I think blaming the Jews entirely is wrong. No we should be blaming ourselves for disobeying God and then we should repent for our sins then follow God's righteous law and Believe on Jesus' death and resurrection and believe that Jesus is the christ. and only then will our nations be saved. well i agree there.
>>11228 Don't take my post out of context you deliberately didn't post the other two verses that I used. Like it or not these refugees are sojourners and they fit like a glove. The Jews are also sojourners. Even if it were referring to "other whites" which is bogus considering the fact that nothing implies that because the Israelites were allowed to mingle with the Egyptians for a time and said Child was allowed in the congregation after three generations. Nothing you've posted has discredited what I have said. We have disobeyed God's law and now we are feeling the punishment of it. A great way to figure out if God wants you to do something is too look at the end results of what your action does. The results of a race mixing pair is a kid with numerous mental problems, Adultery completely destroys a family, Incest also results in a child with mental problems as well. >>11227 Moses went out with a Cushite women. Who are of the lineage of Ham.
Open file (36.52 KB 400x240 bait.png)
>non-whites and women don't have souls
>>11240 i "didnt post the other two verses" because they were repeats of what i quoted. >Like it or not these refugees are sojourners and they fit like a glove not sure what this is referencing. >Even if it were referring to "other whites" which is bogus considering the fact that nothing implies that because the Israelites were allowed to mingle with the Egyptians for a time and said Child was allowed in the congregation after three generations. Maybe its just me but i dont see what youre referencing nor the importance of it. >Nothing you've posted has discredited what I have said. Im open to persuasion but nothing youve posted has managed to do that. If you can create a strong Biblically backed argument reflecting your ideas then i will agree with you.
Open file (44.49 KB 1503x166 ClipboardImage.png)
>>11241 im deleting these posts for now on. youve spammed the board with the same thing atleast a dozen times now. Either engage in actual (Biblically backed) discussion of your ideas or, well, dont and ill just delete your posts.
schizo BTFO
I became fixated on the JQ when I came across it. I spring boarded from researching Q and "the deep state" to pinpointing the enemy as being the elite *jew*. As I dug deeper and learned more, I began throwing the words Kike and Nigger around alot. I held resentment behind those words. Kike for the jews and I used nigger interchangeably for anyone of any color that acted like... a nigger. The morality of this weighed on me and to a lesser degree still does today. I would classify my headspace as express racism. In day to day interactions I treat everyone with utmost respect until they give me a reason to hold a negative judgement against them. (Judge not by the color of their skin but content of their character type deal). In conversation, when I use racial slurs it is directed at the globalists and degenerate individuals. I still didnt feel right about it all so I started praying about it. I would express how I felt, express how I knew it conflicted with Christ's message (Love God more than anything else and love your neighbor as you love your self) and I asked how I can appropriately assess and process my thoughts and actions. It's been a couple months and I havent fully sorted out the "racism" but I know that love would not exist without hate and that our enemies hate us. Therefore, for self preservation, I will resist them with a needed level of hate. Our lives are a walk with Christ, we are not made whole over night.
>>11249 blessed
>>11242 Race mixing is fine but not with blacks. Blacks really are between man and animal. I'm sorry but it's true. Not only that, blacks don't have a humanist bone in their body; everything and I mean EVERYTHING with them is "gibs me dat cuz I'm black raycis." The ones who are Christian are only so because their use Jesus as just another tool in their arsenal of accusing others of being racist, which means they don't actually believe in Christ. Christianity for them is just another prediction of their idolatry. I'm totally fine with every other race besides blacks, including Jews.
>>11276 This post is Satanic. You realize that the only reason you say such things is because of Masonic evolutionary theories such as Darwinism? Such theories were concocted to justify satanic ideologies of progress, racism, Social Darwinism, etc. The Bible teaches that creatures were created according to their kinds - kinds can be quite internally diverse, but each kind is still the same kind. Blacks, Whites, Asians, all humans, all fall within the larger kind of 'human', descended from Adam. There is no such thing as an intermediary between animal and man. This is a Darwinian / Masonic idea that is not found in the Bible.
Open file (88.62 KB 625x626 b82.jpg)
>>11319 If racism is a sin why did God order Israel to genocide the Canaanites?
>>11468 Because they were a sinful and idolatrous people did you even read the Bible
>>11473 t.shitskin
>>11473 One of the definitions of racism. the systemic oppression of a racial group to the social, economic, and political advantage of another The Canaanites are a group of people born of Ham who was cursed by God due to Ham seeing the nakedness of his father. Genesis 9:22. This qualifies as racism. Also it's completely stupid for you too say that we all came from the same ancestor when 1) Adam and Eve are both the exact same in terms of racial makeup due to Eve being made of Adam's rib. 2) Noah having 3 Children who we have evidence of all 3 being at least some form of Caucasian. David was described as having a ruddy complexion in 1 Samuel 17:42, The Egyptians have genetic evidence that they are somewhat related to british people. https://www.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801 3) Genesis 1 and 2 which say Adam was created after the seventh day while the other people groups were made on the 6th day. Don't get me wrong. Africans and Asians are a part of God's creation of course they are everything was made by God but to say they are the same as us Caucasians is really stretching it. I'm also under the belief that they can be saved as well. I know a lot about this and I can make a thread on it because there's quite a lot to unpack.
>>11474 >>11476 t. pilpul
>>11474 t. ad hominem
>>11476 the amount of coping and retardation in this single post is absurd you arent even "reading into" the Bible anymore, youre just twisting it.
>>7176 Racism as it's defined and used is meaningless. It's just a weapon to brow-beat whitey and I'm not even going to pretend other races are subjected to the same hate by the ZOG and the synagogue of satan media. >>7272 God NEVER renamed Israel to Jew. There is absolutely no evidence that we know as modern Jews were ever God's chosen people. This is just a fact, but people get so uppity when this is pointed out. Reinforcing the point: NOWHERE in the Bible do we see "Jews" being called God's chosen and NOWHERE do we see "Israel" being renamed to "Jew". This Zionist subversion of Christianity really needs to end already. I'm sick of so-called Christians being duped into supporting a rogue genocidal terrorist state that hosts what is known as the "gay capital of the world" or the "gay capital of the middle east"
>>11519 Good job there disproving anything I said. I certainly hope this >>11479 wasn't you. You never even explained why my reasoning was "retarded" because everyone with a brain knows that two people of the same stock can't produce an individual of a separate race. I am reading into the bible. You can't read Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 and then tell me with a straight face that Adam was created on the sixth day, When God specifically mentions in Genesis 2 that Adam was made AFTER the seventh day. Furthermore Adam was made without a woman and Eve was created to be his helpmate. While the original peoples were made both male and female. You say I'm twisting scripture but in reality I'm simply reading scripture the way it was intended.
>>11522 >God NEVER renamed Israel to Jew. There is absolutely no evidence that we know as modern Jews were ever God's chosen people. This is just a fact, but people get so uppity when this is pointed out. Reinforcing the point: NOWHERE in the Bible do we see "Jews" being called God's chosen and NOWHERE do we see "Israel" being renamed to "Jew". thats because Israel dissipated. The only thing that was left was Judah and hence the name Jews. the other ten tribes went into captivity and eventually were spread all across the world, mainly into Europe. >>11525 i called you retarded because you completely over looked the most obvious answer to your question which is that Genesis two is a in-depth telling of the sixth day mentioned in Genesis 1. anyone who has read either chapter will know that Genesis one is a brief over view, going from there the obvious conclusion is that Genesis two is a in-depth look. And then theres the logical inconsistencies with your theory. Your theory is that God created Adam separate of the "other races", if so then how come God also created the other races in His own image? im assuming that what youre trying to say is that Adam was different or somehow superior to the other races? So then why didnt God only make Adam in His image? Even if you were correct (which you are not) and Genesis two describes the creation of another race then that would still mean that the other races were to be treated same as Adam since they too were made in Gods image.
>>11526 >i called you retarded because you completely over looked the most obvious answer to your question which is that Genesis two is a in-depth telling of the sixth day mentioned in Genesis 1 Oh really, I'll post both then to show you how wrong you are. Genesis 1:26-31 "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 29And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 31And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." Simple enough to understand. God created humanity on the sixth day but notice the fact that God created male and female at the same time. If what you are saying is true and that Genesis 1 is the exact same telling as Genesis 2 then this means it's a contradiction, Which it isn't because we have evidence to prove otherwise. Genesis 2:1-7 "1Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 3And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. 4These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, 5And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 6But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. 7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." Notice it says here plainly that God made Adam after the seventh day. This literally can't be denied. It doesn't say anything about going into detail about the sixth day. If it did then the writer of Genesis would've been better off just writing the details of the sixth day when it was actually relevant. >And then theres the logical inconsistencies with your theory. Your theory is that God created Adam separate of the "other races" it's not a theory it's a fact. Adam was made different from the other people groups because he was made with an intended purpose to look after the Garden of Eden. Nothing about this contradicts God creating the other people in his image either because we all share a similar body structure. differences between races outside of skin color. Like Africans having larger noses or Europeans being taller than average or Asians with their slant eyes. >im assuming that what youre trying to say is that Adam was different or somehow superior to the other races?... Genesis two describes the creation of another race then that would still mean that the other races were to be treated same as Adam since they too were made in Gods image. Just because they were made in the image of God doesn't mean they are the same as Adam. Because if what you said is true then the creation of Eve would've been unnecessary because God could've simply given Adam one of the women found in the other people groups. This is how Cain was able to build a city as well. If it was true that Adam and Eve were the first people made their sons Cain and Abel. Cain killed Abel. But Cain was afraid someone would find him and slay him. Now back then If only Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel were alive who was Cain afraid of? Genesis 4:14 "Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me." Now here's where things get interesting. Cain moved to the land of Nod which was east of Eden or pretty much in Asia. Now Cain was given a mark to be Identified. Genesis 4:15-16 "And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him. 16And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden." Now this mark we don't know what it was exactly but it was to protect him from being killed by other people.
Open file (113.78 KB 988x449 ClipboardImage.png)
>>11529 First off youre kinda misrepresenting my point. Im not arguing over the contents of the verses im arguing over the Chapters and their purpose. Genesis 1 is a overview Genesis 2 is a in-depth look at the sixth day. >Simple enough to understand. God created humanity on the sixth day but notice the fact that God created male and female at the same time. If what you are saying is true and that Genesis 1 is the exact same telling as Genesis 2 then this means it's a contradiction, Which it isn't because we have evidence to prove otherwise. it doesnt say that male and female were created at the same time, it just says that they were created.... on the same day, which Genesis 2 backs up. for reference: >So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. >Notice it says here plainly that God made Adam after the seventh day. This literally can't be denied. It doesn't say anything about going into detail about the sixth day. If it did then the writer of Genesis would've been better off just writing the details of the sixth day when it was actually relevant. Genesis 1 gives an overview of creation, the first 3 verses of Genesis 2 describe the seventh day, nothing was created on the seventh day thus it wasnt included with the other sixth. also the very verses you quoted prove you wrong >These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, 5And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 6But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. 7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. verse 4-7 literally describes the earth after the fifth day. Also your own theory is contradicting itself, how can there "not be a man to till the ground" if God had already created other races of mankind? Aswell if God is creating Adam after the seventh day doesnt that make Adam inferior in a way, as if He were an afterthought? This is what happens when you try and mix racialist thought into the Bible. >It doesn't say anything about going into detail about the sixth day. If it did then the writer of Genesis would've been better off just writing the details of the sixth day when it was actually relevant. The writer of Genesis (Moses) wanted to go into specific detail about mans creation on the sixth day, thus you have Genesis 2 and the verses within it, if youd read the entire chapter youd get that. >Now back then If only Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel were alive who was Cain afraid of? its believed that Adam and Eve had other children then Cain Able and Seth. The Bible just names the important ones. The proof in this (aswell as everything else im saying) lies in one of the verses at the end of Genesis chapter 3 pic related heres an article on the subject of Cain if youre interested: https://www.gotquestions.org/Cains-wife.html
Open file (102.79 KB 916x614 ClipboardImage.png)
>>11530 also since i know youre gonna try and split hairs here is what the Bible says about the meaning of the word "man"
Open file (51.53 KB 939x190 ClipboardImage.png)
>>11531 also this verse implies that God created Adam outside the garden then placed him there. (BSB btw)
>>11530 Alright I'll admit I was wrong but not because of anything you wrote but because in the middle of arguing with you I checked genesis 5 to see show that indeed Adam begot sons and Daughters. But it also completely backed up your viewpoint so that's on me.
>>11536 Chapter 5 also doesnt talk about any sons born before Seth. Im not sure why it never talks about any siblings other than Cain and Able before Seth, perhaps it was lost throughout the ages and God didnt feel it important enough to document. it makes sense why He would do that, you kinda just reason it out on your own. Unfortunately the texts of the Bible are just too vague to satisfy some areas of our curiosity. and dont worry about it
Edited last time by AntichristHater on 05/22/2022 (Sun) 11:07:52.
>>11537 The problem I see is that there's no room for Adam and Eve to make different people groups. Because Eve was made of Adams ribs Which would mean she was of the same stock as Adam. Similar situation applies with Noah's kids. Nowhere do the negro nor the Asian appearing make any sense. That's why I assumed Genesis 1 and 2 were different creation events. because it Gave me a logical conclusion as to why each people could come about. The word Adam in hebrew actually comes from the word red. Which is something you'd equate to Europeans due to a ruddy complexion and David later on also had a ruddy complexion. The egyptian pharoah also had DNA very similar to britain which I posted earlier. My idea was that The negro was the first created, Then Came the Adamic people groups then after that came the Asians who were made as a result of Cain's sin and his intermixing. After all the word mongoloid is eerily similar to mongrel.
>>11538 i could understand why you would believe that, at first glance it makes sense. Going solely off the Bible there is no real explanation of the different races but we do know based off observing animals that via natural selection animals (and presumably humans) will naturally "select" the genes best suited for their environment. Thats why you have the differences in skin tone, physical features, and hair. also just so you know (and im not 100% sure since i dont read Hebrew and its a relatively complex language) but Adam supposedly means "ground"
>>11539 The word Adam here https://biblehub.com/hebrew/120.htm Comes from this word which means ruddy. https://biblehub.com/hebrew/119.htm Evolution is a masonic ideology. I wouldn't trust anything that comes out of it especially considering the fact that 10000 years isn't nearly long enough for any mutations to take place. That's the earliest time agriculture was done. That not even getting into how improbable each successive mutation actually is. So I don't think that'd come even close to it because we have at least a somewhat decent timeline on when agriculture first began. Which was the purpose God made Adam for.
>>11541 macro evolution is complete bs micro evolution is real. Animals over time will adapt to their environment via optimized selection within the gene pool. For example a slow rat will take more time to get food and will become easier prey which makes him less likely to breed or provide for his family meanwhile a fast rat will get food faster and avoid danger making him capable of breeding more and more easily providing for his family. """scientists""" take this concept and make it retarded by saying that over the course of 6 gorllion years the fast rat will eventually become a new animal. Obviously one animal cannot change into another, i believe thats called thermodynamics. The idea that energy and matter cannot be destroyed, only change form.
>>11541 also the correlation between his name and ruddy could also be a reference to clay, seeing as that is what he was most likely made of.
>>11544 You see the slight problem with that is that the differences between the negro and the European are vastly different in comparison to a slow rat and a fast rat. We are actually pretty different in terms of physiological make up. Africans have faster twitch muscles for example. What you bring up as micro evolution is closer to the difference between a bantu and a zulu or the difference between a Dutch and a German. The difference between Africans, Europeans and Asians is closer to that of the difference between a lion, a Jaguar and a Tiger. Both part of the same group. But obviously different enough to be given their own classification.
>>11548 >The difference between Africans, Europeans and Asians is closer to that of the difference between a lion, a Jaguar and a Tiger. Both part of the same group. But obviously different enough to be given their own classification. yes and each living in their own drastically different environments. That was what i was trying to say
>>11550 Not entirely accurate. Leopards and lions live in similar environments and they both are panther cats.

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms
Delete
Report

no cookies?